It happens also yeah it exists and I actually have the entire log of one of those channels but only up till a point and it's not recent.
We need to see some reciepts.
They are severely psychologically damaged folk who suffer from untreated (or poorly treated) mental illnesses.
FWIW you got under the radar of GAF judging by
this thread.
Yikes, not a good look, is that the hill you want to die on, and
problematic.
You know what you can also make out of ResetERA?
Right, I wasn't going to go out of my way to hide who I was, because that just makes it more obvious that I'm "breaking the rules," and I didn't think it was a "seriously" enforced rule, again, because of examples like "Dennis8K" and "Ban Puncher," who are obvious alts and who even outright state and mock the fact that they're circumventing previous bans through alts.
I don't want to obfuscate who I am. I try to use the same username or as close as possible everywhere I go to keep my identity consistent and my integrity intact.
I actually dont know Ban Puncher by name, perhaps by avatar? I have seen that name around though but who is that alt?
Not abolished, just links to era get an unsafe warning
Well if there is actually such a thing as a Forum STD...
Source on that? Dennis8K has been on Resetera since October 2017, so I cannot believe he is a ban avoiding alt.
- Dennis is Dennis.
- Dennis loves PC's.
- Dennis loves 4K's.
Mix these 3 ingredients together and what might be the result? Perhaps a Dennis8K?
Here is one more to add credulence: There was a brief
grace period where
all emails were allowed. Perhaps Dennis used that?
Like my own Smoking Gun post before which you also casted doubt upon, i agree that this is a bit more circumstantial but still, this is just a case of adding things up on the scale of likelyhood. That and Blam already mentioned earlier in this thread how making alts is really easy since their scans don't run deep.
It isn't like people will make multiple accounts to post from on the new forum when they were probably doing it on the old forum...
It is also surprisingly easy to generate new alts, on their registration list there used to be an option (Or so i saw in this thread) that you could point out if you were using an alt or not.
I should just put that in bolded: ERA actually had an option so that new users and alts could mark if you were an alt or not.
I thought it was debunked as a joke but i did see a shot of that option being real, so... who would they be kidding with that?
I hate to break it to you guys, but you are a bit late on the Twitter news. The mod captains were made aware almost immediately and Cerium has already been in touch with Twitter support. It seems to have been a simple mistake with the Twitter report algorithm that came as a result of a coordinated report spam. They reported enough ResetEra links quickly enough to trigger a Twitter safeguard that automatically blocks a site after a set number of reports in a short amount of time. Its to protect users from potentially harmful sites that are shared by adbots.
Era will live on it seems. Much to your dismay lol
Just a friendly bit of advice: The bolded highlights
exactly why people call you out often. It is not because you have an alternative opinion: It is that in a rather disguised manner, you
lol at the emotions around here regarding ERA. Its disingenous, come on.
Now, do i agree that the Twitter thing is overblown? Sure, and the views expressed on GAF regarding those aren't mines. But i am not going to go around and be like
''Lol, much to your dismay eh GAF?'' when you already have an
image going on and you are affilated with the staff. All of which combined would make me advise against making such statements.
Mind you, i am not calling you out as heavily as others do, as i try to be constructive here.
I'm sorry what? They are the exact fucking opposite of Transphobic.
Then what do you call the people whose threads get featured here? I am not talking about the majority of folk that just post similar to GAF here, i am talking about those people/threads that get featured here. What are they to you?
Another exaggeration. People disagree on Era all the time on all kinds of topics and aren't banned.
This is only a half-truth. People
will disagree with you on many things, but there are a few
pet peeves that will
make or
break your stay on ERA. You know this because you have been in this thread for a while now.
To deny that would be rather naive, don't you think so?
What seems to me is that you turn a blind eye to the more ridiculous bans (Nor hardly if ever point out the
inconsistency that is among bans for similar offences, sometimes no action is even undertaken at all) but then make this stance
as if ERA is the
new normal. It isn't.
That is actually what's dangerous: Normalizing the kind of behavior
The Names undertake.
You can't just keep up pretending that your ship will never get hit by an iceberg as you are hit by an iceberg and you are on the ship Titanic. That is like, literally ignoring reality at that stage.
You guys just choose to focus on the ones that fit your narrative so you can try to paint the entire site and its userbase as something its not.
Again, please stop with the Ad Populums. Like how not the entire site is like that, so should you not paint the entirety of GAF as one and the same. Because that's rather hypocritical to do.
Blam
, @I'm new be nice,
Ailynn
