• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony teases instantaneous open world gaming with PlayStation 5's SSD

Tripolygon

Banned
Loading and processing are two different things, CPU and GPU is what processes the data (hence their names, duh), while storage drive and memory is what loads the data, so it's an obvious misspelling on his side, but I don't see a reason why people can't make jokes about it, actually misspells like that are the best opportunity to have some fun.
Showing a lack of understanding what CPU and GPU do. CPUs and GPUs load and process data. Storage stores data. When a CPU needs data, it loads the data from the storage into memory before processing it.

His statement was quite very clear. There is no room to misinterpret it or claim it was a misspelling or misunderstanding. The only misunderstanding here is you and your having "fun".
"In order to further enhance the sense of immersion in games, we expect to improve not just the resolution, but the speed of games. For example, through a custom‐designed high‐speed SSD, we plan to realize game data processing speeds that are approximately 100 times faster than PS4."

"Game load times should be much shorter, and players should be able to move through immense game worlds in almost an instant."
It is very very clear they are talking about data processing, not graphics processing but the speed at which data can be moved from storage and processed. It is 100X faster on PS5 when compared to PS4.
ExkrceI.jpg
 
Last edited:

vivftp

Member
They need to dial this shit back until they can show some games that look and run 100x better
I don't care what they said, that's what I'm saying. All this talk is gonna be embarrassing when they show 1440p 30fps piles of shit

Yzmi1H.gif


Sony, nor anyone else ever said anything about games looking and running 100x better. Stumbling into a thread about one thing (~100x data processing speeds) and complaining about some made-up stat you created isn't a good look.

There will be plenty of 30 FPS and 60 FPS games next gen. There will also be plenty of games that aim for native 4K and ones that will use reconstruction techniques to hit 4K, and the resolution difference will be imperceptible to all but the pixel peepers in most cases.
 

Thabass

Member
I like your optimism, I've been playing some of my favourite games of all time over the past ten (10) years but apparently many people echo the sentiment that there is "nothing to play"...



It's weird because some of the best games have come out in these era alone:

BOTW
Horizon Zero Dawn
The Witcher 3
FFVII Remake (surprising, I know)
Assassins Creed Odyssey
MGSV (the story sucked but, the gameplay was the best in the series)
Hotline Miami
Celeste

These are just to name a very small chunk off the top of my head. I'm sure a lot of you have more you could add.
 
Sony has a narrative for their power increase, XBox doesn't.

Hmmm, maybe. I think one could argue that MS does have a narrative. Their GPU power/advantage has to count for something, right? I just think Sony has been a lot more clever with their narrative/marketing their advantage so far. They've been patient, they haven't knee-jerk reacted to anything, they let a third party (Epic) be the first to show off something truly next-gen running on the PS5. That's all pretty smart, IMO.

I think MS has a narrative though. It has a lot of power. MS needs to start building upon that foundation though, sooner than later.
 

onQ123

Member
Why does the PlayStation 5 threads titles keep being changed from the names of the articles but it's ok for it to be a whole thread dedicated to trolling PS5?

That's pretty strange
 

ExpandKong

Banned
Is anyone else slightly alarmed that Sony is foisting upon us yet another (mostly) proprietary storage solution but we’re all somehow eating it up this time? 🤔
 
Is anyone else slightly alarmed that Sony is foisting upon us yet another (mostly) proprietary storage solution but we’re all somehow eating it up this time? 🤔

You'll be able to buy compatible SSDs from different brands off the shelf. Just gotta make sure the SSD matches the requirements for the PS5. Hopefully compatible drives will be available at launch or near launch, from what I understand they aren't out in the wild yet.

it's ok for it to be a whole thread dedicated to trolling PS5?

Are you referring to the meme thread? I think the point of that thread was/is to keep it all contained in one place and not spilling over into every next gen related thread, which seems to have worked for the most part. There is plenty of meme'ing in the Speculation OT too, everything seems alright/fair?
 
Last edited:

Sethbacca

Member
I've barely touched games like GTA and RDR because the wait to load them is fucking awful on console and they're generally the type of games I prefer to play on my TV instead of my PC. If nothing else, certain games will at least not put me off from playing them by virtue of the sheer load time involved in starting a game when I just want to play.
 
Last edited:

onQ123

Member
You'll be able to buy compatible SSDs from different brands off the shelf. Just gotta make sure the SSD matches the requirements for the PS5. Hopefully compatible drives will be available at launch or near launch, from what I understand they aren't out in the wild yet.



Are you referring to the meme thread? I think the point of that thread was/is to keep it all contained in one place and not spilling over into every next gen related thread, which seems to have worked for the most part. There is plenty of meme'ing in the Speculation OT too, everything seems alright/fair?

Well it's not working because every PS5 thread get flooded with trolls
 

onQ123

Member
Changed it to a less clickbaity title, and put the article that did not omit his full quote in the forefront.

As for trolls, report them.

So a thread called "PlayStation 5 Is 100 Times Faster Than PS4, Says Sony" is click bait but a thread called "Xbox Game Pass is five times more popular than PlayStation Now" isn't?

Like if I make a thread about PS5 I/O it gets trolled & locked but the Xbox I/O thread stands the test of time
 

oldergamer

Member
So a thread called "PlayStation 5 Is 100 Times Faster Than PS4, Says Sony" is click bait but a thread called "Xbox Game Pass is five times more popular than PlayStation Now" isn't?

Like if I make a thread about PS5 I/O it gets trolled & locked but the Xbox I/O thread stands the test of time
Agree on your first point, but not the second point. The reason it might get locked is because there's 20 or 30 threads started about PS5 SSD, many of them were troll threads without any actual info.
 

Entroyp

Member
Hold on, wasn’t there a dev that told us open world games were impossible on PS5? Hmm someone’s lying here...
 

Mod of War

Ω
Staff Member
So a thread called "PlayStation 5 Is 100 Times Faster Than PS4, Says Sony" is click bait but a thread called "Xbox Game Pass is five times more popular than PlayStation Now" isn't?

Like if I make a thread about PS5 I/O it gets trolled & locked but the Xbox I/O thread stands the test of time

Nobody reported the GamePass one as clickbait. 🤷‍♀️
 
Showing a lack of understanding what CPU and GPU do. CPUs and GPUs load and process data. Storage stores data. When a CPU needs data, it loads the data from the storage into memory before processing it.

His statement was quite very clear. There is no room to misinterpret it or claim it was a misspelling or misunderstanding. The only misunderstanding here is you and your having "fun".

It is very very clear they are talking about data processing, not graphics processing but the speed at which data can be moved from storage and processed. It is 100X faster on PS5 when compared to PS4.
ExkrceI.jpg

That's helped me alot. Thank you for that.
 

Md Ray

Member
Can't help but feel that this will get quoted a thousand times when there's a new DF vid of PS4 vs PS5 game comparison showing minor difference in early cross-gen games.
 
Like if I make a thread about PS5 I/O it gets trolled & locked but the Xbox I/O thread stands the test of time

There are dozens of “PS5 SSD” threads. There is one XsX velocity architecture thread

Goliathy’s “UE5 demo is 1440p on PS5” seemed to get reported and locked with the quickness. I don’t see how you could say there’s something working against Sony here

let’s not forget stuff like the “PS5 is going to have better graphics“ thread that pure biased speculation
 
Last edited:
It would be really nice to see 2-4 seconds loading times for next gen games, but I believe it when I see it.

Random reads of SSDs are not in the GB/s range, so if a game needs to load 5GB of small assets then we'll still see loading screens.
 

Mod of War

Ω
Staff Member
Ask any mod have I ever reported a thread or post & ask any member have they ever got any messages from me about another member

Not that I recall. We are not completely ignorant to the underlying meta of "cliques" that form, and come & go in targeted waves.
 

Psykodad

Banned
i dont see why anyone would report either thread as clickbait. both are accurate, this is a direct quote from a Sony's CEO. just because someone got triggered by the truth doesnt mean we have to appease them. they need to grow a pair.

just my two cents.
Reporting is petty childish shit by default.
 

ZywyPL

Banned
Showing a lack of understanding what CPU and GPU do. CPUs and GPUs load and process data. Storage stores data. When a CPU needs data, it loads the data from the storage into memory before processing it.

His statement was quite very clear. There is no room to misinterpret it or claim it was a misspelling or misunderstanding. The only misunderstanding here is you and your having "fun".

It is very very clear they are talking about data processing, not graphics processing but the speed at which data can be moved from storage and processed. It is 100X faster on PS5 when compared to PS4.
ExkrceI.jpg

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't vast majority of people here wanted from next-gen games advanced AI, advanced physics, advanced destruction, advanced interactions etc. not so long ago? Things the SSD cannot help with? I thought people didn't want pretty looking but empty and dead worlds all over again?

And once the SSD hype took off some people brought up genuine concerns that if you stream the assets on the fly they will be static, non-interactive ones, or the GPU won't be even able to show all the details, and well, the UE5 showed that's exactly the case...

So I don't know, maybe at the end of the day that's what people truly want, pretty pixels and nothing more. Well I know I don't, I want to see another technical jump comparable to HL2 and Crysis, and that's not what SSD can help to achieve. We will see in the upcoming months how it plays out, there are some devs who did marvelous things on PS3/X360 but the Jaguar cut their wings this gen, but I believe they can deliver what I personally consider as true "next-gen".
 

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
I am sorry call me old fashioned, boomer, etc. But if anything teasing capabilities of HW on open world, is something I DO NOT WANT to hear. Because Open World games reaching for a long time limitation on human side, because even something which takes literally thousands of people building for years is still the same barren wasteland like the other games. I fear open-world games more than MP games, when it comes to popularity.

Was is so fucking hard to create Codemned: CO or fucking Darkness? If you want something more "high-end" of the gaming, what about fucking Max Payne III.... nobody? Yeah well it's just me then. Most of ten then not open-world games are terrible lonesome experience.

After all, the best open world games of this gen is Infamous Second Son. So might say it's rather simplistic, but fuck that. I don't need anything bigger. Saints row's does it right and I have The Third Pre-ordered and ready to go, to eat my fucking 'memberries, how awesome it was when people were constrained by power. Sound stupid? Well then give me something like Control...give me physics, give me fun. Not something you are going to boast about how big of a world you have there. Or...

Well, incidentally, Just Cause 2 is one of my favorite games ever and well I could not even handle JC4 for more than couple hours.
 
Last edited:

Tripolygon

Banned
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't vast majority of people here wanted from next-gen games advanced AI, advanced physics, advanced destruction, advanced interactions etc. not so long ago? Things the SSD cannot help with? I thought people didn't want pretty looking but empty and dead worlds all over again?
Faster storage helps in everything. The faster you can move a lot of data, the faster you can work on it that is why bandwidth keeps increasing. 8 core 16 thread Zen 2 CPU in next gen consoles offer those opportunities for advanced AI, advanced physics, advanced destruction, advanced interactions etc. Next gen consoles have more than 5x CPU performance increase. Also people wanted faster loading times. Developers also wanted a move from HDD to SSD because that offers more possibilities for game design not possible on current gen, even though most thought it wouldn't be possible at first. The faster you can move a lot of data also means the less data you have parked in RAM waiting to be used.

And once the SSD hype took off some people brought up genuine concerns that if you stream the assets on the fly they will be static, non-interactive ones, or the GPU won't be even able to show all the details, and well, the UE5 showed that's exactly the case...
There is no genuine concern. Games stream in assets on the fly currently. During that demo didn't you see the world crumbling when the character was flying through it?

So I don't know, maybe at the end of the day that's what people truly want, pretty pixels and nothing more. Well I know I don't, I want to see another technical jump comparable to HL2 and Crysis, and that's not what SSD can help to achieve. We will see in the upcoming months how it plays out, there are some devs who did marvelous things on PS3/X360 but the Jaguar cut their wings this gen, but I believe they can deliver what I personally consider as true "next-gen".
Next gen consoles have 3.5+GHz 8 core 16 thread Zen 2 CPU. That is a proper generational leap that allows for vastly more advanced physics and A.I, animation and vastly more interactive world. But it is up to developers now to make it happen.
 
Last edited:

Andodalf

Banned
There is no genuine concern. Games stream in assets on the fly currently. During that demo didn't you see the world crumbling when the character was flying through it?

The question is in regards to deformation. When a rock falls it’s the same rock just moving in space. Same shape and whatnot, just moving in the scene. Destruction is just multiple unchanging models that looked like the one whole model, no real change happens to any one model. Their tech would need to work differently for things that need to move, such as the player model, or foliage, which is why they demo didn’t focus on those things
 

Tripolygon

Banned
The question is in regards to deformation. When a rock falls it’s the same rock just moving in space. Same shape and whatnot, just moving in the scene. Destruction is just multiple unchanging models that looked like the one whole model, no real change happens to any one model. Their tech would need to work differently for things that need to move, such as the player model, or foliage, which is why they demo didn’t focus on those things
That's a whole different discussion not in the purview of this thread. If you want to discuss Unreal Engine 5, tag me in a discussion in that thread.

edit: There is a lot we don't know about Unreal Engine 5. The demo says they use their chaos physics engine which uses pre-fractured geometry with rigid body physics applied. That's how almost every game does it. They have not said if Nanite only applies to static geometry only and cannot be applied to objects that are dynamic. Even if that is true, that does not mean they cannot use a combination of different techs to achieve a world that uses Nanite for static geometry and something else for dynamic bodies.
 
Last edited:

Exodia

Banned
yeah its 100x if you naively believe that next gen games will still stick to using mostly 512 and 1024 textures.
What's actually going to happen is that 4k textures will be used alot more. So "100x" is just pure marketing.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom