• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Last Of Us Part 2 has sold over 10 million units earlier this year according to Neil Druckmann | Factions 2 is now a standalone multiplayer game

Wohc

Banned
I think you're missing the point. This is what I was replying to:

That post is wrong except for games which flop because the majority of games are sold digitally, and relatively speaking very few gamers are buying games from the retailers you mentioned because most people either havent even heard of them, and because Amazon is like 100 times bigger 😁
You are right, i missed the point a little bit. Thought you think prices don't drop fast, but all big Sony AAAs drop to 30 bucks within very few month in Germany.

But Besides that i think you underestimate the commonness of those search engines and especially bargain sites like MyDealz. They are much bigger than you might think. MyDealz alone has many millions of visitors each month.

Just checked Amazon.de. Horizon is even 70 Euro from Amazon itself, but it starts in the 30s from Marketplace vendors. Even if people are not clever enough to use google or the mentioned sites for better prices, they at least have eyes and can see them on Amazon.

Also digital sales are not the majority, physical games are becoming stronger: https://gameranx.com/updates/id/281208/article/ps5-owners-prefer-physical-games-over-digital/
 

Dick Jones

Gold Member
I have concern™️

I need to platinum the PS4 version before considering this. Finally have to have a concentrated effort at getting the Factions trophies.
 
No Thank You Reaction GIF
atUpBWZ.gif
 

Nautilus

Banned
Wait what? TLOU2 wasn't $70. I don't even think everyone that bought it even paid $60 for it.
I also don't recall either Naughty Dog or Sony ever promising players Factions 2 upon their purchase of TLOU2.
Most assumed it would be a similar model to TLOU1 and Factions MP mode, but they ultimately had bigger plans for it.

Nautilus Nautilus Why do you have such a beef with these games? lol
Uh?Its not a beef.I'm just stating how horrible the second is, and that's not even a controversial opinion.

The few users here who think otherwise wasn't even mad about the points that I didn't like about the game, they were mad because I said I didn't like the game, even after I pointed out everything I thought was wrong with the game.

And after they couldn't argue back in proper manner, they started this witch hunt against me.
 

Ulysses 31

Member
Its kinda covered by the rapidity of how the situation escalates. Also it'd be bad writing not to factor in the relative normalcy and stability of life in Jackson not changing these characters. Death from exposure would be just a big a concern as being attacked by clickers or bandits, and there's also personal circumstance to factor in. Its perfectly in character for Joel to be more concerned for (or at least about) Ellie than himself and everything happens in this especially fraught period in their relationship - so there's always an element of distraction.
If we leave in place all the contrivances that lead Joel, Tommy and Abby to the house, there are things that could've been changed from there on that would make the brothers look like veterans and competent patrol guards.

I would expect living in Jackson would affect their character but not in ways that could bring more danger to them or that community. Each time they go on patrol should be a reminder what can happen to Jackson without adequate protection.

If his Ellie spats did affect his duties that much or he had become more sloppy over the years then I think we'd need to have had some hints of that where he did little mistakes and Tommy having to correct him. Now it just seems to come out of the blue.
The issue of contrivance that I highlighted earlier isn't that Joel fucks up and gets killed, its that Ellie is around to witness his execution at Abby's hands. That could happen off-screen and still function as an inciting event, but the way its set-up as this brutal tableau is in order to justify Ellie's descent into demon-hood or whatever!

The mistake is making out this whole situation is about Joel and his fate, when its really about Ellie and her emotions and mindset. As a character Joel will have long accepted that his life is likely to end sudden and bloody. Expecting him to be some sort of infallible hero figure is entirely unjustified based on the events of the previous game where he makes multiple mistakes and mainly survives out of sheer dumb luck.
I'm not partially against Joel dying because his past action, but when he does I'd at least expect it not to happen because he made such an easily avoidable mistake. Same thing for Tommy not endangering his brother so carelessly.
 

mortal

Gold Member
Uh?Its not a beef.I'm just stating how horrible the second is, and that's not even a controversial opinion.
That's more or less what having beef is, man lol.

You've already made it clear you don't like TLOU2, but I wanted to know why.
You don't have to go into an extensive explanation if you don't want to though.
 

Hugare

Member
Even 2 years later, in a thread about sales, you see people arguing about shit that happened in the game

Love to see it
 
I'm not partially against Joel dying because his past action, but when he does I'd at least expect it not to happen because he made such an easily avoidable mistake. Same thing for Tommy not endangering his brother so carelessly.
You say easily avoidable like all this other stuff didn't happen and he had the knowledge of the player. In the context of the events that happened, how would the end result been avoided?
 

kyliethicc

Member
I'm sure Naughty Dog appreciates all the attention haters give this game. They are helping promote the game and they don't even realize it.

star wars hate GIF
Well yeah as Druckmann said, he didn’t care if people loved it or hated it, he just didn’t want people to feel nothing.

Worst case scenario for any work of art is to be ignored and forgotten, having evoked little or no emotion.
 
Last edited:

Nautilus

Banned
That's more or less what having beef is, man lol.

You've already made it clear you don't like TLOU2, but I wanted to know why.
You don't have to go into an extensive explanation if you don't want to though.
Not liking something doesn't mean you have a beef with it lol. What seems like a beef is you guys not accepting that people can't like something you like and here we are 11 pages in.

I have already explained it in details, its just earlier in the thread, on page 5 or 6.You just have to go and look it up.
 
Well yeah as Druckmann said, he didn’t care if people loved it or hated it, he just didn’t want people to feel nothing.

Worst case scenario for any work of art is to be ignored and forgotten, having evoked little or no emotion.
I think that may be why some go to extremes to say it's all poorly executed. When in reality they didn't connect with or they projected what they would do onto characters that acted as themselves.
 
Not liking something doesn't mean you have a beef with it lol. What seems like a beef is you guys not accepting that people can't like something you like and here we are 11 pages in.

I have already explained it in details, its just earlier in the thread, on page 5 or 6.You just have to go and look it up.
You have a hard time understanding concepts or you just can't accept them.
0gglK4R.gif
 

Ulysses 31

Member
Is it not character of random people or the actual characters being discussed? They have a community to protect, but there also welcoming new comers. The rewrite you talk of just fills something that was perfectly filled. The fate is tragic already and fate was tempted doing a patrol in that weather. How would your scenario even come to any names being mentioned?
I'm mainly talking about Joel and Tommy, that they weren't acting in character with how fast they're trusting strangers in that apocalyptic setting.

Those strangers hadn't been vetted yet so I don't see how they were deserving of trust so easily. Killing infected doesn't mean you're trustworthy IMO. They were on patrol for bandits and infected so stumbling across a group of armed strangers is a security concern, especially when you're cut off from any support.

In my re-write the brothers would keep they distance from the other group(avoiding the mistake of getting surround) and the groups would probe each other for information. They feed each other BS info and tensions rise, Abby figures out Joel is Tommy's brother and a shoot out starts. The brothers put up a good fight(maybe even wound/kill a few of Abby's group) but Abby's group has advantage in numbers and tactical training and eventually disable the brothers with gunshot wounds. Then the rest would probably play out as seen in the game.
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight...

They're remaking the first game for PS5 only, but the second game will stay as just a PS4 game? They gotta at least bring that game up to speed as well with a native PS5 version right? I mean, it makes sense so they can sell both of them at the same time, right? Do you think that announcement will come later, or do you think it will just be a "by the way, there's now a PS5 version of TLOU2" and not make a big deal out of it?
 

Ulysses 31

Member
You say easily avoidable like all this other stuff didn't happen and he had the knowledge of the player. In the context of the events that happened, how would the end result been avoided?
Not in this case, Joel told his story what happened at the hospital in the beginning of the game so Tommy should be informed that people might be looking for him.
 
I'm mainly talking about Joel and Tommy, that they weren't acting in character with how fast they're trusting strangers in that apocalyptic setting.

Those strangers hadn't been vetted yet so I don't see how they were deserving of trust so easily. Killing infected doesn't mean you're trustworthy IMO. They were on patrol for bandits and infected so stumbling across a group of armed strangers is a security concern until, especially when you're cut off from any support.

In my re-write the brothers would keep they distance from the other group(avoiding the mistake of getting surround) and the groups would probe each other for information. They feed each other BS info and tensions rise, Abby figures out Joel is Tommy's brother and a shoot out starts. The brothers put up a good fight(maybe even wound/kill a few of Abby's group) but Abby's group has advantage in numbers and tactical training and eventually disable the brothers with gunshot wounds. Then the rest would probably play out as seen in the game.
So they stay out in the blizzard with a horde not far? Seem you might have overlooked some things.
 

Topher

Gold Member
So let me get this straight...

They're remaking the first game for PS5 only, but the second game will stay as just a PS4 game? They gotta at least bring that game up to speed as well with a native PS5 version right? I mean, it makes sense so they can sell both of them at the same time, right? Do you think that announcement will come later, or do you think it will just be a "by the way, there's now a PS5 version of TLOU2" and not make a big deal out of it?

I suspect there will eventually be a Director's cut of Part 2. Will probably coincide with a PC port. Just my guess.
 

Nautilus

Banned
You have a hard time understanding concepts or you just can't accept them.
0gglK4R.gif
Nah, its just tiring having to explain time and time again basic concepts to you guys, and only be replyed with toxic answers just like this one, because you can't get over the fact that I personally didn't like the game, and having to be the better person at the end to maintain a scrap of civility in this thread.

That's all.
 

Nautilus

Banned
So let me get this straight...

They're remaking the first game for PS5 only, but the second game will stay as just a PS4 game? They gotta at least bring that game up to speed as well with a native PS5 version right? I mean, it makes sense so they can sell both of them at the same time, right? Do you think that announcement will come later, or do you think it will just be a "by the way, there's now a PS5 version of TLOU2" and not make a big deal out of it?
Sony probably wants to distance themselves from TLOU 2 as much as possible, and want people to focus on TLOU which was universally loved.
 

mortal

Gold Member
Not liking something doesn't mean you have a beef with it lol.
Dude, that's literally the textbook definition of having beef.

What seems like a beef is you guys not accepting that people can't like something you like and here we are 11 pages in.

I have already explained it in details, its just earlier in the thread, on page 5 or 6.You just have to go and look it up.
How am I not accepting that? You kept reacting to my posts, so I was genuinely asking what you didn't like about the game, because I understand not everyone enjoyed it.
I wasn't even aware you posted earlier tbh, but I read your explanations though (y)
You're taking it as slight against you, and I don't even know why. I'm not out to get you, man. I promise lol
 

Rykan

Member
Sony probably wants to distance themselves from TLOU 2 as much as possible, and want people to focus on TLOU which was universally loved.
They literally referred to TLOU2 in the announcement of their next project and Elly of TLOU2 is features in the playstation banner. So no, they clearly don't want to distance themselves from one of their most successful games ever.
 

Nautilus

Banned
Dude, that's literally the textbook definition of having beef.


How am I not accepting that? You kept reacting to my posts, so I was genuinely asking what you didn't like about the game, because I understand not everyone enjoyed it.
I wasn't even aware you posted earlier tbh, but I read your explanations though (y)
You're taking it as slight against you, and I don't even know why. I'm not out to get you, man. I promise lol
I don't like fishes.I think they taste funny, weird.Does that mean I have a beef with all the fishes in the world? lol

I think you are confusing not liking something with hating it. I didn't like TLOU 2, and yes I think its a piece of shit, but I dont hate the game or the devs.I wish they do games that cater more to me, not hate them.

I'm not taking it as a slight, I'm just explaining it. You are just taking my replies in a very weird way lol.
 

Nautilus

Banned
They literally referred to TLOU2 in the announcement of their next project and Elly of TLOU2 is features in the playstation banner. So no, they clearly don't want to distance themselves from one of their most successful games ever.
And yet the show is about the first game, and they are remaking the first game and bringing it to PC and PS5, and doing nothing for the PS5 version of TLOU 2.
 
Last edited:

Rykan

Member
And yet the show is about the first game, and they are remaking the first game and bringing it to PC and PS5, and doing nothing for the PS5 version of TLOU 2.
TLOU 2 received an update on PS5. It makes no sense to remake TLOU2 already when TLOU1 will benefit much more from an upgrade. You can get away with a remake of a 9 year old game and charge 70$ for it. Not for a game that came out two years ago and already has PS5 enhancements.
 

Nautilus

Banned
TLOU 2 received an update on PS5. It makes no sense to remake TLOU2 already when TLOU1 will benefit much more from an upgrade. You can get away with a remake of a 9 year old game and charge 70$ for it. Not for a game that came out two years ago and already has PS5 enhancements.
Oh, completely forgot that TLOU 2 had an upgrade for PS5. Just goes to show how much staying power the game had.

But sure, fair enough.
 

yurinka

Member
"The report states that many devs including studio heads were not happy with this arrangement and simply left. Days Gone Directors Jeff Ross And John Garvin have both left Bend Studio in December 2020 and perhaps, Sony's strict decisions are one of the reasons for their departure. "
https://www.altchar.com/game-news/bend-studio-pitched-days-gone-2-but-sony-said-no-aoFKK4G4SHFI#:~:text=The report states that many,the reasons for their departure.
The Days Gone directors debunked that in interviews they did with David Jaffe. One of them left 6 days after releasing Days Gone and the other one left many months later. They said Bend Studio killed Days Gone 2 internally before pitching it to Sony. Sony didn't kill DG2 because they never got that pitch. It was one of the bosses they have inside Bend (the studio manager) who blocked the pitch from being sent to Sony.

The pitch that later Bend sent to Sony was a new IP and it got greenlighted. Both directors only had good words for Sony management, said they always were very supportive with their creative vision, allowed them to do all they wanted and gave them all the support they needed, and were supported even with the mixes reviews they had.

Their reason to leave were more related with disagreeing and having a bad relationship with the boss they both had inside Bend Studio (the studio manager), not with Sony.

They also debunked any bad relationship between Bend and Naughty Dog: both studios helped each other during over a decade when one of the studios needs help because has a ton of work and the other one has some free people.
 
Last edited:

mortal

Gold Member
I don't like fishes.I think they taste funny, weird.Does that mean I have a beef with all the fishes in the world? lol

I think you are confusing not liking something with hating it. I didn't like TLOU 2, and yes I think its a piece of shit, but I dont hate the game or the devs.I wish they do games that cater more to me, not hate them.

I'm not taking it as a slight, I'm just explaining it. You are just taking my replies in a very weird way lol.
Alright, now you're just arguing just to argue...
Having beef is just a slang for not liking something or someone, or taking issue with something or someone. It's not even that deep.

Also, that is a horrible analogy lol. We're discussing a specific title here, and I never accused you of hating all actions games in the world.
You outright assumed I was being unaccepting of your opinions on the game just for simply asking your thoughts on it.
You call it a piece of shit, but then say you don't hate it? I'm sorry, What? You aren't really explaining anything here, you're just argumentative.
You aren't making complete sense tbh, I guess this thread has you feeling defensive or something.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
Druckman said they've been working on the multiplayer for 2 years now.

That means PlayStations two unannounced live service games to be released before March 2023 likely won't be Factions II.
 

Nautilus

Banned
Alright, now you're just arguing just to argue...
Having beef is just a slang for not liking something or someone, or taking issue with something or someone. It's not even that deep.

Also, that is a horrible analogy lol. We're discussing a specific title here, and I never accused you of hating all actions games in the world.
You outright assumed I was being unaccepting of your opinions on the game just for simply asking your thoughts on it.
You call it a piece of shit, but then say you don't hate it? I'm sorry, What? You aren't really explaining anything here, you're just argumentative.
You aren't making complete sense tbh, I guess this thread has you feeling defensive or something.
Ah, now its just a slang lol.

Talk about moving goalposts.

Anyways, you not really questioned anything I said, and wether you agree with what I said or not tgat's up to you, not me. I like what I like, and I dislike what I dislike.

If you hate people just expressing their opinions on an open forum and go all defensive about it, that's your problem, not mine lol.
 
Top Bottom