ItsVaporChamberCoolingLOL
PlayStation 5 may use vapor chamber cooling, new Sony patent suggests
A new Sony patent hints the PlayStation 5's heat sink will be similar to the Xbox One X, hinting at possible vapor-chamber cooling.www.tweaktown.com
I remember my PS3 being a bit louder than the PS4, yes. My launch PS3 did last 8 years, how many people can say the same about their launch 360, though?
The same level of hubris? Not even close. You don't see Sony execs suggesting you should get a second job. Even when Cerny talked about the PS5 cooling, he admitted to the lackluster effort done on the PS4 Pro. That's as far from hubris as it can get, if you ask me.
Just when I thought being a console gamer couldn't get any more embarrassing
To be fair, a few dollars spent on the cooling solution would be considered lavish compared to previous generationsJust when I thought being a console gamer couldn't get any more embarrassing
He was talking about dissipating heat with no respect to noise. He was right in that sense. PS3’s fan works well at what it’s supposed to do.
What superiority?? Wha???
LMAO!
The PS5 could spend more time at its peak 10.2 Tflops compared to the XSX at 12 because of the XSX's split ram pool/asymmetric set up going by that Crytek developers words
I bet both consoles perform closer than you expect when it comes to cross platform games. I seriously doubt one will have a huge advantage over the other, get ready for a let down.
It "could" do alot of things. But there's a stark difference in "could" and "will do". You post still doesn't change anything. There's a baseline that doesn't need a "could " to describe performance. That baseline is guaranteed and has to be in order for devs to fully understand what the PS5 brings to the table WITH CERTAINTY. Its not variable. 9.2 is that guaranteed delta. That's your baseline. 10.2 is what's possible at its peak. That's all I'm saying here..
I'll take that bet. I can guarantee you'll see noticeable differences in assets, textures, frames and resolutions with Series X. Not to say the PS5 won't be a beast in its own rights. But overall, the Series X will deliver much better in head to head comparisons. You in or out?
I was taking performance as in FPS. What do you mean exactly by noticeable difference? It’s not going to perform 40% better like i seen some posters say
Only except that you're speculating that 9.2 is the baseline when Mark Cerny said that performance doesn't see a considerable drop.
Links please.
The PS5 can spend more time rendering at its peak 10.2 because it has a faster GPU and the XSX will need to properly distribute resources amongst its 52 CUs or the number of CUs in use, drops
The Crytek developer said it. I won't post it here because it will be deleted
LOL expect an even harder time making those differences out. You'll get 2-3 more frames sometimes and no perceivable difference in resolution
What are you on about? I was poking fun at how poverish console gaming is.
Put your Avi where your mouth is broski.
I don't see how we could make a bet off of this. It will be based off of opinions. I'd win but still
The 12TF is held and locked. We have the chief architect of the Series X confirming this ad nauseum. Whoever told you that, lied. He even said, "12TF" is raw power. That's not variable". He made a point to say it. There's no "theoretical" about it.
Then shut the hell up and let's do the damn thing! lol.I don't see how we could make a bet off of this. It will be based off of opinions. I'd win but still
Tflops are always theoretical my friend
So they'll find 1 extra rendered leaf and you'd say "Boom, I told ya so"
What is locked is the frequency, not the teraflops number, which is a theoretical maximum expressing how many operations the GPU will calculate under maximum load (assuming no bottlenecks).
Any slight advantage in favor of XboxSX will be greatly emphasized, expect that.So they'll find 1 extra rendered leaf and you'd say "Boom, I told ya so"
Um, not really. It'll come down to more than just am extra leaf. Pretty sure you understand that much.So they'll find 1 extra rendered leaf and you'd say "Boom, I told ya so"
My point still remains however. The theoretical power delta is still at a much higher frequency with Series X than with the 10tf (variable) GPU found in the PS5. After a bit more research, you and Hobby are correct in stating the stated power deltas in teraflops (or floating points) are both theoretical in nature. But, even in frequencies the delta still sits much higher when comparing GPU's of both machines.
Of course, if the theoretical maximum is higher, so is the expected performance.
Okay, let me rephrase it, Sony should've just stuck with the 9.2 teraflops instead of "boosting the clocks"
They have to spend more money on the cooling system, which results in a more expensive console.
So answer me this. I want to be clear here: if 10.2 TF is (variable) on the PS5 but its guaranteed baseline is 9.2tf (yes, I do believe the 9.2 leak was real) what would you say is the Series X baseline of power? The guaranteed delta devs know with certainty they can count on. Or is 12tf the baseline delta?
