LolThis is why MS can't beat sony. They don't know how to produce good game development. 3 devs worked on this shit, and the whole cloud super physics azure server shit never worked they spent millions trying and failed.
Is there a black crush issue with this game....
A game 5 years in development, yet not much in the way of atmosphere.... and so many duplicate bulidings and assets.....Weak textures....Chromatic Aberration overlaod...This game lacks so much in detail and complexity....Buildings fall like cheap lego products.....What were these guys doing? I guess they just wanted to ensure this run at 4k on XBONEX, but the game I'm seeing here looks like it should run at 60fps on an XBONES......Edit: I just want to make it very clear that I don't even own a Playstation. I don't see any value in the $600~ PS4 pro barely pushing 1400p in AAA games and I bought the One X specifically for 4K native Red Dead 2. I don't have an anti-xbox agenda here. I'm just pointing out the facts that CD3 is technically and visually below average.
Where is the X pictures?People must be playing on the regular xbox on a TV out of the 80's because on the 1X on a 4k OLED with HDR, this game looks incredible, especially with the sheer action that goes on at once.
What chaps my cheeks about many of the CD3 reviews is we are being told that the game is "average" and "mediocre." Compared to what standard is CD3 average and mediocre? This needs to be clarified. Is it only average in the pool of the *thousands* of games that are made every year of wildly varying quality? Nonsense. CD3 is clearly far better than the average game in this sense. So are reviewers meaning that it is merely average among other major releases (big productions, big budgets, etc.) and the mere handful of other small games from tiny teams that found lighting in the bottle are were major successes? If yes, that is a critical distinction. "He's a mediocre basketball player" and "He's a mediocre basketball player in the NBA" are two statements with a small qualifier that make a world of difference.
I do not accept that Crackdown 3 is average or mediocre when compared to all other games. I am willing to accept that it is average among major big-budget releases. I feel bad for the team(s) involved because the game is getting reviewed worse than most games and the product is of far greater quality than that.
Crackdown 3, like its predecessors, sports comic book-style designs with vibrant, outlined 3D models. The art direction is decent, with interesting characters and a neon-washed sci-fi city that makes for great screencaps. The lighting and modelling work leaves a lot to be desired, however. Crackdown 3 is a relatively dated-looking game, even when taking into account that stylized art. Luckily for Crackdown 3, the action is so incredibly fast-paced you'll rarely have time to sit back and examine the sights.
Draw distance aside, the visuals are underwhelming, leaning too heavily on recreating the simple cel-shaded look of past Crackdown games. The one technological advancement the game has to boast about--large-scale destruction, powered by Microsoft's Azure cloud servers--is reserved entirely for the online Wrecking Zone mode, which uses mode-specific maps rather than letting you blow up parts of the city itself. There's no meaningful destruction in the campaign, and the end result is a world that feels lifeless, as if some key element of it is missing.
When people say it looks like a 360 game, they're saying the graphics have not evolved much since that era. It's not suppose to be taken literally, but it does feel like the game is stuck in the past when it comes to graphics.
Gravity Rush was inspired by Crackdown and that game too uses a similar cartoon art style. We can see how the graphics evolved from 2012 to 2017 (or the remaster version on the PS4).
Gravity Rush
Gravity Rush 2
The environment looks like a generational leap. And the animation? It looks great.
Personally, it's hard to be really impressed when I see games like this while Crackdown 3 stays behind in many areas graphically. People are entitled to their own opinion, but this is just mine.
Yap. To me Gravity Rush has one of the best art direction in games. When you flying(falling) around and you see one of city island that part of it covered with clouds, it just gives “castles in the sky” vibe and I absolutely love it!GR2 has never been on my radar but those animations are a visual orgasm.
Bloodborne and god of war(2018) shit on all the ms games gameplaywise. Try harder, and play something good like vanquish.Sony good at cinematics and story gameplay has always been lacking
Bloodborne and god of war(2018) shit on all the ms games gameplaywise. Try harder, and play something good like vanquish.
another youtube player, i see. It's funny when xbots don't say anything good on other games except for microsoft gamesTheir is nothing good about GoW's gameplay. It's bottom of the barrel. You can brake the combat just spamming the ax throw over and over again for 90% of the encounters.
bloodbourn is fromsoftwareBloodborne and god of war(2018) shit on all the ms games gameplaywise. Try harder, and play something good like vanquish.
another youtube player, i see. It's funny when xbots don't say anything good on other games except for microsoft games
Weird. I’ve tried that and got my ass handed to me.Their is nothing good about GoW's gameplay. It's bottom of the barrel. You can brake the combat just spamming the ax throw over and over again for 90% of the encounters.
IGN separately reviewed the Multiplayer on its own
https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/02/16/crackdown-3-multiplayer-review
4/10
Xbots????another youtube player, i see. It's funny when xbots don't say anything good on other games except for microsoft games
Made me chuckle, just like Nintendrones.Xbots????
Really????
Xbots????
...........Really???
No. the island is HUGE in this game though.The city seems.. small? I feel like I've sen 90% of it and played 4-6 hours. I've killed several bosses, not sure how much of the story is left. I was thinking there was going to be more than one island, is there?
No. the island is HUGE in this game though.
And...you're playing for the story? What story? Lol.
Huge, this map?
Not only did I buy it for full price (£59.99, because I had to buy it from Amazon digitally to get around geographical restrictions), I bought an Xbox One X the day before in order to play it, with minimal intention of getting any other games. And I love it as I knew I would, and I can't wait to get home from work tonight to play it more. I was late to a house party last night because I couldn't stop collecting orbs.I'd say the people defending it wouldn't pay the full price and would only get it through Game Pass. Easier to say it's not too bad when it's practically free.
But spending near to £50 on it, I bet most those people wouldn't be so forgiving then.
Bloodborne is actually Sony just like Crackdown 3 is MS.bloodbourn is fromsoftware
Good news: User reviews are up on Metacritic to 4.2/10
Bad news: Critic reviews just dropped down on Metacritic to 59%
Heavens to Betsy. Has Chill Spencer chimed in on this debacle yet?
Thats the one. Compare to Crackdown #1 and #2. I think the devs said its bigger than both combined.
I just checked his twitter. Wish i could do the laughing roll emoji.
“Playing a lot of Crackdown 3 and having a lot of fun.”
Yes and the first sign of this was all xbox exclusive would go to pc because they couldn't make a profit from the low user baseThe quality of recent Xbox games is why I think MSFT was forced to implement gamepass. No one wants to buy these games, that's why renting service was essential.
If you look at the user reviews it's fairly obvious that hundreds of trolls purposely gave the game a score of 0-10 out of 100. Those aren't honest reviews, just more fanboy driven trash. Seriously, there are currently 260 negative reviews and almost all of them are scores of less than 10. Metacritic needs to do some serious quality control.Good news: User reviews are up on Metacritic to 4.2/10
Bad news: Critic reviews just dropped down on Metacritic to 59%
If you look at the user reviews it's fairly obvious that hundreds of trolls purposely gave the game a score of 0-10 out of 100. Those aren't honest reviews, just more fanboy driven trash. Seriously, there are currently 260 negative reviews and almost all of them are scores of less than 10. Metacritic needs to do some serious quality control.
That won’t fit his agenda against the CD3 low score conspiracy.Now explain the 8.7 metacritic user score for Spiderman PS4. Or the 9.1 user score for God of War.
Go ahead. I will wait.
That won’t fit his agenda against the CD3 low score conspiracy.
You might be right.I think GTA3's map is larger... Like, not even being hyperbolic here.
People would've originally needed to think highly of Crackdown 3 for it to be considered a disappointment.
Everyone expected this to happen.
Not really, you should read a few threads before this one, even in this thread some folk have expressed disappointment.......And no matter what anyone says, most fans did not expect a score of 60, they expected a higher score than that.......I mean yes, some persons definitely saw this coming, but some people were banking on CD3 to change MS's critical slump a bit, yet it reviewed much worse than all the other MS exclusives that came before it....
Gameplay over story.
When people say it looks like a 360 game, they're saying the graphics have not evolved much since that era. It's not suppose to be taken literally, but it does feel like the game is stuck in the past when it comes to graphics.
Gravity Rush was inspired by Crackdown and that game too uses a similar cartoon art style. We can see how the graphics evolved from 2012 to 2017 (or the remaster version on the PS4).
Gravity Rush
Gravity Rush 2
The environment looks like a generational leap. And the animation? It looks great.
Personally, it's hard to be really impressed when I see games like this while Crackdown 3 stays behind in many areas graphically. People are entitled to their own opinion, but this is just mine.
Yes, Gravity Rush 2 on the PS4 looks better than Gravity Rush on the Vita, but I think you're being somewhat disingenuous comparing it to the Crackdown series. The animations and the graphics are generationally better in Crackdown 3 as well, when compared to Crackdown 2. Here is a video comparing the graphics in Crackdown 2 to Crackdown 3. The graphics and animation in Crackdown 3 look way better than Crackdown 2.
This mostly my own personal taste, but I feel Crackdown 3 art direction is really lacking and the world looks really basic compare to other games. Gravity Rush 2 also has cel shaded/comic book like visuals but it art direction look so much more interesting and cities feels much more alive compare to Crackdown 3.I'm not.
Graphics look better, but they do not feel like a generational leap.
The environment and animation detail just look very basic in design, and for the most part, they don't really stand out. This is my opinion, but it's clear that a lot of people feel the same way and it's not because they're just hating on an Xbox game.
Like, how can someone be impressed by the way the game has a very basic look to it?
In open world games, it's always good to go around and notice the small environment details and Crackdown doesn't have very much of that compared to other games.
Never played this game. Any good?This mostly my own personal taste, but I feel Crackdown 3 art direction is really lacking and the world looks really basic compare to other games. Gravity Rush 2 also has cel shaded/comic book like visuals but it art direction look so much more interesting and cities feels much more alive compare to Crackdown 3.
Crackdown might even had more advance graphics in technical side but this why most of the time art direction more important than expensive graphics.
Never played this game. Any good?
It's on PS4, so it's a walking simulator.