• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Another failed console spec comparison (Gamespot)

Yoday

Member
This can't be real...right? Okay, it looks like they edited a bunch of their mistakes already. Though not specifying the GPU is a huge disservice to readers. Also, they are still listing the "7 core IBM Cell" as a 3 core CPU, lol.

EDIT: Their updated comparison

2382343-comparison_final.jpg
 

B.O.O.M

Member
Hopefully gamespot users call them out on this bs. I swear these past few days some of these outlets have been out right embarassing
 
Xbox superiority confirmed!

If they put CPU frequency, why don't they put GPU power? It's confusing as hell just putting the brand name (is RSX just a code name?) for GPUs?

Especially when considering that we never received official Sony confirmation on the PS4 CPU clock speed, while the GPU clocks and Tflops are confirmed by MS and Sony. Wow.
 

VanWinkle

Member
-We don't know the clock speed of the PS4's CPU
-Doesn't show any GPU information, a huge point of distinction
-GDDR3 is not a thing that exists
-The 360 has a optical drive with DVDs, it says it has no optical drive
-"# of Cores" is confusing, as it's listed under the RAM rather than the CPU area, and just says "cores". What kind of cores?
-PS4 doesn't have video chat, and even if it did it would be HD, because the camera is
-Xbox One does not have bluetooth
-PS3 supports 7 controllers, not 4.
 

Hexa

Member
List of things wrong:

PS4 CPU Clock still isn't confirmed right? Rumors of 1.8?
Only mentions brand name on GPU for Xbone/PS4. Makes sure to label 360 differently even though it would be basically the same thing.
GDDR3 RAM for Xbone lol
Since when does the Cell in PS3 have 3 cores? 1 core with 6 SPEs that aren't really cores. Where the hell did 3 come from? Meaningless comparison anyway.
360 without optical drive? What? Not sure if there is one coming out without it, but if they're mentioning all the hard drive size saying the 360 doesn't have optical drive doesn't make any sense.
PS4 chat box makes no sense.
360 blue-tooth?
PS3 can support 7 controllers.

Edit: God damn. Beaten. Mostly.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
I generally don't like to call pieces of games journalism biased because it's usually a cop out for potentially legitimate reasons for the misinformation..

but this looks biased as fuck. Like, it was designed to be selectively ignorant of certain details. No way that such a major gaming media outlet could have put this out like that or have had their head that deep in the sand.
 

Darksol

Member
My technical knowledge is slightly above that of a chimp and even I could see the glaring issues in this comparison.
 
This is just embarrassing. I mean, you could open up Wikipedia for each of these consoles and get this info slapped onto an infographic in under 30 minutes. How did they fuck this up so much?
 

Boss Man

Member
Oh so they updated with rumored CPU specs but the GPUs are shown as being the same, cool and totally not done on purpose.
 

Queeg

Member
Yet another hachet job being preformed here for Microsoft. They're happy to give their readers the benifit of doubt that they understand what the amount of CPU cores and the CPU speed do, while it favours MS. But they don't give them the more important ones of the GPU while they go the other way.
 

ymmv

Banned
Are us game sites really this clueless or was this done on purpose? Really every single comparison downplays bothe the ps4's greater power and lower price.
 

GodofWine

Member
Media is SHOCKINGLY apologetic towards xb1.

Seriously, If these two boxes were just PC builds, theyd all say how much better the PC with the faster ram and far stronger gpu is, along with all its other untapped as of yet processing abilities.
 

Kibbles

Member
All my 360s have had optical audio output not sure why that's N/A on the chart. Hell I use it for my Astros.
 
Going by that article it should be pretty easy to land a job at gamespot. This is from one of the largest gaming sites on the net.
 
Yeah, thinking about this some more.. this really pisses me off. People are going to be spending 400-500 dollars on these machines.. they deserve to know what's up.
 

alr1ght

bish gets all the credit :)
The incompetence of the first comparison chart leads me to believe that they have no idea what they're talking about, not about downplaying the difference. Either way, there's lots of smart people at gamespot that could have easily checked this before going to print.
 
if the PS4 doesn't support Wi-Fi direct, I'd love to know how my Vita connects directly to it, because it sure as shit isn't using Bluetooth.

I don't see what the benefit of Wi-Fi direct is on the Xbox One other than smartglass support without needing to go through a router, which the PS4 matches in features, even if not with the Wi-Fi direct branding.
 

Beant

Member
Yeah, thinking about this some more.. this really pisses me off. People are going to be spending 400-500 dollars on these machines.. they deserve to know what's up.

And someone got paid to do this. I reckon many many many gaffers could make a more accurate one.
 

UberTag

Member
Plus if i was average joe looking at that list i would think the bone was more powerful.
That's the point.

After all, the Xbox One has a faster CPU, the same amount of GDDR RAM with a little number that's different at the end, it has HDMI in, it has Snap, it has Skype, it has HD Video Chat, it has WI-FI Direct connectivity, it supports 8 controllers, it has Kinect, it has TitanFall... AND all of this for only $100 more?!?!?

OMG, I must go and line up outside of Wal-Mart right now. Fill the cooler in the pick-up with beer, Ma! I'm gonna get me a new-fangled gaming machine to play prettier-lookin' Call of Duty.

Does no one fact check anymore?
Fact checking is a relic of print publishing. Why the hell would someone waste resources on that?
Now you can put out whatever you like and when someone calls you on its inaccuracies you can just label them an overzealous fanboy and hug it out on Twitter with your "journalist" buddies.
 
Sigh. Such a comparison isn't much worth without stating how powerful those GPUs are. It shouldn't be that hard to add something like this:

Xbox One GPU:

AMD Radeon with 1.31 TFLOPS (~1.18 usable for games, rest for Kinect)

PS4 GPU:

AMD Radeon with 1.84 TFLOPS (all usable for games)
 
I guess it was important to be specific about the CPU clock and nothing else. And the number of cores on Cell too....on the name at least. Or not because it has 8 and not 7 and shit... maybe 3... jesus this list.
 

kaiyo

Member
For the non tech savvy among us, care to explain why this is a failed comparison?

Edit:

Okay, I noticed that the GPU specifics are missing and does the XB One Support bluetooth?

1) CPU - PS3 does not have 7 core, nor does it have 3 cores.

2) RAM- Xbone should be DDR3

3) Storage space - they are counting from launch to now? since they have ps3 as 20gb [one of the launch sku] -500gb (which should be 12gb that released recently) - which means that the 360 should be from 0 - 320gb since there was a launch sku with no hdd. Same with wifi; 360 launch skus don't have wifi.

4) Optical Drive - 360 has DVD

5) Pretty sure PS4 has HD video chat. 360 should have cross game chat listed

6) PS3 supports up to 8 Controllers (7 via bluetooth)

7) badly organized
 

Brannon

Member
Those bloody anal beads...

If it were not so late, I'd make a correct counter-list. It would be in paint, and the consoles would be hand drawn, but at least it wouldn't be black on freakin' black.

EDIT: Crap, meant to put my lament for editing in here instead of making a new post... you know what, I'm going to stop because I refuse to get all fractal with this.
 

onQ123

Member
It's to the point where I think they are just trolling SMH.


if not whoever did it is just an idiot & I hope they read this

1287666826226.png


I can troll too lol.
 
Top Bottom