• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Fabricated Notch/Mojang party escort allegations; Twitter monsters spring into action

Seanspeed

Banned
To me, it isn't about being a hyper white knight, it's about being considerate and inclusive. I'm not even referring to this Notch situation, which I think was different from the IGDA party.
If you were at a private party that was put on by mostly females, would you really be offended if there attractive males being paid to go around entertaining the women there? C'mon.

This is an example of political correctness going overboard.
 

Kinyou

Member
To be fair, this is "Corporate Party Throwing 101." At Electronica in Munich a few years ago (convention for shit like capacitors, PC boards, green tech, etc), the booth next to mine literally had a naked woman just lying down on a table. I'm not saying that to show you that it is and should be normal, I'm just saying it to express that there might be bigger fish to fry with regards to the "women in ______" outrage. Let's try to get stuff on that level to change before we try to shut down nightclubs for hiring models even though that's not what happened here.

(I know you said there's no outrage on your end and everything, your post just made me remember that anecdote is all)
I kinda agree. I think booth babes are a far bigger factor that might keep women from the industry then some allegedly payed women who were there to dance and socialize.
 
If you were at a private party that was put on by mostly females, would you really be offended if there attractive males being paid to go around entertaining the women there? C'mon.

This is an example of political correctness going overboard.

To take it to an extreme, I guess I could see feeling kind of out of place if I was trying to make actual conversation with attendees, but everyone was more interested in conversing with the people who are paid based on their ability to know how to party and be good looking. From that perspective, I can see why female attendees might theoretically be put off by the reverse. Of course, it's not clear that this is what happened at all. Therefore, I can't really jump on board with any indignation here barring more facts.
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
To take it to an extreme, I guess I could see feeling kind of out of place if I was trying to make actual conversation with attendees, but everyone was more interested in conversing with the people who are paid based on their ability to know how to party and be good looking.

But wouldn't that apply to males as well? Perhaps even moreso?
 
This thread is getting loco.

TuJdx.gif

Is anyone els bothered by the fact that the train track loop switches sides towards the end of the clip?
 
But wouldn't that apply to males as well? Perhaps even moreso?

That they would feel excluded because attendees that they want to talk to are more interested in flirting with the dancers paid to be there? Yeah, that could also be true. But I think in that case, I just feel like the case for justified complaining versus it just being me whining would be harder to make, as I generally don't like being offended for women in as much as I favor empathizing with people who I think might have a legitimate reason to be offended.
 

TheD

The Detective
What i find most baffling is how a lot of people in this thread seem to be completely ignoring the statements by both Notch and the event organiser stating that they didn't hire/ pay people to party at the....party.

That is what happens with witch hunts.
 

Seanspeed

Banned
To take it to an extreme, I guess I could see feeling kind of out of place if I was trying to make actual conversation with attendees, but everyone was more interested in conversing with the people who are paid based on their ability to know how to party and be good looking. From that perspective, I can see why female attendees might theoretically be put off by the reverse. Of course, it's not clear that this is what happened at all. Therefore, I can't really jump on board with any indignation here barring more facts.
The paid women could easily be conversing with the attendee women, too. Its not like there's some specific divide that they have to keep where they're only there to talk to men. I was at a strip club last Thursday night with a few friends and the strippers that would come and talk to us were just as chummy and inclusive with the girl we were with as they were with us guys.
 

RMI

Banned
didn't something happen last year at a Mojang party, where some dude whipped his dick out (unbidden, obviously) towards some chick who complained to the party security and they did nothing?

Not surprising really.
 
The paid women could easily be conversing with the attendee women, too. Its not like there's some specific divide that they have to keep where they're only there to talk to men. I was at a strip club last Thursday night with a few friends and the strippers that would come and talk to us were just as chummy and inclusive with the girl we were with as they were with us guys.

Sure. I was more just taking a devil's advocate stance there in assessing how a similar situation might be uncomfortable as opposed to futilely arguing that this situation was.
 

Amneisac

Member
If you were at a private party that was put on by mostly females, would you really be offended if there attractive males being paid to go around entertaining the women there? C'mon.

This is an example of political correctness going overboard.

Yes? I mean I wouldn't go at all, would you feel wanted, would you go?
 

APF

Member
The paid women could easily be conversing with the attendee women, too. Its not like there's some specific divide that they have to keep where they're only there to talk to men.
But then why only pay for women? If it's just talking it shouldn't matter what gender the models are.

Yes? I mean I wouldn't go at all, would you feel wanted, would you go?
I've worked for / consulted for companies that were predominantly female (Conde Nast, Ann Taylor, some smaller companies in fashion/design). If they threw a party like that (and they don't), it would be creepy as hell. Tech / IT (the only departments that had more than a handful of men) already feel like these weird little enclaves, doing something along these lines would only have ostracized us further.
 

Luminous_Reaver

Neo Member
If you were at a private party that was put on by mostly females, would you really be offended if there attractive males being paid to go around entertaining the women there? C'mon.

I would wonder why they needed to be paid.

You guys are right, this is grossly sexist. Those women shouldn't have been paid anything considering they were corralled to go to a free party.
 
Welp, here goes:

This way of making money is not intellectually stimulating for a person. These women could be getting a degree/making a real career out of their lives; instead they have given in to society's vision of them in order to pay the bills. It makes that person come off as slutty and stupid, and that something as artificial as money can pay for her attention. It perpetuates stereotypes about an entire gender of people that have historically been mistreated by men. It makes women who aren't there to make money feel uncomfortable, and creates a hostile environment towards women in the games/tech industry. I'm against the notion of people being paid for their sexual attractiveness, yes.

Well, are you equal opportunist?

I can't really agree with deciding what jobs are "worthwhile" or not. Being paid to stand around and talk, and dance a bit, has nothing on other jobs where there is actually a physical/mental downside - such as heavy labour or prostitution.
 
This thread is incredible!

So a guy throws his own party, with his own atmosphere etc. and supposedly somebody else hired models there. They implanted atmosphere models at his party!?

Misguided said:
  1. This way of making money is not intellectually stimulating for a person.
  2. These women could be getting a degree/making a real career out of their lives; instead they have given in to society's vision of them in order to pay the bills.
  3. It makes that person come off as slutty and stupid, and that something as artificial as money can pay for her attention.
  4. I'm against the notion of people being paid for their sexual attractiveness, yes.

1. What a condescending and generic thing to say. There is no way that you can prove this is true. Is this revealing your preconception that you think these women are stupid? Nobody will take that argument seriously.

2. Wrong. You vilify society's vision while you state your own vision for them: getting a degree, "real" career. Sanctimonious and pontificating in the same sentence. Show some respect to these women.

3. Very interesting choice of words here. Just who thinks they are slutty/stupid, hmmm?

4. So would it be okay if it weren't sexual?
 
I would wonder why they needed to be paid.

You guys are right, this is grossly sexist. Those women shouldn't have been paid anything considering they were corralled to go to a free party.

I'm not sure if you're being serious, but I think it is worth noting that there can be real skill here on display in more ways than simply being good looking. Being able to mingle and make interesting conversation and dance well and be flirtatious and not just sticking with particular people or groups probably isn't something to sneeze at. Just bringing in attractive people that like to party off the street may not yield the results that the organizers are going for.
 

Espada

Member
Doesn't sound like much of a problem. I've heard of attractive people being hired to other venues (private or otherwise) in other industries as well. These women are being paid for their time and this nothing more than a job. They're not strippers or anything of the sort.
 

Seanspeed

Banned
Yes? I mean I wouldn't go at all, would you feel wanted, would you go?
Its a party full of women. You'd have to have some pretty bad insecurity issues not to go. Its not like we're talking Chip'n'Dale dancers or anything.

But then why only pay for women? If it's just talking it shouldn't matter what gender the models are.
Because its a predominantly male audience? Catering to the crowd, as they say.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
Hmmm. Stories aren't adding up. Very conflicting info going around Twitter. Some very specific claims being made by people, vs very explicit denials.
 

Seanspeed

Banned
How is that catering to the crowd? I thought it was just talking? Are you saying men are incapable of speaking to other men?
Who said it was 'just talking'? Yes, thats all that they are required to do, but their attractive presence is also part of the desired effect. Are you a guy? Do you like interacting with attractive women?
 

qko

Member
Were there absolutely no women on the guest list and if there were was there some way that was differentiating the escorts and the guests?

Thing I always find dangerous about these "lets hire a bunch of escorts" kinds of parties is the sleazy groupthink that sometimes leads to stuff like the Stubenville case or that one Lacrosse rape case.
 
Game hobbyists are currently in their university stage of life, trying to get outraged every chance they get about issues that don't effect them.
 

Kinyou

Member
What would make me a little uncomfortable is to find out that the cute girl I was dancing with all night long was paid $300/hr to endure my presence.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
What's being claimed? I haven't seen anything.

Well, Terry Kavanagh seemed very sure about it, but maybe he was relating second hand info.

Nick Robinson says after the party he stumbled into a room backstage with about 20 women waiting to leave. He initially said 'women paid to be there'. He later said he wasn't sure if they worked for the venue or had been brought in, but that he believes they were the women mingling in the VIP area.

Another twitterer seems to suggest women were being sneaked into the VIP area.
 

Dysun

Member
Game hobbyists are currently in their university stage of life, trying to get outraged every chance they get about issues that don't effect them.

The PC White Knights are on a holy crusade against our kind of filth

If I showed up to a party with hired dancers my reaction wouldn't be outrage, I'll tell you that
 
Who said it was 'just talking'? Yes, thats all that they are required to do, but their attractive presence is also part of the desired effect. Are you a guy? Do you like interacting with attractive women?

I know this is more of a rhetorical question. But personally, I'm not really a fan in theory of what I feel to be a forced interaction. I feel the same way about celebrity interaction in that it's hard for me to shake my innate cynicism and feeling bad for them that they are basically forced to pretend to want to talk to me.

Having said that, though, I would be lying if I acted as though I've never had an absolutely pleasant conversation with an attractive waitress or bartender, so I'm not condemning the efficacy of what they do or why attractive, personable people are hired.
 

RotBot

Member
Who said it was 'just talking'? Yes, thats all that they are required to do, but their attractive presence is also part of the desired effect. Are you a guy? Do you like interacting with attractive women?

If I was a game developer going to Notch's GDC party, I would expect to go there to unwind and talk shop with like-minded compatriots. I would find the presence of women with no clue about game development paid to talk and flirt with me strange and slightly off-putting. Maybe I'm in the minority on this, given how popular booth babes still are in this day and age.
 

APF

Member
Who said it was 'just talking'? Yes, thats all that they are required to do, but their attractive presence is also part of the desired effect.
What is that desired effect?


Are you a guy? Do you like interacting with attractive women?
Not for the sake of it. I talk to attractive women all the time, so it depends on what they're saying / what we're talking about. If I were in an industry event or a corporate party I would find it tedious to be surrounded by people who didn't belong there except as eye (ear?) candy. Although I'm not so insecure about myself or my sexuality that I need people to be forced to hang around me.


Edit: a private party is a different matter however; I was directly speaking about corporations / businesses throwing parties for their employees.
 
lol @ this. i live in new orleans, and all of the girls i knew in college were shotgirls at least once in their life because you make an absurd amount of money in like 3 hours of work. no, they weren't abused by their parents, or beaten, or did massive amounts of drugs......they just took advantage of the oppurtunity. but clearly, GAF and these idiots on twitter should throw a fucking fit and yell at them and the people who bought shots from them.
 
Top Bottom