• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

How many sexual partners for girls is too many?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Artanisix

Member
Why's it matter? I mean, as long as you've established that you're looking for a monogamous relationship, and she hasn't banged anyone else during your dating, who cares what she's done in the past.

Hell I've only slept with three different women, but I wouldn't care if my current girlfriend had a ton of dudes before me. Although that'd be kinda weird since we've been dating for five years now and she's only 22.
 

Rational

Banned
Most vaginas are combination locks and that guy is just salty he fails at getting it right.
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.
 
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use time, effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.

If you want to take a joke that seriously.
 
I guess this could work as the right number. It looks more rational than some stuff I've seen a few pages back.

pn6Oh7vl.jpg


Edit: and by "rational", I mean rational, not Rational.
 
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use time, effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.
What the fuck. Stop taking out your insecurities on others.
 

Anastasia

Member
How the hell is this even a question. Women can fuck or not fuck as many people as they want. Same for anyone of any other gender. It doesn't indicate anything about their personality, intelligence, self-esteem, etc. Jesus christ. Sex is fun, sex is good, people like sex. Stop shaming people for having sex.

And honestly this thread is inherently misogynistic and should have been locked from the start.

Thank you. This post is a beacon of light in what is otherwise a dark, vapid tunnel.
 
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.

Cot damn man...

This thread is like a quicksand pit for the dull
 
Okay, wait, actually women are like manual cars, you don't shift right, we don't get revved. Or something. Driving! Yeah.

Edit: I love how an orgasm joke turned into 'So you have to use money to get girls, which is bs.' What.
 

Batigol

Banned
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.

Is this a serious post?
 

Pau

Member
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.
What if I put time, effort, and money into pursuing guys who are good at combination locks. Does that mean they have their own locks? Am I a key or lockpick too? :O

Edit: Wait we've moved to cars already?
 
What if I put time, effort, and money into pursuing guys who are good at combination locks. Does that mean they have their own locks? Am I a key or lockpick too? :O

Edit: Wait we've moved to cars already?

This metaphor is getting confusing, I agree.
 

Viewt

Member
Cubes, cars, lockpicks? Look, I have standards. If a girl uses more than two mixed metaphors, I gotta throw her on the street. I have integrity, dammit.
 

CHEEZMO™

Obsidian fan
So you agree womens' vaginas are combination locks that men have to 'get right' (aka use effort, and money) to get the woman to unlock for them (unlock means having sex, the woman has all the say in whether to have sex or not). So you therefore agree that's the way it is in society as well, men have to do all the work in getting laid, and it is the woman's choice whether they have sex, hence why the analogy is effective and accurate.

What's your boggle?
 

Fonz72

Member
Good friend Can winging them bungalows of logic. You go sir.

Yeah, he sure showed me. Falling back on saying I'm insecure repeatedly and that I have poor reading comprehenison. All the while, ignoring the fact that his explanation of what he posted was totally different than the comment he originally made. Golf clap.................

Point stands, not pursuing girls you don't find attractive or interesting does not lower your maturity. But if all your in to is the number of people you've slept with then I suppose you should "expand your horizons" by not limiting yourself to girls you find interesting or attractive.

But I guess I wouldn't know about that being so insecure and all......................
 

Brobzoid

how do I slip unnoticed out of a gloryhole booth?
Any woman who doesn't self-identify as a steampunk lock with elaborate, exposed gears can KEEP ON WALKING

I don't tip my rustic-brimmed hat at just anyone
 
Eh. Plenty of people settle down with someone who's had way more sex than they have.

That's cool too. Point is that's up to the individual. If someone values a lack of sexual partners and holds themselves to the same standards, then it's not hypocritical to feel this way is all I'm saying.

I basically just don't like hypocrites.

I personally wouldn't care if my wife had been with more men than I had slept with women.
 
Guys, guys, I got this:

Vaginas are pedestals, cocks are trophies.
If you try to put too many trophies on a pedestal, they won't fit and the pedestal will function inadequately as a trophy holder.
 

Pau

Member
Cubes, cars, lockpicks? Look, I have standards. If a girl uses more than two mixed metaphors, I gotta throw her on the street. I have integrity, dammit.
This I can get behind. The metaphors are getting out of hand. (But they are making the thread so much more worth it now.)
 

Reeks

Member
The world would be so much better if open relationships were more common, if attitudes toward sex for the purpose of pleasure were more relaxed. Greed and insecurity and pride will prevent it from ever becoming more than a niche lifestyle, however. It's a shame.

If you're wanting a monogamous relationship, it doesn't matter how much sex anyone has had before agreeing to monogamy, only who they have it with after that. If it's a concern,it's a concern because of your own faults, not the other person's, and I would think they'd be better off without you anyway.

preach!
 
This thread needs a bunker buster dropped right on top of it. Really sad that people have such hang ups when it comes to their potential partner's past. I guess most would rather dwell on the past, than be in the moment with someone that cares for them.

:|
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom