Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
With 6 different 3ds modelsI dunno man. I think a Pro version is on the way.
Stating there wont be a pro switch model is just fing stupid
With 6 different 3ds modelsI dunno man. I think a Pro version is on the way.
From the perspective of the normal Switch, they have reduced options. Can we agree to that?
It has to have a charge port anyway, it has the same chipset inside, the only reason they removed the ability to connect to a tv with an external dongle is to make the full sized Switch that much more appealing.
Now, if it so turns out the silicon on the inside can fully support HDMI out through the USB-C jack and it is disabled via software, would you not consider that a reduction in options for the sake of reduction in options? Good for Nintendo's business, crappy for consumers.
Looking forward to the firmware mod that enables video out over the USB charging port.
We could agree if the normal Switch was going away but it isn't.
This time yesterday a potential Nintendo Switch owner had one choice (we wont bother counting color options, bundles etc).
Today that same potential owner has 2 choices. There is no "reduced options".
Fair enough. If someone already owns a Switch and enjoys the docked mode or even just enjoys having the choice then I don't see the Lite version as a good investment for them. They already own a Switch though so...
Nintendo Switch with detachable joy cons, dock, playing on TV etc already exists.
They come out with an alternative option and people are wound up because it's not the same as the original? Surely you just buy the original then?
Absolutely no reason to remove HDMI out, bet it was removed because they can't ensure 3rd party USB3 to HDMI dongles or they wanted to make the more expensive Switch more attractive.
The two ideas aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Wouldn't be the first time an unnecessary product sold a lot (you could argue that in and of itself makes it 'necessary' but I wouldn't necessarily agree).I really need to make a wall of dumb for every poster in here who thinks this is a pointless/bad idea and post it when this thing shifts like five million units before 2020.
Getting rid of the TV out makes perfect sense to me - on the original Switch, it's not just a connection, it's a whole alternate operating mode for the main CPU. So if you lose the video out, then you can design the whole thing on the basis that it's always going to be running in the reduced power handheld mode and you can use a smaller power delivery system and less cooling.
I also suspect this model is using the new die shrunk Tegra that's mentioned in some of the recent nVidia code releases, and if so would be dissipating less power on that basis, too. It's even possible that the combination of mobile only mode and the revised SoC may enable it to be a fanless design.
Obviously, this is speculation - but suggesting there are no technical reasons they might want to lose the video out is just wrong.
Madness this can't be docked. It's exactly the system I wanted to buy my Daughter, but not being able to dock it... Frustrating.
The two ideas aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Wouldn't be the first time an unnecessary product sold a lot (you could argue that in and of itself makes it 'necessary' but I wouldn't necessarily agree).
It's the same as Labo and the Kirby and Yoshi games etc.
People seem to have a hard time understanding that not every single videogame release has to be marketed specifically for them.
Switch "lite" was never going to be of any interest to me. I don't want a smaller screen. I enjoy connecting to the TV whenever I feel like it. I sometimes use the Joy-cons for table top multiplayer. I already bought the thing 2 years ago so the price is no longer a big deal.
However, if I were a parent looking to get a Switch for my kids or someone interested in handheld only and looking to save a few bucks then this model is pretty much perfect.
Seriously most of the negativity is "I didn't get exactly what I want at the price point I want so Nintendo is the dumbest company ever".
Lets say Nintendo mostly developed this for their Japanese market, that is apparently not that bothered about the "home console mode", and were looking to give them color options (which seems to be a big deal in Japan) and a better price. It still makes sense to release that in other regions so that people have the choice.
In general I just feel like it's not for me and that's fine, I already own a Switch.
Some of the outrage is funny though. Similar to the 2DS.
If it is successful, that also likely means it will have heavily cannibalized og Switch sales, which needs to be considered. And then subsequently what percentage of Switch lite buyers will eventually realize they would rather have had the og Switch. And even then some of the design decisions were questionable. If it supported TV out or pro controllers they could have increased accessory sales, but they didn't want any of that apparently.A PRODUCT that sells a shit ton of copies is objectively not a pointless or bad idea for the people that sold it. The product has achieved its primary goal; sell. If you needed qualification in my statement I'm talking about Nintendo here, not Joe Consumer.
Definitely nothing to announce at E3. A month later however...
If it is successful, that also likely means it will have heavily cannibalized og Switch sales, which needs to be considered. And then subsequently what percentage of Switch lite buyers will eventually realize they would rather have had the og Switch. And even then some of the design decisions were questionable. If it supported TV out or pro controllers they could have increased accessory sales, but they didn't want any of that apparently.
On resetera they say early 2020 for switch pro and that it is already in production
What I don't understand is why they didn't announce the DX version alongside this.
Listen up, genius - I already own a Switch.
Would you please quit the conversational acrobatics for one second and understand the crux of my complaint?
If all the features are in there already to have HDMI out, and Nintendo went out of their way to software disable HDMI to make their Switch vanilla have an artificially higher feature list to justify the additional $100, would it not bother you?
And if it does not bother you, that's great - but it bothers me and i hope I put it in clear enough terms to explain why it bothers me.
You're right it apparently does support Pro controllers. Though the usefulness of them would be more compelling if there was a TV out mode.I didn't read anywhere that it doesn't support pro controllers, and you can link up joy cons so why would you assume it wont function with other controllers?
The two ideas aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Wouldn't be the first time an unnecessary product sold a lot (you could argue that in and of itself makes it 'necessary' but I wouldn't necessarily agree).
Seriously. Launch price still in effect almost 2.5 years later with no price drop until AT LEAST next year since any drop this year would cannibalize the Lite model.Launch day purchase justified for once..
If it is successful, that also likely means it will have heavily cannibalized og Switch sales, which needs to be considered. And then subsequently what percentage of Switch lite buyers will eventually realize they would rather have had the og Switch. And even then some of the design decisions were questionable. If it supported TV out or pro controllers they could have increased accessory sales, but they didn't want any of that apparently.
Oh without a doubt, releasing it alongside zelda and eventually pokemon,Even with not connecting to a TV, this is gonna sell like crazy.
This won’t be as successful in the west.
I personally prefer jet black but thats what modding is forI don't understand the obsession with putting that stupid looking bezel. I think generally consumers have been very clear in the past few years that less bezel is better. Missed opportunity. I'm also not crazy about the colors. An all white model would've been great.
Nah if this hypothetically had TV-out it'd likely still be limited to "handheld mode" in terms of graphics. And you're still losing the detachable joy-cons, rumble, etc. It also doesn't include a dock (or simplified dock 'dongle'... a $70 dock would be a very tough sell).You're out of your entire damn mind if you think selling this thing with TV out wouldn't kill the regular model dead in the water.
Question -
Will I be able to finally play the digital games I already own on a second console?
Off topic. But the fact that Star Wars is ranked #9 is an embarrassment and a testament to Disney's severe mismanagement of the brand.Probably true. What does Nintendo really have for that market?
And you should probably stop holding your breath for a Switch Pro. Why would Nintendo want the Switch to get more expensive? Maybe there'll be a spec bump in the vein of New 3DS if it becomes essentially free for Nintendo to do so. Otherwise, it's just not their style.
Are a lot of Switch games built with HD rumble in mind (I don't own a Switch)? If so isn't that gonna put devs in a tight spot when it comes to game mechanics that depend on HD rumble being present?