• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[YouTube] Shirrako's account reinstated after killing feminist NPC in RDR2 [Restored: Read OP]

JordanN

Banned
When is youtube going to remove videos of Civilization? You can drop nukes on Gandhi for no reason whatsoever. :unsure:

Dp61BAY.jpg

 
Last edited:

Iaterain

Member
It quite similar to Logan Paul's situation, when he had uploaded a video of dead body.
Both are popular youtubers who are trying to make the edgiest video ever for clicks and views. Both have made really disgusting and immoral videos. One got away with it, the other got punished.

If you ask me, I feel sorry for this person it is a great loss for him. But when I saw his videos on reddit my first impression was disgust. It was't just a playing a game, he has put a certain violent and political "message" in his gameplay video in order to make it "spicier". That is why his channel was terminated.

I want youtube to be place of freedom and creativity, but for some certain people, who have no chill, sadly, there should be drawn "a line".
 

Enygger_Tzu

Banned
Exactly! You got it.

Funny, in my old Greek forum from the 11' we and at least 20 other people wanted to pull down the video of a "Grey Wolf" (Turkey's hard-right extremist group) where they burn a Greek flag and chant their rhetory about murdering Greeks, it took us 9 months (!) to pull this video down with at least two persons flagging it daily.

So, forgive me for not believing or trusting YT stuff to be impartial.
 

ILLtown

Member
Both have made really disgusting and immoral videos.
What's immoral about punching a feminist NPC in a video game?

What's immoral about calling a feminist NPC "annoying"?

I want youtube to be place of freedom and creativity, but for some certain people, who have no chill, sadly, there should be drawn "a line".
So you don't want it to be a place of freedom then. You lcontradicted yourself in only one sentence, lol.
 

JordanN

Banned
It quite similar to Logan Paul's situation, when he had uploaded a video of dead body.
Both are popular youtubers who are trying to make the edgiest video ever for clicks and views. Both have made really disgusting and immoral videos. One got away with it, the other got punished.
Except the dead body in Logan's video was real.

NPCs are not real.

If we're drawing the line on morality, then again, what's going to happen to video games where you can kill Gandhi?
 
Last edited:

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
youtube is fucking garbage. i remember watching a joe rogan clip where he said he had dinner with some of the youtube higher ups and they were talking about censoring videos. these people truly believe it their moral goal to do this kind of bullshit. its fucking gross

You are being Entitled right now. It's Google's own servers. They have the right to say what does and doesn't belong on their own website. Not you! You are allowed to not like Youtube though and go to DailyMotion if you'd like.
 
This same channel had multiple videos of him killing klansmen. He had tons of RDR2 videos of just killing people(men) in creative ways.

He wasn't pushing politics. Such bullshit

It doesn't matter what he's pushing, it what people perceive he is pushing. He was naive, especially in this current climate and he was taken down.

It's not nice having your every move judged, and blown out of all proportion and judged extra harshly is it?. Similar to the life of a black man.

You can simply lie to the police and get someone arrested, they may not get charged, but you can do that. It's happened to me twice, so I'm well aware of the bullshit.

You know the score, so keep your head on a swivel. Best way to beat this shit is to starve the fuckers.
 

Tripolygon

Banned
I take exception to someone quoting me and stating "that's exactly what I said" and then referring to something I specifically didn't say.
I feel like i've gotten my wires crossed somewhere as im replying to different people so let me refresh.

In regards to youtube actions

ILLtown: But his previous "killing cops" videos were fine, it seems.....

Me: Different things carry certain connotations and draws different reactions from different people.
(no outrage from people so it did not draw youtube and social media attention)

You: Except the argument is: why is the same behaviour perpetrated against one arbitrary collection of 0 and 1s treated differently than against another arbitrary collection of 0 and 1s
And the answer is: Double standards.

Me: That's exactly what i said. Its double standards
(people reacted differently to this situation so the outcome was different)

You: Check the words I put in bold in my original comment. You appear to have mistaken one for the other.
About as ill-considered as the implicit endorsement of double-standards.

Me: You took exception to the answer i gave which is similar answer you gave (double standards) but worded differently.
I'm not for double standards, i'm for treating certain subjects and situations different depending on context.

You: I take exception to someone quoting me and stating "that's exactly what I said" and then referring to something I specifically didn't say.

Me: Take exact in the same vein as literally meaning not literally. I said certain things gets different reaction from people, his previous videos did not but these recent videos did that is why he was banned. Like people having double standards for certain things

You: A corporation or a service or a video hosting site is not a being.
And, on contrary to an inconsistent being, it governs its content by a (supposedly) uniform code of conduct and terms of service.
If it doesn't do this uniformally then people cannot know what the rules are.
If the rules are not known, people cannot comply with them.

Me: I wasn't talking about corporations, i was talking about the situation that led to a corporation taking an action. People reacted to his video which led to Google the corporation banning him.

You: So, once we move the goalposts back into their original position, you'll find the specifics of the concerns are not addressed by your casual re-wording and misrepresentation of them.

Me: I haven't moved the goalpost, i still maintain that people didn't react to his other videos the same way they reacted to his feminist videos. Again like people having double standards to certain things and topics.

You: Not only are you espousing endorsement for double-standards, you're fooling yourself by treating "same" as "different" and giving sentience to lifeless entities in order to justify it.
This is the path of distortion and misrepresentation that simply leads to more distortion and misrepresentation as the double-standard hole you start to dig for yourself gets deeper and deeper and deeper.

Me: I am not espousing double standards. I am saying certain contexts will change my reactions to certain things. If his title was killing whites, blacks, women, children, it would get a different reaction out of me than killing nazis, men, people, npcs. If the channel however was owned by a girl and her title was killing men, it would have gotten a strong reaction out of me.

I do not and have never proclaimed my views were universal because they are not. My views change based on contexts. My reaction change based on contexts as well, if that means i have double standard then i suppose it is but my views on double standards is if every things remain equal but the subject is different then they ought to be treated equally. But then again that does not hold true in every situation for me.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Funny, in my old Greek forum from the 11' we and at least 20 other people wanted to pull down the video of a "Grey Wolf" (Turkey's hard-right extremist group) where they burn a Greek flag and chant their rhetory about murdering Greeks, it took us 9 months (!) to pull this video down with at least two persons flagging it daily.

So, forgive me for not believing or trusting YT stuff to be impartial.

I have to assume that being it was 7 years ago, that's why it took that long. YouTube has changed since then overall when it comes to banning videos of certain types.
 
S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
He's still leeching off drama since that's the thing bringing him money, but honestly he's been helping a lot of people with issues similar to this.
TFW Gay Retard's video didn't destroy keemstar smh.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Reversing a bad, unfair decision that exposed their double standards, why you are offended about it?

I'm not offended at all. Seems there were some people wanting to boycott YouTube over this. Now I'm wondering how they feel about YouTube now after the reversal.
 

Enygger_Tzu

Banned
I'm not offended at all. Seems there were some people wanting to boycott YouTube over this. Now I'm wondering how they feel about YouTube now after the reversal.

I thought your stance was that "YT can do whatever they want with their property to avoid image damage." Well it seems that the damage from catering to some insignificant minority is bigger than silencing a dissenting voice.
 

Tripolygon

Banned
You are supposed to feel differently because it's two different situations. But in the context of videogames the only thing that happens really is that two 3D models and a bunch of pixels are depicting death. Nobody gets hurt really.
Pixels that represent people. Even if said pixels do not represent people but animals, people still form emotional attachment to them. It is simply reductionist to say they are pixels, they're not just pixels. Those pixels mean something that is why we are able to get emotional reaction from words in books, paints on canvases, notes in a song and pixels on a screen
Same thing applies. I don't know what you arguing about here.
But it doesn't to different people, if it did, it would have gotten similar reaction.
Different, but similar situations, hence a double-standard.
It is the mere fact that something is different that elicits different response from people.

We don't need identity politics infecting more codes of conduct. Either inciting violence against innocent people is wrong or it's not. Don't say "it's OK against cops, but it's not OK against feminists!".
Inciting violence against people is wrong. That does not change that people will react differently depending on who.

It's kinda hilarious that all the white knights think that women need extra protection though. Women should be treated equally! Oh wait, we meant only in terms of the things we get to pick and choose!
I don't see anyone in this thread calling for that.
 
if i remember correctly, there is a mission in this game where you break out a criminal from jail and basically shoot and kill the entire town's police.
 
I am saying certain contexts will change my reactions to certain things.
No. The same act remains the same, regardless of a third party's interpretation of it.
And if such delicate context matters, it does so at remarkable expense to significant details such as, oh, I don't know.. ..say.. distinguishing reality from fantasy.
 

ILLtown

Member
So how do we all view Youtube now?
My opinion on YouTube is unchanged, because I've seen this happen before more than once.

Consistency and clarity is what's needed. Here's 2 things that I think are likely true: -

1. If it wasn't for the media and outrage mobs, this guy's content would never have been touched in the first place.

2. If it wasn't for big name YouTubers starting to go to bat for this guy, I don't think the outcome would have been the same.

It's not just YouTube either that has these problems. Several other large platforms do as well.
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Going out of your way to kill npcs for having political opinions you do not like and to make provocative videos of that to piss of a good share of humans is incomparable to the "normal" murders in games. The intention is clearly bad and I find it OK that Youtube bans for that.
Thanks pc yoshi
 

MayauMiao

Member
Great job to the SJW sites complaining about this. Now more youtubers are creating anti feminist videos attacking the SJW websites, which hopefully drive even more gamers away from reading trash like of Vice, Waypoint, Polygon.
 

EDMIX

Member
I wouldn't say pure shit, YT has basically replaced TV for me and it's where I view most of my gaming related content. Tons of great stuff there.

Agreed and when it comes to that type of support, of course they are going to stand by the sponsors. That type of platform for as big as it is, also means that type of content is clearly going to be......frowned upon lol
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Great job to the SJW sites complaining about this. Now more youtubers are creating anti feminist videos attacking the SJW websites, which hopefully drive even more gamers away from reading trash like of Vice, Waypoint, Polygon.

The funny part is all three of those are the same company. It's the very reason that regurgitate the same bullshit.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
I thought your stance was that "YT can do whatever they want with their property to avoid image damage." Well it seems that the damage from catering to some insignificant minority is bigger than silencing a dissenting voice.


You're missing the point. Think about it and my point that you just repeated. YT literally did just that. They did what they wanted. At first they took it down. Then backlash happened and they put it all back up with some age restrictions. I call that a smart company that understands how to maneuver in today's world. It's great.
 

Tripolygon

Banned
No. The same act remains the same, regardless of a third party's interpretation of it.
And if such delicate context matters, it does so at remarkable expense to significant details such as, oh, I don't know.. ..say.. distinguishing reality from fantasy.
Good for you but doesn't work like that in the real world. We apply different standards to different people in similar situations all the time.
 

BlackTron

Member
As a white male, let me say that one time, I saw a white male get killed in a gaming video, and I'm outraged that it hasn't been taken down yet!
 

Tripolygon

Banned
You're missing the point. Think about it and my point that you just repeated. YT literally did just that. They did what they wanted. At first they took it down. Then backlash happened and they put it all back up with some age restrictions. I call that a smart company that understands how to maneuver in today's world. It's great.
Free market is a beautiful thing. Sometimes. Still fuck you ATT and Comcast.
 

Scopa

The Tribe Has Spoken
Once again, these idiotic activists are not intelligent enough to realise what they are doing.

Actively encouraging censorship for the most inane things is so absolutely dumb and will backfire on them eventually.

They should hand in their brain card. That’s a wrap.
 
S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
You're missing the point. Think about it and my point that you just repeated. YT literally did just that. They did what they wanted. At first they took it down. Then backlash happened and they put it all back up with some age restrictions. I call that a smart company that understands how to maneuver in today's world. It's great.
tenor.gif
 

ILLtown

Member
You're missing the point. Think about it and my point that you just repeated. YT literally did just that. They did what they wanted. At first they took it down. Then backlash happened and they put it all back up with some age restrictions. I call that a smart company that understands how to maneuver in today's world. It's great.
I don't think it's smart at all, because it creates an air of uncertainty and erodes trust. That's the last thing you should want content creators to feel as a platform holder, cos they're your bread and butter. I wouldn't want to feel like my content can be taken down if a video of mine attracts the attention of some wanky video game websites and they start clutching at pearls over it, nor would I want to feel like my only chance of getting my content/channel back is to hope that I can tweet at Boogie or Keemstar and have them help me it. That's not great. It's fucking garbage.

I want clarity and consistency, not mob rule.
 

Barakov

Gold Member
I don't think he got banned for just one video:
XdQR74a.png
You know what, I can see those videos getting flagged but nuking the entire channel? Ridiculous. This is youtube showing their hypocrisy again. If they did this to a male character they wouldn't even blink. They might even promote it actually.
 

nkarafo

Member
Pixels that represent people. Even if said pixels do not represent people but animals, people still form emotional attachment to them. It is simply reductionist to say they are pixels, they're not just pixels. Those pixels mean something that is why we are able to get emotional reaction from words in books, paints on canvases, notes in a song and pixels on a screen
Videogames are entertainment. This particular game is also not for everyone. It's a very violent game. If you can't handle the depicted violence you are free to avoid it and play something else. You are also free to avoid videos about said game. Endorsing it's censorship just because you don't like it is just bullshit in my eyes.

Anyway, thanks for the debate too man.
 
Last edited:

Javthusiast

Banned
Pointed out what hypocrites people on ReeeEra are for giving zero shit about all the men and women getting killed in the game in tons of videos, but making a big fuss about this feminist npc video and game bloggers going on a triggered spree.

Promtly got banned till november 14th, lmao.

Once I have access again I am going out with a nice little post there to be released from that hivemind for good. xD
 
NPCs are real people guys, unless they are male NPCs, in which case you can do whatever you want with them!

People who say he deserved to get banned over this are no better than the people that say videogames make kids violent. Get a grip.

Pointed out what hypocrites people on ReeeEra are for giving zero shit about all the men and women getting killed in the game in tons of videos, but making a big fuss about this feminist npc video and game bloggers going on a triggered spree.

Promtly got banned till november 14th, lmao.

Once I have access again I am going out with a nice little post there to be released from that hivemind for good. xD


They don't like differing opinions, that's for sure! I was banned (reason they gave: transphobia) for saying how someone sees gender is subjective and different to every person.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom