-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Coreteks: Detailed video about why he think PS5 will be the better console because of the I/O & SSD
Who is this guy? A random YouTuber?
I love his blog:
coreteks.tech
seriously though, do we really need a thread for every YouTube video and tweet? Why not a single OT with all the YouTube/twitter posts about SSD and call it a day?
I love his blog:
How to get 100K subscribers on YouTube – Coreteks
seriously though, do we really need a thread for every YouTube video and tweet? Why not a single OT with all the YouTube/twitter posts about SSD and call it a day?
Last edited:
Rightisright
Banned
Incoming threads from Sony Fanboys on why PS5s SSD will make it perform better than XSX in 3...2... oops, too late.
eastwood333
Banned
Nobodys bashing PS5. They're just stating XSX is more powerful. Stating facts and bashing are two separate things.
XSX is 12TF sustained at all times for devs to play with. PS5 is more like 9.2tf with the potential to temporarily boost to 10.2tf for the Michael Bay moments. However, the console will not be able to stay in boost reaching up 10.2 at all times without major heating issues,hence the need for variable clocks. Its really straight forward
Last edited:
sublimit
Banned
oldergamer
Member
Random guy #23 with hard drive io again? The extra io speed wont be that noticible to most customers. Also it wont run at full speed if they have heat issues like rumored
ANIMAL1975
Member
Who is this guy? A random YouTuber?
I love his blog:
How to get 100K subscribers on YouTube – Coreteks
seriously though, do we really need a thread for every YouTube video and tweet? Why not a single OT with all the YouTube/twitter posts about SSD and call it a day?
Like a clock.
sircaw
Banned
Little bit confused by this, so when the xbox does not need all the power the chip still remains at the same speed, locked. Why would they not take advantage of a system that would let them use less power if they don't need it. I am not really a technical guy but It seems like an oversight in design or just plain laziness?
Windows-PC
Banned
Sooner or later alot of people will find out the hard way that even the fastest SSD in the universe does nothing more or less than loading Data! 
eastwood333
Banned
People can't post facts anymore without it being considered " bashing a console' it seems.
OliverKahn
Banned
I think it's time for everyone on the internet to live with the fact about XSX has a better specs than PS5.
eastwood333
Banned
It's not complicated. Devs are allowed to push the XSX to the max of 12tf at all times, not just the temporary Michael Moments because it has far more CU's at far lower clocks to prevent heating issues. 10.2tf is the ceiling for the PS5,however given the high clock speeds, the boost mode is only for the Michael Bay type moments. Devs can not push the PS5 in boost mode at sustained clocks or it would have significant heathing issues. Hence, why there is variable clocks. I suspect PS5 will run in the 9.2tf neighborhood most of the time.
XSX's higher CU counts at lower clocks allows for sustained performance, where as a much lower CU count at significantly higher clocks creates heating issues, hence the need for variable clocks/boost mode. PS5 can only run in the high boost mode reaching the max of 10.2tf only temporarily during the most stressing points in games
Last edited:
Coulomb_Barrier
Member
Stop spreading FUD.
GPU clock is CAPPED at 2230Mhz not boosting to 2230Mhz, there's a difference. Therefore its 10.3tflops.
Aceofspades
Banned
Sooner or later alot of people will find out the hard way that even the fastest SSD in the universe does nothing more or less than loading Data!
Name checks out
Jon Neu
Banned
Well, there it is.
Jon Neu
Banned
Variable frequency precisely means that is NOT capped, therefore it isn't always 10 teraflops.
eastwood333
Banned
No, you're spreading FUD. Cerny didn't confirm that. The GPU and CPU being locked at a sustained clock of 2230Mhz will creat significant heating issues. That's why they went with variable clocks and not sustained.
Its not difficult to grasp.
Its why many believe MS chose the right direction. Significantly more CU's at much lower clocks allows for greater performance with less heating issues.
Last edited:
martino
Member
perfect gif . bravo
Coloress_Kafka
Member
Woah I had no idea AMD’s CEO not only worked at IBM but worked on CELL. 
Aceofspades
Banned
He is a PC guy.
Don't you guys find it strange that PS5 is exciting for Developers who create games and always praised by unbiased people? eg PC only YTers and other gaming channels.
There might be a reason for that which is the mighty impressive SSD and the I/O block that keeps bottlenecks to the minimum.
Shangounchained
Banned
Hes smocking weed and he also sounds high the series x is simply powerful, its got people high just to contemplate it
Kokoloko85
Member
ps5 at 9.2tfpnisnt true
Shangounchained
Banned
Pc guys hate the ps5 completely hate it because they cant beat it, they love the series x because its generic and easy to beat with a pc
TLZ
Banned
Kokoloko85
Member
Incoming xbox Fans brag aboit 12tfls but than say there happy with games like ori.....
Orta
Banned
You could build a PC this very moment that would wipe the floor with a PS5.
Coulomb_Barrier
Member
It's 10.3tflops, so it might go down to 10.2 in very rare circumstances, as he mentioned a 'couple percent drop' in frequency. Or 10.1.
eastwood333
Banned
eastwood333
Banned
Cerny did not confirm that. You're simply delusional if you think the PS5 is going to run at 2230Mhz 90% of the time. Thats laughable.
ethomaz
Banned
Nope.
And bullshit post doesn’t change that.
Cerny indeed said what he said.
Coupe of percent drop in clock to 10% decrease in power draw.
Cerny said too that in most of time it runs at max clock and the small drop in clocks happens in some workloads.
So it is hard to understand how anybody things PS5 will run anywhere close to 9.2TFs unless the guy saying that have a strong bias.
Last edited:
Shangounchained
Banned
It would cost you 3000$ so basically youd fuck urself up with a fire hydrant and end up with a torn up butthole for just trying to prove a point.
eastwood333
Banned
Why is it BS? So the PS5 GPU/CPU is going to run at 2230Mhz 90% of the time?
Last edited:
Shin
Banned
Mods are nowhere to be found, issues go ignored, even reporting yourself for a title change goes unanswered.
ethomaz
Banned
By Cerny works probably even more time.
Cerny was clear about just in some workloads the clock will drop and the drop is a coup of percent only.
So unless you have a strong bias 9.2TFs is far from the truth... it will probablystay close to 10TFs even when dropping the clock.
Last edited:
SleepDoctor
Banned
eastwood333
Banned
Cerny apparently defies logic. Reminds me of the MS guys in 2013 talking about move engines and esram being the savior.
Some people can rely on their own common sense, rather than blindly believe PR speak with questionable/skeptical wording
Last edited:
Orta
Banned
Oh dear.
megreotsugua
Banned
No wonder developers are so excited with PS5. I don't hear the same excitement for the XSEX.
ethomaz
Banned
What logic?
Do you looks to know more than Cerny about PS5.
Or maybe it is just bias lol
Last edited:
PocoJoe
Banned
Funny that xbots still seem to think that when we talk about PS5 + it's fast SSD and how it affects things they see it as "lol ps5 people think ps5 will have more tflops and performance than xsex LOLOLOL"
Xbot logic is the dumbest of all fanboys
"12 > 10 = IT IS BIG DIFFERENCE LOL LOL" and "5.5gb/s vs 2.4gb/s = lol why would sony perform any better ??? LOLO LOL" cant be true on the same time
Does 2x the bandwith make ps5 perform (it doesnt mean magical tflops etc, just data transfer) better? if you think the answer is no, then look in to mirror and say bloody mary 3x, maybe she comes to fix your brain.
Are you serious, you are one of those people that repeat that on every other thread if I remember correctly.
Like what is the point of "they are just stating xsex is more powerful"? The endgame? Saying obvious facts that others have already knew since the reveal and nobody is claiming xbox having weaker gpu/cpu
I havent seen a single comment saying that PS5 would have more tflops or faster CPU. So why it is needed to repeat day after day "lol xsex powerful"?
And then you and others spread that bullshit of "lol it is only 9.2 and temporary boost to 10.2" and "heating issues!!" like you would be Sony engineer. Cerny told us that it usually stays at 10.2 so that is the fact until proven otherwise.
You are just making yourself a clown.
If you have hard facts from Sony or 3rd party with physical PS5 unit and test data which shows that it stays at 9.2 tflops because of heat issues, then it is different thing. But now you are just fanatic xbox fanboy with zero knowledge and your agenda is to make xbox be some kind of winner.
"no body is bashing" and then you bash/downplay it and spread bullshit in next lines and talking about stating the facts and then you pull these numbers from your ass
----
I guess that it is difficult for people with lower than average IQ to understand that when people are talking about PS5 and it's specs, it doesnt somehow mean that now xsex is said to be slower and because of that it must be reminded in every corner.
Normal people saw that PS5s theoretical gpu/cpu power is less than xsex when we saw the reveal, but xbots still have to repeat that a week later.
Maybe they dont remember is it "12 > 10" or "12 < 10" and have to repeat it?
Last edited:
eastwood333
Banned
No, just don't blindly believer every PR speech that includes some skeptical/half truths from either side.
eastwood333
Banned
And 90% of the them are sony devs, NO? Maybe the XSX doesn't need any defending as it is the more powerful console.
Bernkastel
Ask me about my fanboy energy!
The so called devs excited for PS5 are either PS5 first party devs or ex-first party devs. The rest are just "both are good" and being quoted as devs excited for PS5. XSX on the other hand had a ex-Guerilla Games and ex-Space X/Valve guy praising them for being better. If you are to quote this youtuber then I will also say Austin Evans said XSX is significantly better.
Similar threads
- Locked