• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Switch Lite announced

Saruhashi

Banned
From the perspective of the normal Switch, they have reduced options. Can we agree to that?


It has to have a charge port anyway, it has the same chipset inside, the only reason they removed the ability to connect to a tv with an external dongle is to make the full sized Switch that much more appealing.

Now, if it so turns out the silicon on the inside can fully support HDMI out through the USB-C jack and it is disabled via software, would you not consider that a reduction in options for the sake of reduction in options? Good for Nintendo's business, crappy for consumers.

Looking forward to the firmware mod that enables video out over the USB charging port.

We could agree if the normal Switch was going away but it isn't.

This time yesterday a potential Nintendo Switch owner had one choice (we wont bother counting color options, bundles etc).
Today that same potential owner has 2 choices. There is no "reduced options".

Fair enough. If someone already owns a Switch and enjoys the docked mode or even just enjoys having the choice then I don't see the Lite version as a good investment for them. They already own a Switch though so...

Nintendo Switch with detachable joy cons, dock, playing on TV etc already exists.

They come out with an alternative option and people are wound up because it's not the same as the original? Surely you just buy the original then?
 

Pimpbaa

Member
Glad I didn't wait for this (no tv out). But I can see how it could appeal to portable only gamers and those who can't afford the standard Switch. This is definitely going to be massive in Japan (and possibly in the western market with it's lower price). A shit ton more Switch gamers means even more 3rd party developers are doing to want a piece of the Switch pie, well Japanese developers at least. Might see more downgraded ports from ps4/xb1 games from western developers but nothing made for the Switch which is frustrating and disappointing.
 

lingpanda

Member
Definitely not marketed to me but neither was the 2DS. Should sell well in Japan. I require a big screen for my Mario and Zelda fix.
 

RScrewed

Member
We could agree if the normal Switch was going away but it isn't.

This time yesterday a potential Nintendo Switch owner had one choice (we wont bother counting color options, bundles etc).
Today that same potential owner has 2 choices. There is no "reduced options".

Fair enough. If someone already owns a Switch and enjoys the docked mode or even just enjoys having the choice then I don't see the Lite version as a good investment for them. They already own a Switch though so...

Nintendo Switch with detachable joy cons, dock, playing on TV etc already exists.

They come out with an alternative option and people are wound up because it's not the same as the original? Surely you just buy the original then?


Listen up, genius - I already own a Switch.

Would you please quit the conversational acrobatics for one second and understand the crux of my complaint?

If all the features are in there already to have HDMI out, and Nintendo went out of their way to software disable HDMI to make their Switch vanilla have an artificially higher feature list to justify the additional $100, would it not bother you?

And if it does not bother you, that's great - but it bothers me and i hope I put it in clear enough terms to explain why it bothers me.
 

Trimesh

Banned
Absolutely no reason to remove HDMI out, bet it was removed because they can't ensure 3rd party USB3 to HDMI dongles or they wanted to make the more expensive Switch more attractive.

Getting rid of the TV out makes perfect sense to me - on the original Switch, it's not just a connection, it's a whole alternate operating mode for the main CPU. So if you lose the video out, then you can design the whole thing on the basis that it's always going to be running in the reduced power handheld mode and you can use a smaller power delivery system and less cooling.

I also suspect this model is using the new die shrunk Tegra that's mentioned in some of the recent nVidia code releases, and if so would be dissipating less power on that basis, too. It's even possible that the combination of mobile only mode and the revised SoC may enable it to be a fanless design.

Obviously, this is speculation - but suggesting there are no technical reasons they might want to lose the video out is just wrong.
 

prag16

Banned
I really need to make a wall of dumb for every poster in here who thinks this is a pointless/bad idea and post it when this thing shifts like five million units before 2020.
The two ideas aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Wouldn't be the first time an unnecessary product sold a lot (you could argue that in and of itself makes it 'necessary' but I wouldn't necessarily agree).
 

Petrae

Member
Nope. It’s really not that much smaller, so it’s still not going to fit in my pocket— so it’s still going to require carrying a bag or backpack when I want to play games on the go. That’s pointless for me, when I have a 3DS, DS Lite, GBA SP, and/or a phone that already play games and don’t require extra baggage to transport. Being restricted to the shittier Handheld Mode (gimped performance) isn’t a selling point, either.
 

RScrewed

Member
Getting rid of the TV out makes perfect sense to me - on the original Switch, it's not just a connection, it's a whole alternate operating mode for the main CPU. So if you lose the video out, then you can design the whole thing on the basis that it's always going to be running in the reduced power handheld mode and you can use a smaller power delivery system and less cooling.

I also suspect this model is using the new die shrunk Tegra that's mentioned in some of the recent nVidia code releases, and if so would be dissipating less power on that basis, too. It's even possible that the combination of mobile only mode and the revised SoC may enable it to be a fanless design.

Obviously, this is speculation - but suggesting there are no technical reasons they might want to lose the video out is just wrong.

I'm not sure why a die shrink would affect what is likely a key component of the architecture - TV Out. If it turns out the new Shield also has no HDMI out and so the feature is not simply soft-disabled by Nintendo, I'll recant.

But right now this whole thing smells like the Wii U's inability to launch Gamecube games.
 
Last edited:

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
The two ideas aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Wouldn't be the first time an unnecessary product sold a lot (you could argue that in and of itself makes it 'necessary' but I wouldn't necessarily agree).

A PRODUCT that sells a shit ton of copies is objectively not a pointless or bad idea for the people that sold it. The product has achieved its primary goal; sell. If you needed qualification in my statement I'm talking about Nintendo here, not Joe Consumer.
 

Pidull

Member
Understandable that you can't dock this, it is probably not designed to disppate heat the way the regular switch does. The more efficient processor keeps heat down and allows them to remove cooling elements and thus shrink the size/cost.

What I don't understand is why they didn't announce the DX version alongside this.
 
I'm going to buy the inevitable Zelda-themed version when it's announced. I like the idea of having a portable-only Switch, in addition to one that's primarily docked. I wonder if Animal Crossing is going to support cloud-saves? Hmm, how hard is transferring saves back and forth on games that don't support cloud saves?
 

CeroFrio996

Banned
It's the same as Labo and the Kirby and Yoshi games etc.

People seem to have a hard time understanding that not every single videogame release has to be marketed specifically for them.

Switch "lite" was never going to be of any interest to me. I don't want a smaller screen. I enjoy connecting to the TV whenever I feel like it. I sometimes use the Joy-cons for table top multiplayer. I already bought the thing 2 years ago so the price is no longer a big deal.

However, if I were a parent looking to get a Switch for my kids or someone interested in handheld only and looking to save a few bucks then this model is pretty much perfect.

Seriously most of the negativity is "I didn't get exactly what I want at the price point I want so Nintendo is the dumbest company ever".

Lets say Nintendo mostly developed this for their Japanese market, that is apparently not that bothered about the "home console mode", and were looking to give them color options (which seems to be a big deal in Japan) and a better price. It still makes sense to release that in other regions so that people have the choice.

In general I just feel like it's not for me and that's fine, I already own a Switch.

Some of the outrage is funny though. Similar to the 2DS.

I do think I'd be more interested in it if I could sync saves for stuff like smash, pokemon, and animal crossing. OG switch is a little bulky, so if I was bringing it to work or something to play on my break I think the lite would be nice.

That said could you do that with cloud saves?
 

prag16

Banned
A PRODUCT that sells a shit ton of copies is objectively not a pointless or bad idea for the people that sold it. The product has achieved its primary goal; sell. If you needed qualification in my statement I'm talking about Nintendo here, not Joe Consumer.
If it is successful, that also likely means it will have heavily cannibalized og Switch sales, which needs to be considered. And then subsequently what percentage of Switch lite buyers will eventually realize they would rather have had the og Switch. And even then some of the design decisions were questionable. If it supported TV out or pro controllers they could have increased accessory sales, but they didn't want any of that apparently.
 

CeroFrio996

Banned
If it is successful, that also likely means it will have heavily cannibalized og Switch sales, which needs to be considered. And then subsequently what percentage of Switch lite buyers will eventually realize they would rather have had the og Switch. And even then some of the design decisions were questionable. If it supported TV out or pro controllers they could have increased accessory sales, but they didn't want any of that apparently.

I didn't read anywhere that it doesn't support pro controllers, and you can link up joy cons so why would you assume it wont function with other controllers?
 

iconmaster

Banned
What I don't understand is why they didn't announce the DX version alongside this.

If we look at the actual evidence for a Switch DX or Switch Pro, it's really pretty thin.

Some analysts guessed it might happen, and they managed to guess the Lite model. But even Pachter got that one, it was such an obviously smart move for Nintendo to do. What got everyone going was when Wall Street Journal claimed it'd heard reports of three different Switch models from Nintendo's supply chain. So that's vanilla Switch, Lite and a third variant -- if they're correct. But that third model could be a Switch Nano, for all we know.

Takashi Mochizuki (of the WSJ) only specified that one model “will have enhanced features targeted at avid videogamers." Well, that could mean anything: a better screen, more battery life, more onboard storage.

I've been wrong before, certainly. I was sure Banjo would never make it into Smash. 😂 But I think the Switch Pro is more of a fanboy dream than reality.
 

Alebrije

Member
Well , this is the new king of portables....will sell like crazy w/ Pokemon.

I am still waiting for a more powerfull Switch but it seems Nintendo wont do it since current version is doing fine.

Do not like the colors....a black mate would be great.
 

zenspider

Member
Listen up, genius - I already own a Switch.

Would you please quit the conversational acrobatics for one second and understand the crux of my complaint?

If all the features are in there already to have HDMI out, and Nintendo went out of their way to software disable HDMI to make their Switch vanilla have an artificially higher feature list to justify the additional $100, would it not bother you?

And if it does not bother you, that's great - but it bothers me and i hope I put it in clear enough terms to explain why it bothers me.

I might be wrong, but wouldn't there be some hardware component to a video out? Even if it's just a chip, it'd not a software lock to 'gimp' the Lite.
 
V

Vader1

Unconfirmed Member
I’ll be sticking with the original. Never use portable mode anyway.
 

prag16

Banned
I didn't read anywhere that it doesn't support pro controllers, and you can link up joy cons so why would you assume it wont function with other controllers?
You're right it apparently does support Pro controllers. Though the usefulness of them would be more compelling if there was a TV out mode.
 

Fbh

Member
The two ideas aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Wouldn't be the first time an unnecessary product sold a lot (you could argue that in and of itself makes it 'necessary' but I wouldn't necessarily agree).

The main objective of most products is to sell well and generate revenue.
If a product manages to get great sales and make a lot of money it's not dumb or stupid and it means the manufacturer made something the market wanted and that through design, marketing or whatever other reason managed to appeal to consumers.


Some people around here are too fixated on the Switch "Pro" that would have a real but probably way more limited audience than this thing. Because lets be real, of the 10 million + people that will buy Pokemon Sword/Shield at the end of the year, how many truly give a crap at what resolution and framerate its running at?
 
Last edited:
Launch day purchase justified for once..

I feel like this will sell like hot cakes..in Japan. This won’t be as successful in the west.
 
Last edited:

cireza

Member
This was the most predictable announcement ever.

It looks like the console is still using active cooling lol, so my guess is that they aren't even using a smaller revision of the Tegra.

This thing is on the cheap side, pretty sure that they could have used the space around the screen in a much better way. It is actually quite ugly to have this huge border.

Can't be plugged on a TV because handheld mode on TV would look like total shit, obviously.

With a 5.5 screen, they could have made a smaller console, if they had tried. But this design looks like it was driven by "make the most money possible".
 
Last edited:

CJY

Banned
Garbage. Hate the font they used. Yellow is my favourite color in general but hate the shade they used. Hate the way the dpad looks crooked in its cavity. Hate all the colors actually. Hope it fails.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
Oh no they are cannibalizing themselves, instead of selling more Switches they will be selling other Switches. It’s madness. Those are potential Switch sales going to a Switch instead of purchases of a Switch. How will they survive? /s
 
Last edited:

DESTROYA

Member
Really don’t get why people are mad about a cheaper lite model, it’s cheaper because it losses some features but the biggest complaints I hear are no TV out. How the hell are you going to use this “docked” for TV out if the joycons aren’t detachable? Buy a Switch Pro controller that would just add to what your spending on it any way . Last time I checked Pro controllers go for like $60-$70 so if you want TV out just buy the OG model.

OG Switch = $300

Switch lite + pro controller = $ 260/$270

So you guys are bitching about a $30-$40 difference, that’s like what I spend a week on my morning coffee.

I will say the lite version is not for me and the colors in my opinion are ugly but I’m aboard hoping for a pro version with bigger screen and more power.
 

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
If it is successful, that also likely means it will have heavily cannibalized og Switch sales, which needs to be considered. And then subsequently what percentage of Switch lite buyers will eventually realize they would rather have had the og Switch. And even then some of the design decisions were questionable. If it supported TV out or pro controllers they could have increased accessory sales, but they didn't want any of that apparently.

You're out of your entire damn mind if you think selling this thing with TV out wouldn't kill the regular model dead in the water.
 

clem84

Gold Member
I don't understand the obsession with putting that stupid looking bezel. I think generally consumers have been very clear in the past few years that less bezel is better. Missed opportunity. I'm also not crazy about the colors. An all white model would've been great.
 

iconmaster

Banned
This won’t be as successful in the west.

Probably true. What does Nintendo really have for that market?

img.png
 

Codes 208

Member
I don't understand the obsession with putting that stupid looking bezel. I think generally consumers have been very clear in the past few years that less bezel is better. Missed opportunity. I'm also not crazy about the colors. An all white model would've been great.
I personally prefer jet black but thats what modding is for
 

prag16

Banned
You're out of your entire damn mind if you think selling this thing with TV out wouldn't kill the regular model dead in the water.
Nah if this hypothetically had TV-out it'd likely still be limited to "handheld mode" in terms of graphics. And you're still losing the detachable joy-cons, rumble, etc. It also doesn't include a dock (or simplified dock 'dongle'... a $70 dock would be a very tough sell).

Less importantly, the color options are ass.
 

Breakage

Member
Are a lot of Switch games built with HD rumble in mind (I don't own a Switch)? If so isn't that gonna put devs in a tight spot when it comes to game mechanics that depend on HD rumble being present?
 
D

Deleted member 752119

Unconfirmed Member
And you should probably stop holding your breath for a Switch Pro. Why would Nintendo want the Switch to get more expensive? Maybe there'll be a spec bump in the vein of New 3DS if it becomes essentially free for Nintendo to do so. Otherwise, it's just not their style.

I don’t think they’ll make it more expensive. They’ll make it $300 and drop the base to $250 (or maybe stop making it).

But yeah, basically a small New 3DS like bump that lets them keep price (and profit) margins up. That’s my best guess anyway.
 

Verdanth

Member
A version 90% dedicated for the upcoming pokemon if you ask me.

Looks like a bad move, but it will sells like cupcakes.
 

Danny Dudekisser

I paid good money for this Dynex!
That's the opposite. That's the complete opposite of what I want :(

Gimme a Switch with decent hardware next time, plz.
 
D

Deleted member 752119

Unconfirmed Member
Are a lot of Switch games built with HD rumble in mind (I don't own a Switch)? If so isn't that gonna put devs in a tight spot when it comes to game mechanics that depend on HD rumble being present?

No. Only some things like 1-2 Switch (mostly a tech demo) make any type of gameplay usage out of it. Otherwise it’s just rumble like any other controller. Maybe more derailed but aren’t really going to notice a difference.
 
Top Bottom