No, more options for less price.
You can buy either the Series S and play at 1080p or 1440p like those 2080ti users you were defending before.
Or buy a Series X and play at greater resolutions.
Again, you have more options.
As a consumer looking to make a purchase you have more options if you have the money. If you don't have the money you have less options. It's normal, hence less money less options. Microsoft are creating an avenue for people with less money here but the primary goal of the system is to create an entry point for gamepass. If they were only concerned about people having the best possible "next gen" experience then the Series X would be the only option on the table.
Companies pump millions into RnD because it's profitable. Like you said: they aren't humanitarian.
Not always, hence it's a speculative investment. If they only wanted to make money then stagnation is actually the best option, especially with technology. That's how Apple make so much money, they repackage old phone hardware as something "new" - no RnD cost, instant profitability. Thankfully for most technology companies competition exists, so it doesn't allow anyone to be absolutely stagnant.
I have already given those reasons across the threads.
TL;DR: Specs + resolution target explains everything.
If you have I'd appreciate being pointed in the direction of those posts. I've been courteous enough to ensure you have had a direct reference to things I've previously said when I've preferred to not repeat myself. Specs and a resolution target don't explain anything, it's the results from said technology that we are looking for. And in this case in particular we are talking about the implications this technology will have on the higher spec'd consoles and GPU's for the games that will be developed for all of them.
The fundamental question is will we see the same leap that we typically see when there is a generation leap? Based on the specs of the lowest powered system that needs to be catered for, the answer to that would be no. It would represent possibly the smallest jump we have ever seen.
Who says the Series S is going to have more fps?
I don't think you're understanding the example I'm providing.
It's about having more FPS than if the same game were to run on the same system at 4k. Simply decreasing the resolution and leaving everything else the same is not enough in a lot of cases, not everything scales with resolution.
Flight Sim 2020 is a prime example of that. You can end up in a scenario where a game is perfectly playable on the higher end system but on the low end system you have something that is unplayable even when you take it down to lower resolutions. If simply decreasing the resolution doesn't remedy the problem that means you need to look at other optimisations, other settings or in a worst case scenario altering the design of the game itself. All of that involves work, it involves time.
To avoid that headache, you can develop around a lower spec target and then work your way up. Provided your engine isn't a mess, it's easier to bolt things on than it is to shave things off. It's also less demoralising. Having to literally cut away bits of work that you've done is the worst feeling in the world.
Hence I earlier gave examples where games built around high end PC's used to end up severely compromised when being ported to consoles. That is what can
really happen when you prioritise a high end system.
I haven't made a single ad hominem against you, I guess you meant strawmans. And also that isn't true neither, I described what you have been doing. Filling the thread with extreme negativity against the console claiming all kinds of shortcomings by your own made up speculation and claiming that the devs of the console are lying because what they said doesn't fit your negative narrative, among other things.
You insist that you want to have a meaningful conversation, but so far you haven't said anything actually meaningful. Why are we supposed to believe you over the devs of MS? You haven't made any real argument to support your speculations, they are just speculations based on more speculations (and probably wishful thinking).
You are attempting to make this personal for whatever reason instead of sticking to the actual topic we are discussing, that's an ad hominem.
I can see that you don't like that I'm not positive about this system. It's no secret that I'm not in favour of it being a real thing going into next gen. This is actually a thread where the reasons why I'm not in favour of it are being discussed, sorry if it upsets you. It's not wishful thinking because I'd rather a scenario where what's being discussed wasn't the case, that is where you are completely off the mark. As I said before, if somehow the developers find a way to work with the system in a way that they can do things just as they would if developing for a console that was much more powerful then I'd be happy to be wrong. I'm talking from my own perspective of being a software developer, and as a lifelong PC gamer where in some cases "turn the resolution down bro" or "lower the settings bro" can do nothing. Until we are deep into next gen and are in a position to reflect on how the introduction of a lower spec'd console may or may not have had an impact on the development of next gen games then that's all we can do for now, discuss it.
So here we are, talking about
me instead of the topic. It's what you wanted though huh? Good work.
Also as for this:
claiming that the devs of the console are lying because what they said doesn't fit your negative narrative, among other things.
Show me where.