Lolwut - Hercules was never a failure, it did FANTASTIC at box office back in the day, but it's never been much of a merch spinner. Disney did try a Disney Heroes line to get more of the male market which included the likes of Herc, but it never took off like the Princess line did. The Cars line is the only male demographic line that's really worked out for Disney in the past decade, they make more money off stuff like the princess and faries line. It's only that Hercules isn't as in demand as characters from other features. 91-98 Disney films are the ones people remember fondest, with Pixar and anything from Princess and the Frog onwards being popular also.
The thing is, theres NOTHING about Hercules in the parks right now. Ive read in lots of places, that even if it was not a flop, that disney is ashamed a little bit from the movie now, apart from Hades. In the paris ride "The Art of Animation" theres a section where you watch a fanstatic reel of the most famous disney classics in different eruopean laguages. All the movies, even Pixar ones, have time to shine in the reel. The only one thats not is Hercules, that has the amazing 1 second screen time, im not kidding. Is really 1 second, in a quarter of the screen (its surrounded by Mulan, Lion King and Aladdin, that have also screen time apart).
Its really sad becuase is my favourite disney movie (knowing that there are lots of them that are better, but Hercules is near to my heart)
Black Cauldron *is* an old shame, but its also really hard to market, Hardly anyone outside the 70's and 80's remembers Disney's output from that era all that well. Black Cauldron was a film that suffered a terrible last-minute edit from the then-new management of Eisner and co, who freaked out at how dark the film was. Problem being that people expecting a new darker Disney were left mostly dissapointed, and the usual market stayed away BECAUSE it was apparently dark. There's no memorable chaarcters from it for people to latch onto, even Gurgi - who is so annoying and insufferable in the film, that you don't feel quite so bad about the apparent sacrifice he makes anyway!
Im totally with you here, and it was just sad that Katzenberg get his way and cut the film making it a mess.
On the flip side, Disney has no qualms referencing Fantasia, which WAS a massive flop at Box office. But Sorcerer Mickey makes such good imagery, as does other characters such as Chernabog, that they use them anyway (as you don't really need to see Fantasia to know Sorcerer Mickey is a badass mofo)
I'ld love to see Rescuers and Oliver and co Merch. But I admit that's not going to happen while Disney is all about the synegy : (
History says that fantasia and Pinnochio were flops becuase of World War II (cutting 40% of the european revenue), and they are so important to the history of animation, and now known and love by millions of people, that they are classic really present everyewhere. But as you say, Sorcerer Mickey and Chernabog's imagery really helps.
In all fairness, even Disney feel they overdid Stitch a bit and dialed him down in most parks, but he's still pretty popular with the public. In Paris for some reason him AND Angel from the TV show (even though she's in only a few episodes and direct to DVD movie...) are popular. I can only assume in terms of Europe, it's because the European Disney Channel actually still shows classic shows like Little Mermaid, Aladdin and Stitch.
Stitch is still, little mermaid was taken long ago, and Aladdin was the only one with rerurns until something like 2 years ago (when they based all the program time to Phineas and Ferb or the shitty real action series for girls disney does now) in the european disney channels.
Of course Cars is pretty popular with kids, and of course Stitch seems to be pretty popular also. The sad thing is they are not that good and both franchises are stuffing the parks in an unveliable way. Although you are right, in California Stitch was not so prominent. Paris was just disgusting, I dont understand how the fuck european kids love him so much.
EDIT: Wow, the conversation goes fast, but I have fun talking about this things.
Not only would the R&D time on a game referencing all 50 extensively be INSANE, it will never happen. Also Treasure Planet, Stitch and Meet the Robinsons are pretty awesome films. But only Stitch will stand a chance of being referenced at all methinks (though I can't see Warren being that keen on Stitch anyway). Lilo and Stitch is actually a pretty awesome film if you forget the fact the main character was overadvertised.
Of those 3, only the Penguins from Mary Poppins have a chance, Song will never be referenced for reasons I already outlined. Roger Rabbit is a character Disney cannot use without Ambin okaying it, and the whole Dreamworks thing soured relations between the two ever since. (Which is why Roger Rabbit 2 never happened, even though Disney was keen on doing it)
Nah, it was only my wild wish.
I hated Treasure Planet (and Ive seen it two times), I never liked Lilo and Stitch that much and I never saw Meet The Robinsons, but I heard the majority of people disliked that film.
And its sad that some of Disney history has so many problems to be used. Although I think that the character of Roger, Jessica and Baby Herman are from Walt Disney, but they have problems with the rights of some of the things and thats why the have problems with Amblin with the old sequel (the idea of the old sequel fwas not really good som i dont mind) There have been more serious talks this last years to make a sequel, so lets pray for the best.