yeah, it does. i do prefer steam but the reason i haven't bought it yet is because i have money in my Steam wallet that i'd rather use to buy it than spend money out my card.
9900K, 32GB, RTX 2080
yeah, it does. i do prefer steam but the reason i haven't bought it yet is because i have money in my Steam wallet that i'd rather use to buy it than spend money out my card.
i just wish rockstar weren't being dicks and would at least let me pre order it and maybe even give us a release date other than "December"
9900K, 32GB, RTX 2080
have you played it on console? i have it on PS4. i'm just wondering if it really feels better with a keyboard/mouse. the controls felt quite awkard
The 1070 can do 1080p60 without much issue, just not anywhere near ultra. It'll still look better than console though.
Nothing official I can find yet, still waiting on Alex from Digital Foundry to drop the nitty gritty video on the settings. But, I can say from playing that it feels much better to play. Haven't tried with a controller, but with the m/kb it really feels like shooting is a fun and compelling reason to play. Where as of the probably 60+ hours of my playthrough on the One X, I absolutely hated shooting and played so much because the attention to detail and the world was so compelling. Now, I get to have all of it.
It runs fine on potato processors...at 30FPS. It runs fine on high-end processors...just not necessarily while bottlenecking at ~120FPS at 1080p low with a 2080ti. Yeah, sure, totally sounds like a realistic use case.
Lower than low further intensifies.
Well clearly that's not true of RDR2, seeing as how it's able to peg a 4C4T CPU at 100%...something GTA5 is also able to do by the way. The only difference being that RDR2 will peg them at significantly lower framerates...almost as if it's more CPU demanding or something. Almost as if RDR2 was developed with the current generation of consoles in mind and GTA5 wasn't
Well you could try watching the video in the fucking OP. If you had you'd know DF said it...and DF isn't in the habit of making such claims if they're not true. Later today we're getting a video in which they will detail exactly which settings are lower than low.
I didn't do anything, Gamers Nexus did, so if you have an issue with their testing methodology then you should take it up with them, not me.
Like I said, the evidence comes later.
| Xbox One X Console Equivalent Settings | |
|---|---|
| Ultra | Texture Quality, Geometry Level of Detail (5/5) |
| High | Shadow Quality, Mirror Quality, Soft Shadows, Water Refraction Quality |
| High/Medium | Tessellation, TAA, Volumetric Lighting Quality, Parallax Occlusion Mapping |
| Medium | Lighting Quality, Screen-Space Ambient Occlusion, Particle Quality, Particle Lighting Quality, Fur Quality, Decal Quality, Water Reflection Quality |
| Low/Medium | Global Illumination Quality, Grass Shadows |
| Low/Lower Than Low | Far Shadow Quality, Reflection Quality, Near Volumetric Resolution, Far Volumetric Resolution, Water Physics Quality (1/6), Tree Quality, Grass Level of Detail (2/10) |
| Disabled Features | FXAA, MSAA, Unlocked Volumetric Ray March Resolution, Full Resolution SSAO, Long Shadows, TAA Sharpening |
www.eurogamer.net
Xbox One X Console Equivalent Settings Ultra Texture Quality, Geometry Level of Detail (5/5) High Shadow Quality, Mirror Quality, Soft Shadows, Water Refraction Quality High/Medium Tessellation, TAA, Volumetric Lighting Quality, Parallax Occlusion Mapping Medium Lighting Quality, Screen-Space Ambient Occlusion, Particle Quality, Particle Lighting Quality, Fur Quality, Decal Quality, Water Reflection Quality Low/Medium Global Illumination Quality, Grass Shadows Low/Lower Than Low Far Shadow Quality, Reflection Quality, Near Volumetric Resolution, Far Volumetric Resolution, Water Physics Quality (1/6), Tree Quality, Grass Level of Detail (2/10) Disabled Features FXAA, MSAA, Unlocked Volumetric Ray March Resolution, Full Resolution SSAO, Long Shadows, TAA Sharpening
Note: Some of Xbox One X's effects appear to be hybrid versions of low and medium, or medium and high. We'd recommend starting with the higher quality version, but should emphasise that the lower quality rendition of the effect still looks quite comparable across the run of play.
What does it take to run Red Dead Redemption 2 PC at 60fps?
Red Dead Redemption 2 on PC has some issues - fixable issues - but they shouldn't distract too much from the scale of t…
Seems to be news to you.
lukilladog said:
lukilladog said:
The more and more push back you got the more your response changed. It went from "It's very close to ultra" to "It's visually close to ultra" to "ackchyually that's not even news guise, we all knew it wasn't close to ultra all along".
Because I don't own the game yet. If I did I would've disproved your bullshit myself days ago. Hell, just a couple of days ago you were ranting about how low looks looks like shit and the visual fidelity is destroyed and you couldn't possibly set anything to low and not lose much visually
Alex don't have an acc here and he is very unlikely he will. Just John from most of the tech sites.
Because I don't own the game yet. If I did I would've disproved your bullshit myself days ago. Hell, just a couple of days ago you were ranting about how low looks looks like shit and the visual fidelity is destroyed and you couldn't possibly set anything to low and not lose much visually
It will be amazing.Besides, it's only a resahde, imagine once the real mods will show up, what will it be
support.rockstargames.com
Not true, check out the cpu benchmark video by gamers nexus (they are the best in the business) 4 core 8 thread cpus do extremely well in this game. Even really old ones like the 2600k.
GN already did further testing and the only 8T CPU to exhibit stuttering is the 9700K, and it's because it's hitting some kind of engine limit (and the 9700K is the only 8T CPU fast enough to reach this...infact it's the only CPU to exhibit this specific bug at all, the only way to get it to manifest on other parts is to overclock them far beyond what is achievable without exotic cooling). It's easily fixed by not allowing the framerate to reach ~120FPS, which considering how GPU heavy this game is, isn't hard. This is the same issue that causes GTA5 to stutter on 4T CPUs when hitting ~185FPS. In other words it's a long standing engine bug.
4 core 8 thread processors seem to universally play nice with this game. 2600k is holding up very strong. That's an 8 year old processor.
It's funny how the console versions all look blurry
