• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[DF] - Borderlands 3 PS5 vs Xbox Series X: 4K60 and 120fps Modes Tested - Plus Series S Comparisons!

Team Blue in here claiming the win despite DF literally saying the Xbox wins is hilarious.

From the article:

The bottom line? Both consoles are prone to fluctuations at 120Hz, some kicking in harder on Series X at points, others on PS5 - but on the whole it is Series X with a lead, while PS5 has a small selection of visual improvements and faster loading times. For anyone looking at getting the best 120Hz performance though, the vote has to go on Series X. For the higher baseline performance, and having VRR, it has an advantage. There's little to split the two in 60fps, but 120Hz gives Microsoft's machine an identifiable plus.

It's like there's nuance to the discussion and there's no clear winner especially if DF needs to qualify XS' win with the idea you have VRR on your TV.

See above, advantage Xbox with or without VRR.
 
Last edited:
From the article:

The bottom line? Both consoles are prone to fluctuations at 120Hz, some kicking in harder on Series X at points, others on PS5 - but on the whole it is Series X with a lead, while PS5 has a small selection of visual improvements and faster loading times. For anyone looking at getting the best 120Hz performance though, the vote has to go on Series X. For the higher baseline performance, and having VRR, it has an advantage. There's little to split the two in 60fps, but 120Hz gives Microsoft's machine an identifiable plus.



See above, advantage Xbox with or without VRR.

If 60 is the same why not give PS5 the advantage for better textures, foliage density, etc.? Is it because they don't even mention those issues?
 

JORMBO

Darkness no more
All these comparison videos pretty much look the same between the two. We're down to "there's an extra patch of grass over there" as one of the only differences.
 

Evilms

Banned
If 60 is the same why not give PS5 the advantage for better textures, foliage density, etc.? Is it because they don't even mention those issues?

Just another big damage control by DF, Series X has no advantage, so to balance things out a bit they cite the vrr which 99% of players will not have this option.

On the other hand the PS5 which has better shadows, better grass density, faster loadings, + dualsense... it doesn't count
p6zKFpN.png
 
Last edited:
This „nuance“ doesnt seem to exist whenever PS5 has a slight advantage.

In the CoD thread I said myself it's a problem the 60FPS mode isn't up to snuff but then it turned out all the drops came post-patch and can often be fixed by restarting a checkpoint, meaning the drops are an error that can be fixed. That said I was giving X the edge, myself before that stuff came out. Very few people are taking actual advantage of 120FPS modes or have VRR so the ideal for now is to have a great 60FPS mode and since Borderlands 3 on PS5 has better IQ on PS5 at 60FPS and shorter load times I'd call it a win, of course if you need it to be a factual win we all agree on it's not going to happen, maybe you have a VRR TV at 120hz and prefer the game in that mode even with worse IQ, it's your prerogative.
 

Redlancet

Banned
So funny to see Team Sony screaming victory no matter the outcome, a la Trump. DF could say skip the ps5 version and they would say “another win for Sony”.
I’d just like to point that according to DF, Xbox takes this one because series S is best at 60 and series X is best at 120.
after all the fuss xbox fans have been doing this past year...even a tie (if its one) its a win,so take the L and be gratious about it,lose with style son
 

sircaw

Banned
Just another big damage control by DF, Series X has no advantage, so to balance things out a bit they cite the vrr which 99% of players will not have this option.

On the other hand the PS5 which has better shadows, grass density, fast loadings, dualsense... it doesn't count
p6zKFpN.png

Look at this post above, this user hits the nail on the head, and people always say well i don't know why people think digital foundry are bias or something.

How is it possible for them to miss out on those features, they are fucking MASSIVE.

What the hell is digital foundry doing sometimes is a wonder to me.
 

Cherrypepsi

Member
Just another big damage control by DF, Series X has no advantage, so to balance things out a bit they cite the vrr which 99% of players will not have this option.

On the other hand the PS5 which has better shadows, better grass density, faster loadings, + dualsense... it doesn't count
p6zKFpN.png

No, it all doesnt count.

I think after today's comparison it's safe to say that xbox won this generation.

vsMJbmD.jpg
 

LMJ

Member
Yeah... not seeing how the Sex would get a "win" here (because its a war you see lol) as the PS5 clearly looks better overall but performs slightly worse due to a feature that will be patched later? (VRR)

Seems at most this would be a draw, or more accurately a win regardless of console...as I imagine more patches will come for both
 

Evilms

Banned
Look at this post above, this user hits the nail on the head, and people always say well i don't know why people think digital foundry are bias or something.

How is it possible for them to miss out on those features, they are fucking MASSIVE.

What the hell is digital foundry doing sometimes is a wonder to me.

After that it's only Tom's opinion, but the differences between the two versions speak for themselves, lying and tampering doesn't help.

I hope Vg Tech and NXG will look into this.
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
Look at this post above, this user hits the nail on the head, and people always say well i don't know why people think digital foundry are bias or something.

How is it possible for them to miss out on those features, they are fucking MASSIVE.

What the hell is digital foundry doing sometimes is a wonder to me.

So then you agree devil may cry is better on XsX then ?

Lol. Goal posts on jet skis!
 
You won’t see the difference until games are designed to take advantage of the larger number of CU’s the XSX delivers. This reminds me of the early days of Dual Core CPUs vs Quad Core CPUs, for years the Dual Core CPUs that had higher clocks kicked the ass of Quad Core CPUs that were more expensive but only delivered on synthetic multi-core benchmarks.


Stop talking about things u have no idea about, u sound like a sore loser, face it, it is just a badly designed hardware, apart first party no one is going to design a game around xsx, and they shouldn't need to, ms have messed up here.
 

Elios83

Member
LOL Tom is the same guy who couldn't care less about PS5 having an edge in 120Hz on COD while he was all shouting about the PS5 having some drops in 60fps RT (because of a bug)!
This guy is eager to claim Xbox has some advantages, his bias is so obvious.
The reality is basically a tie/ overall win for PS5 with better graphics, faster loadings and same performance at 60Hz while a few drops more in 120Hz.
Again the usual crew who continue to expect XSX to have actual wins are the only losers.
 

huraga

Banned
LOL Tom is the same guy who couldn't care less about PS5 having an edge in 120Hz on COD while he was all shouting about the PS5 having some drops in 60fps RT (because of a bug)!
This guy is eager to claim Xbox has some advantages, his bias is so obvious.
The reality is basically a tie/ overall win for PS5 with better graphics, faster loadings and same performance at 60Hz while a few drops more in 120Hz.
Again the usual crew who continue to expect XSX to have actual wins are the only losers.

overall wi?? please don´t be trolll, 3s faster a load (it´s ridiculous) and what better graphics???? two plants more??? please objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
Yeah, the load times on PS5 are nice.

I had to keep both PS4 and PS5 versions installed until the only transfer one character over issue was fixed. Whatever the case was, it's no longer an issue for me. The PS4 is now deleted.

PS5 version is about 20GB smaller than PS4, and that's with me having an extra DLC on PS5 I didn't have on PS4.

DualSense triggers are nice. Can tell the difference between guns by the trigger.
 

NullZ3r0

Banned
Have to admit i genuinely thought there would be a noticeable difference in Cross platform games between XSX vs PS5, wonder if it really is down to the tools on Xbox simply not being as good (for now) as the ones on Sony's machine but for an extra 2tf I was expecting a bigger difference
Devs are just porting the previous Gen game and tweaking the performance. I had this suspicion before, but now its confirmed.
 

Elios83

Member
overall wi?? please don´t be trolll, 3s faster a load (it´s ridiculous) and what better graphics???? two plants more??? please objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity!!!!!!!!

Just read the summary.
Better shadows, foliage density, better loadings on PS5. Convincing DualSense implementation that can't be replicated on Xbox.
Same performance at 60fps, both have drops at 120Hz and perform similarly with a few more drops on PS5.
The same 120Hz performance that no one cared about in COD :messenger_tears_of_joy:
If this isn't an overall tie or slight win for PS5 I don't know what it is.
It's hilarious to see some people desperate to find victories for XSX that are simply not happening.
 

bxrz

Member
XboxGAF last week - CoD is better because the majority of the gamers won't play in 120fps mode
XBoxGAF Today - 120fps mode is more stable and it gives XsX the win.

:messenger_grinning_smiling:
You could say the opposite for Sony fanboys lmao

All I've been seeing on here is "The only thing that matters is consistent frames". Now you don't have consistent frames and its "better foliage density" (whatever the hell that means)
 
Last edited:

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
Hmmm, didn't someone in another thread say Grass Gate was back?

Damn, it really is....the more things change, the more they stay the same...
 

DavidGzz

Member
Wait, I know the response to this, I saw it so often in the CoD match-up for team green... "everyone plays on 60FPS mode, no one has TVs that can do 120FPS"

I saw the exact same argument from people jealous about Warzone being 120 on XSX only. People change arguments depending on what suits them best. If XSX had more foliage you'd have the blue team saying "oh wow, tufts of grass that no one will notice, gimme that silky smoove 120fps, Xbox loses again lol!"
 

Romulus

Member
If 60 is the same why not give PS5 the advantage for better textures, foliage density, etc.? Is it because they don't even mention those issues?

Not to mention the drops in frames when above 90fps aren't that noticeable, and when they're already wild to begin with it just makes it difficult to gave a real advantage.

Not only that, is the extra foliage being rendered further on PS5? That could easily be the reason why.
 
Last edited:

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
No, it all doesnt count.

I think after today's comparison it's safe to say that xbox won this generation.

vsMJbmD.jpg
I cannot wait for Halo: Infinite for Craig our savior to became more than just a face from one screenshot. It's given, that he is mascot of this gen.

But obviously there is this on same engine:
2vLBI8U.jpg


Which got fixed later on if not mistaken. But yeah, draw calls were called out multiple times past gen.
 
Last edited:

huraga

Banned
Just read the summary.
Better shadows, foliage density, better loadings on PS5. Convincing DualSense implementation that can't be replicated on Xbox.
Same performance at 60fps, both have drops at 120Hz and perform similarly with a few more drops on PS5.
The same 120Hz performance that no one cared about in COD :messenger_tears_of_joy:
If this isn't an overall tie or slight win for PS5 I don't know what it is.
It's hilarious to see some people desperate to find victories for XSX that are simply not happening.
Well it´s your opinion... only that, one more opinion.
 

Mr Moose

Member
Drop the shadow quality for better performance.
This is the first patch for the next gen versions? They normally improve it over time so its looking good for all versions here.

#GrassGate is back, #BirdGate with Call of Duty. Fun.
 
Digital VRRundry. HUGE WIN!

DMC5:SE 120 fps. (not sure what's going here... maybe a bug?) :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Ever since Richard Leadbetter put the VRR talking point out there on the PS5 Review you just knew they would be driving this narrative to exhaustion.

Huge W, thanks to VRR "smoothing", and to dispel the obvious, cherry picking of a scene even though it fluctuates all over the place as seen on those frame-grapths.

Why not give VGTech-like average breakdowns? More than capable.
 
Last edited:

AnotherOne

Member
So ps5 inherited the ps4 pro foliage and shadows advantage that it had over xbone x while xsx has better fps in 120fps, can't seem to go wrong with either version but I'm disappointed even at 1080p we can't get a lock 120fps or close to it :/
 
overall wi?? please don´t be trolll, 3s faster a load (it´s ridiculous) and what better graphics???? two plants more??? please objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity objectivity!!!!!!!!
Objectively is it has two more plants and slightly better shadows... How ironic can one be?

The non-objective thing to do it to deny the factual differences and virtually scream at people.
 
Top Bottom