• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Breaking: Microsoft to acquire Activision-Blizzard in near 70$ billion deal

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
So are we getting new Tony hawk games now?

My biggest hope is that MS recognises that the Vicarious Visions talent are absolutely wasted as a COD support team and gives them back the independence to make Spyro 4, Crash 5 and, at the very least, THPS 3+4 remakes.

No way MS leaves those IPs on the table. No way. Having Spyro and Crash be Xbox exclusives is way too juicy an opportunity to pass up.
 
Last edited:

Aion002

Member
Twitch Thats Good GIF by Hyper RPG
 

Chukhopops

Member
Anyone who thinks this struck a huge blow to Sony is misunderstanding the acquisition. MS made it very clear that CoD will likely remain multi-platform, so the only thing Sony is losing really is marketing rights. This won't really affect players too much, which is a good thing imo. A franchise like CoD being segregated to one console would be a pretty shitty move.
Source pls
 

kingpotato

Ask me about my Stream Deck
bro, despite all the disgusting shit at Activision I highly doubt you believe, or anyone else believes, that one of the most successful gaming companies is a sinking ship…
I was thinking more of Blizzard specifically, and again maybe the financials make sense, but that company/department is not on the rise.
 
Done deal but not quite done:

“Until we receive all the necessary regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions are satisfied, which we expect to be sometime in Microsoft’s fiscal 2023 year ending June 30, 2023, we will continue to operate completely autonomously.”-Activision internal email

I don’t see the FTC blocking this. MS can use game pass to prove them expanding the market vs contracting it, as well as support for switch.
 

Lognor

Banned
Granted they probably will put COD on PlayStation. I’d bet money on that. We’ve seen how marketing rights lead to succes

bro, despite all the disgusting shit at Activision I highly doubt you believe, or anyone else believes, that one of the most successful gaming companies is a sinking ship…
I'll bet money on it too. They won't. You were probably saying the same thing about Elder Scrolls and Starfield and we know how that turned out. MS did not pay all this money to continue to put these games on their competitor's system.

There is a massive audience that only plays COD and they will buy an Xbox to continue to play it.
 
S

SpongebobSquaredance

Unconfirmed Member
yeah, Phil gets the good and the bad side. I do hope MS gets rid of Bobby as soon as possible and implements a better workplace setup.
yes absolutely, I hope they clean up the dirt from Activision
 

Hunnybun

Member
Having a platform is still a profitable business. Most of MS and Sony's revenue comes from the cut they get on 3rd party software. The rub is, can MS actually make more $$ by basically dissolving their 15b a year operation in favor of becoming a third-party on PS? Or would they rather try and become PS and build towards a console operation that rivals PS as is. As big as Activision is, MS's console operation was already a bigger revenue generator, that's the power of being a platform holder. Plus they have PC and the future of "virtual Xbox customers" via streaming.

I know it's profitable: that's why I'd see a move to concentrating on GP as an extension of that. They'd still be getting the cut of 3P sales, just via GP subs and not commission on individual transactions. But they'd extend that to the entire market rather than like 30%.
 

Neo_game

Member
This is absolutely horrible news to wake up to. Even if they decide to put games on other platforms, we're going to see a lot of franchises turn into the end game of mediocre games as services since that's the direction Phil Spencer has put Xbox.

I know what you mean. Monopoly is not good and what if they buy EA, Ubisoft as well in future. Surely they have to find a way to screw the gamers wit subscription, DLC's to make all those billion $ investment.
 

DaGwaphics

Member
Anyone who thinks this struck a huge blow to Sony is misunderstanding the acquisition. MS made it very clear that CoD will likely remain multi-platform, so the only thing Sony is losing really is marketing rights. This won't really affect players too much, which is a good thing imo. A franchise like CoD being segregated to one console would be a pretty shitty move.

I wouldn't underestimate what a move like this could do for Xbox, even if the majority of the software stays available on PS. That's quite a value proposition for Casual gamers, pay $70 on PS or get the game on GP with Xbox while probably getting extra perks (early access to additional content, exclusive additional content, etc.).
 

MScarpa

Member
This would be a nightmare to get theough if it goes to Congress for anti competitive stuff.

I don't see cod being exclusive, I'm sure it would be a timed exclusive
Learn to spell "through" before you comment on congress and exclusivity.
 

Buggy Loop

Member
Next up : Get Spider-Man franchise back to Treyarch for the ultimate anime betrayal 🤣

Give Jedi knight to Raven Software

Relax a bit with the focus on multi-billion franchises, keep CoD going, but let these amazing developers go back to do what they like.
 
Woah. Huge get.

Sony better get their asses together. Bethesda was one thing, but getting Activision Blizzard is gargantuan. Especially, with the casual gamers.
 
Great for you guys on xbox sucks for the rest of us

It's also coming to Playstation. Microsoft won't make this exclusive to Xbox. Be happy, this means your Activision games will no longer cost $70. Prices will be dropped down to $60, just like all other Microsoft first party games. So this is already going to end up eventually helping Playstation Gamers. With help from Microsoft, COD is likely to get better releases, and potentially more time to cook.
 
Top Bottom