• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

#PS4NoDRM #XboxOneNoDRM || Now do you "Believe?"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Toma

Let me show you through these halls, my friend, where treasures of indie gaming await...
lol so MS talk about this and everyone hates them and bashes them, rumours of Sony doing similar though causes uproar and a campaign to "Save" the PS4?

As mentioned multiple times, it is way more likely for Sony to change anything atm, while MS semi-confirmed these issues at one point. People are not letting go of Sony, and if Sony decides to jump the DRM/UsedGameNoSale ship, they'll be attacked too from the same people that voice their hope now.
 
I've done my part. Been buying PlayStation consoles and games for 15 years. No DRM Sony. Used games are what brought me into the PlayStation family
 

open_mouth_

insert_foot_
If enough gamers vote with their wallets, I am 100% sure that DRM can be toppled before or even after the launch of the consoles. It's just "switch" and any agreements in place can be settled for the greater good I'm sure.

Our biggest fear should be if adoption rates of DRM consoles/games is acceptable after launch just like what happened with DLC...
 

sTeLioSco

Banned
lol so MS talk about this and everyone hates them and bashes them, rumours of Sony doing similar though causes uproar and a campaign to "Save" the PS4?

ms got some feedback through Adam Orth situation also but didn't care.

lets see the final decisions of sony. but already its good that no internet is required............
 

Corto

Member
I understand why people want them, but at the same time I don't hear people bitch about it with PCs.

PC has them for a long time now. Historically that's a given in that platform and they were implemented in a time when piracy was rampant and the platform as a viable gaming platform was struggling. Its openness though makes up for it as there are viable no-DRM options that the user can chose from and retail prices of the games are lower on average compared to their console counterparts and there are frequent aggressive sales on several different outlets. A closed console environment with such intrusive and limited DRM will leave the user with no options, besides implicitly accept them and limit their options.
 

JimmyRustler

Gold Member
If enough gamers vote with their wallets, I am 100% sure that DRM can be toppled before or even after the launch of the consoles. It's just "switch" and any agreements in place can be settled for the greater good I'm sure.

Our biggest fear should be if adoption rates of DRM consoles/games is acceptable after launch just like what happened with DLC...
After Diablo 3 and Sim City you really think that enough gamers will vote with their wallets? See kinda out of place.
 
Yup, and that's why. They shouldn't speak about something they can't if it costs them their jobs. This is about letting us, the consumers, voice our thoughts and feelings on this.

It's better than doing nothing and hopefully at E3, we'll hear the answers we want. Hopefully. #BELIEVE

Yeah, this is the best that we can do for now. They need to be bombarded from now until E3 with PS4noDRM. Make it clear that this isn't just some one day issue that's then forgotten. Right now they're seeing this and all the extremely negative articles being directed at MS due to their rumored stance on this issue. That should make it crystal clear how gamers feel about this issue.
 
The bias is shielding your mind from common sense.

I have no bias towards either, I just found it funny. Just because Sony hasn't said it outright doesn't mean they didn't have similar stuff in place already.
A campaign like this could easily be done for MS too to make them change their minds also.
But all this sounds a bit too naive
 

artist

Banned
capture0ru9g.png


:)
 

JimmyRustler

Gold Member
PC has them for a long time now. Historically that's a given in that platform and they were implemented in a time when piracy was rampant and the platform as a viable gaming platform was struggling. Its openness though makes up for it as there are viable no-DRM options that the user can chose from and retail prices of the games are lower on average compared to their console counterparts and there are frequent aggressive sales on several different outlets. A closed console environment with such intrusive and limited DRM will leave the use without no options, besides implicitly accept them and limit their options.
What is interesting though is that people fail to mention how irrelevant used games are on PC. Have you ever tried to sell used PC game? I did once try to sell a big pile of my collection. Never again. Makes more sense to just throw them into the garbage.
 

artist

Banned
I have no bias towards either, I just found it funny. Just because Sony hasn't said it outright doesn't mean they didn't have similar stuff in place already.
A campaign like this could easily be done for MS too to make them change their minds also.
But all this sounds a bit too naive
Have you even read the OP? Just one minute and it'll be clear to you. Nothing naive about it.
 

scakko84

Member
After Diablo 3 and Sim City you really think that enough gamers will vote with their wallets? See kinda out of place.

This.

Most of the people will first buy it anyway and then (probably, not so sure) complain/be annoyed.

Just buying it is like saying that you agree and think this DRM stuff is legit and should be supported.
 

sTeLioSco

Banned
After Diablo 3 and Sim City you really think that enough gamers will vote with their wallets? See kinda out of place.

simcity was organized and had effect.

after the initial sales due to brand name the sales tanked.

But the important thing is that EA was quick to say that the next Sims wont require always online! so i think if its organized you can make a difference....

as for diablo,well those that paid for it are still in blizzards forums crying crying everytime a hack happens. so its their problem :)
 
lol so MS talk about this and everyone hates them and bashes them, rumours of Sony doing similar though causes uproar and a campaign to "Save" the PS4?

Nothing to do with that. Since Sony have basically nothing announced for PS4 in regard to used games and DRM there is nothing for them to u-turn on. They can come out on 6/10/13 and say "we've listened to gamers around the world, and ensured that there are no restrictions placed on used games for PS4 and there is no mandatory online check-in" while MS would have some serious back peddling to do. It's much easier for Sony to make this happen than MS.

Also, Sony are much less remote than MS in the last few years. They seem to engage with consumers and fans much more than MS, I think that is because of Yoshida and Andrew House. Without Allard, Xbox is just another faceless MS division and it shows, consumer interaction is minimal.

After Diablo 3 and Sim City you really think that enough gamers will vote with their wallets? See kinda out of place.

SimCity shipped 1.2m copies in the first week (physical and digital) and then in the ensuing months it had increased by just 400k to 1.6m, gamers did vote with their wallets and SimCity will be the least successful of the franchise.

Now that may kill it completely, but if that's the price of not putting up with shitty practices then so be it.
 
Sony is in a dilemma, if they cave Publishers will bail, if they go the DRM route they stand to lose "x" amount of gamers.

If they have entered into an agreement with publishers via a contract to support DRM with splitting fees, its a done deal and they might as well get out in front of this story and say we are the bearer of bad news.

If DRM is the new normal, well digital copies of games should be significantly less, since the publisher doesn't have to pay for delivery and brick and mortar. Whatever the cost that is associated with getting games to retailers that cost should be considered for the digital copy. So if the retail cost is $60.00 bucks the digital copy should be $40.00.
 
Nothing to do with that. Since Sony have basically nothing announced for PS4 in regard to used games and DRM there is nothing for them to u-turn on. They can come out on 6/10/13 and say "we've listened to gamers around the world, and ensured that there are no restrictions placed on used games for PS4 and there is no mandatory online check-in" while MS would have some serious back peddling to do. It's much easier for Sony to make this happen than MS.

Also, Sony are much less remote than MS in the last few years. They seem to engage with consumers and fans much more than MS, I think that is because of Yoshida and Andrew House. Without Allard, Xbox is just another faceless MS division and it shows, consumer interaction is minimal.

If people care so much about no used games DRM etc then they should be attacking everywhere on twitter got to do with gaming. Not just trying to save Sony. Similar tweets should be sent out to publishers, MS and anyone who has sway in the industry.
It won't be enough just to save Sony's ass in the matter. It's a start but I highly doubt they will change it completely and leave MS with their DRM in place. It causes a divide among devs and publishers
 

Stuart444

Member
Sony is in a dilemma, if they cave Publishers will bail, if they go the DRM route they stand to lose "x" amount of gamers.

If they have entered into an agreement with publishers via a contract to support DRM with splitting fees, its a done deal and they might as well get out in front of this story and say we are the bearer of bad news.

If DRM is the new normal, well digital copies of games should be significantly less, since the publisher doesn't have to pay for delivery and brick and mortar. Whatever the cost that is associated with getting games to retailers that cost should be considered for the digital copy. So if the retail cost is $60.00 bucks the digital copy should be $40.00.

Publishers won't bail, at worst they will give exclusives to XBone. If people go to the PS4 because of their status (no used games DRM) then Pubs will go to the PS4.

Why? Because Publishers like money. Simple as that, they won't abandon a platform because of this as it would means a LOT of loss revenue.
 
Sony is in a dilemma, if they cave Publishers will bail, if they go the DRM route they stand to lose "x" amount of gamers.

If they have entered into an agreement with publishers via a contract to support DRM with splitting fees, its a done deal and they might as well get out in front of this story and say we are the bearer of bad news.

If DRM is the new normal, well digital copies of games should be significantly less, since the publisher doesn't have to pay for delivery and brick and mortar. Whatever the cost that is associated with getting games to retailers that cost should be considered for the digital copy. So if the retail cost is $60.00 bucks the digital copy should be $40.00.

No they won't. That's HALF of their potential sales revenue lost right out of the gate, no questions asked.
 

Invictus

Banned
Great to see the articles and tweets. This may not change anything, but better to try than to sit back and let it happen. After today, Sony can never say they didn't hear us, only that they didn't listen.
 
I am getting a PS4, but my concern about this DRM is that 3rd party publishers will go to MS is they do not allow used games. That's what I am afraid of.
 
No they won't. That's HALF of their potential sales revenue lost right out of the gate, no questions asked.

Publishers will go where the best cost per mile is. And if blocking used games on the Xbone means more first hand sales then they will likely go there.
Sure that might not happen, but there is no point trying to save Sony in all of this without similarly trying to change MS mind too

I am getting a PS4, but my concern about this DRM is that 3rd party publishers will go to MS is they do not allow used games. That's what I am afraid of.

Exactly why we should be tweeting MS and publishers too, not JUST Sony
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom