• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Testers at Activision-owned Raven Software have voted to form the U.S. video game industry's first major union.

8BiTw0LF

Banned
peterhermann charlesbrooks GIF by YoungerTV
 

Jaybe

Member
I bet a other teams under Activision that want this will push for it hard in the near-term. They know Activision probably doesn’t care much to use negative tactics now that they are being acquired.
 

Fuz

Banned
As a scandinavian I’m apalled by the fact that unions weren’t a thing before this
Muricans.

But this time they're not totally wrong. In Italy unions played a huge part in defending workers' rights after the war. They really did a lot. Then they become political, and now they're as corrupt as it gets. They're just lackeys of big industrialists.
 
Last edited:

Dane

Member
As a scandinavian I’m apalled by the fact that unions weren’t a thing before this
In my country (Brazil) workers and bosses were forced to pay union dues by law, everyone hated it, never saw any benefit and the money was entirely dedicated to union bosses and their political goals, nothing was ever done for employees. We have (or had) the highest number of unions because they wanted to get that free money.
 
Nah they're safe. No one would ever dare cross a 19 person strong picket line for the chance to get paid to find bugs in videogames. :lollipop_raising_hand:
It seems like a really stressful job, honestly. And thankless.

But now the question is how does Activision plan to get around this, as they definitely don't want this setting a precedent.
 

NickFire

Member
It seems like a really stressful job, honestly. And thankless.

But now the question is how does Activision plan to get around this, as they definitely don't want this setting a precedent.
Adopting a policy of using only 3rd party contract labor as needed for testing is my serious guess.

My not serious guess would be to copy "other" publishers and use pre-orders for bug testing. Or maybe this is my serious guess? :lollipop_hushed:
 

cormack12

Gold Member
Hmmmm, can see it dragging out for 18 months at least. At which point the company will probably say '...as part of our new strategy we will be outsourcing the QA, given the success of WFH'.

Or they can let them strike, not pay them and get contractors. Fuelling point 1.

QA is not the 'talent' in the studio, nor scarce in resource sadly. Some jobs are just thankless and have a low ceiling of entry.
 

ANDS

King of Gaslighting
As a scandinavian I’m apalled by the fact that unions weren’t a thing before this

Of course unions are a thing in this country.

Muricans.

But this time they're not totally wrong. In Italy unions played a huge part in defending workers' rights after the war. They really did a lot. Then they become political, and now they're as corrupt as it gets. They're just lackeys of big industrialists.

Unions in "Murica" are some of the strongest bodies in this country and are ubiquitous with numerous industries (including the all levels of gubment). That a small group of people were able to stand up against what was almost surely withering pushback (relative to their numbers) from management, is pretty impressive.
 

skit_data

Member
Of course unions are a thing in this country
I’m not so uncivilised to think unions aren’t a thing in America but the games industry is going on 30-40 years at this point. I expected unions to have popped up at least in the mid 00s.
 
Last edited:

Daytonabot

Banned
They are testers of course they want to unionize probably overworked and underpaid, but you won't see alot of developers complaining because they get paid well
Supply and demand are the only things that determine whether someone is underpaid, and potential testers are not even remotely in short supply.
 
Last edited:

ANDS

King of Gaslighting
I’m not so uncivilised to think unions aren’t a thing in America but the games industry is going on 30-40 years at this point. I expected unions to have popped up at least in the mid 00s.

You have to unionize first; it's like the bit with Amazon - short of illegal union busting, they did everything possible to keep their workers from unionizing. And failed (at least at one warehouse). It is easy for that spark of rebellion to get snuffed out though so it's not that surprising to me that it took this long to hit video games.

The real interesting question is whether or not it will actually lead to other workers pushing back (and putting their necks on the line) and agreeing to this.
 
I’m not so uncivilised to think unions aren’t a thing in America but the games industry is going on 30-40 years at this point. I expected unions to have popped up at least in the mid 00s.
The whole idea about unions is about underpaid mass labor.

IT usually has higher salary and you can negotiate even more, or switch company for even more pay and benefits. So no point for union as most people can find a better offer. Unions in general does not work that great for jobs like IT because it supposed to be skill based, but with unionization it boils down to union negotiation power rather than skil.
 
Last edited:

HoodWinked

Member
this is only because of the leverage they have in the current environment.

record job openings, Activision lawsuits, pending Microsoft acquisition

i'd imagine management doesn't care until the acquisition is done. then they'll make a decision.
 

PhaseJump

Banned
Seems like this is just making hay.

This symbolic win will have no immediate or measurable impact on the industry, and only serves to shovel shit into the furnace that fuels the down-trodden narrative politically motivated tweeters gaming journalists are chasing to get clicks from the overlap of unskilled/no-skill job lifers, and bleeding heart liberals. As if burning their money on union dues will somehow solve problems.

This is a world where software is patched in an easily accessible way, and quality assurance before shipping anything entertainment related, or even mainstream operating systems, is a bad joke. Entry level testers could be out of a job entirely.
Unless I'm wrong and I'm missing something here. I mean, it's not like I intentionally clicked on and read anything written by fuckface Schreier, or that I think he has the ability to sway my assessment of how the real world works.
 

Grildon Tundy

Gold Member
Hmmmm, can see it dragging out for 18 months at least. At which point the company will probably say '...as part of our new strategy we will be outsourcing the QA, given the success of WFH'.

Or they can let them strike, not pay them and get contractors. Fuelling point 1.

QA is not the 'talent' in the studio, nor scarce in resource sadly. Some jobs are just thankless and have a low ceiling of entry.
I wish there was a reaction emoji I could pick that means, "I agree with your take, although I wish it wasn't the case." A thumbs up doesn't accurately convey ambivalence.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Forming a union means nothing. It all comes down to if a company recognizes it as part of employee relations.

I'd just fire them and find good workers who arent unionized. Unionized workers are entitled. The kind of worker that drops everything they do at 5 pm. The stories my brothers told me long time when they worked at the post office as PT summer students. You wouldnt believe the shit the vets did and how little they worked. Yet at the time, posties got paid pretty well.

It's a pretty simple concept if you want a good job at decent pay. Get a role which you arent lumped in with tons other drones all willing to work or $15/hour.

Lots of people out there make decent money. Cant be that hard. You dont have to be a doctor or lawyer to make good coin. The dev team and IT people the QA people work beside probably make 3x or more what they make.

Companies will pay you good money if you are worth it. The money is there. Let's not pretend here that every company pays all their workers $9/hr. If that's all you get offered, you got shit skills because aside from fast food and shopping mall kinds of jobs, nobody gets paid that low.

The lowets job at my company are probably marketing assistants and junior analysts. They get paid around $60,000/yr CDN. Not saying that will make you a millionaire, but getting paid the equivalent of $30/hr to do some basic spreadsheets and rudimentary analysis, it cant be that hard to get a job that pays ok. Most of these people are lousy (young grads who are learning or those stodgy 40 or 50 year olds who cant get better)..... but still getting $60,000. If they can get hired any white collar dude can.

If a company is willing to outsource your job to another country to save a couple bucks, it shows your not as great as you think if some guy half way around the world who can barely speak english and relies on Skype to talk to the boss can do an equally or better job than you.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom