MR ARCADE FOREVER
Member
Of course at Resetera they would claimed al these bs and more
It would be allowed if she looked like this:
That tràiler was beautiful.
It's a shame how dissapointing the game looks right now.
Game looks pretty good, and everyone who's played it either gushed about it, or had mostly positive things to say. I would say it has more to do with your expectations, which I don't mean as slight against you. The game's been in development for 7 years. That's a lot of time to picture in your head what the game should look like. I had a very different idea in my head 7 years ago what this game would have looked like. I pictured it as a groundbreaking, next-gen spiritual successor to Mass Effect, except in the cyberpunk universe, with Blade Runner paint.
Ultimately though, I'm happy with what I'm seeing.
Weak? If I remember correctly, she took a bullet to her face and has arm claws...I think the ones shooting need saving.I was watching this trailer recently and it dawned on me that something like this would not be "acceptable" in today's environment. Or am I wrong? I thought this was a particularly interesting example because we haven't had many games that have been in development for long enough to have crossed the pre/post SJW movement. A few possible thoughts of contention:
1) Here you have a beautiful woman - does this objectify women?
2) She's on her knees - really? A woman can only be portrayed as weak?
3) The blood might be interpreted as a "damsel in distress", she's hurt and needs saving.
4) Her augmentations; a woman can't be "complete" without "man kind's" interference.
5) God only knows what other insanity you could infer from this trailer.
Thoughts? Could this trailer be released in 2020 without facing a shitstorm?
Her face, or part of it, is probably detachable (like seen in the 2nd 2077 trailer) so not really an issue and easily replaced.Weak? If I remember correctly, she took a bullet to her face and has arm claws...I think the ones shooting need saving.
Yeah it has got character creation.I might be wrong here, but Cyberpunk 2077 has character creation, dose it not? If it does you can simply make the character to look however you want, why does it matter how default character looks like?
Interesting take I think it would gander heat from a certain sub set of people I think when ever R* shows off GTA we could make a comparison.I was watching this trailer recently and it dawned on me that something like this would not be "acceptable" in today's environment. Or am I wrong? I thought this was a particularly interesting example because we haven't had many games that have been in development for long enough to have crossed the pre/post SJW movement. A few possible thoughts of contention:
1) Here you have a beautiful woman - does this objectify women?
2) She's on her knees - really? A woman can only be portrayed as weak?
3) The blood might be interpreted as a "damsel in distress", she's hurt and needs saving.
4) Her augmentations; a woman can't be "complete" without "man kind's" interference.
5) God only knows what other insanity you could infer from this trailer.
Thoughts? Could this trailer be released in 2020 without facing a shitstorm?
While I believe that your intentions for this thread are of a sinister nature I don't want to ignore it, and say this: You don't have to find the middle ground for yourself. There is 'good' stuff you could not give a shit about, and 'bad' stuff you will recognize as being fun decades on. No inner turmoil needed.Agreed, I'm definitely guilty as being as bad as them sometimes. Ping ponging between extremes is the best way to find the middle ground IMO. I hate finding myself on either ends of the extreme left and right. And forcing myself to see both perspectives is healthy IMO. I force myself to watch alt right and alt left videos on youtube for example. It's painful but very useful.
I wasn’t even that interested in this game, but the more we approach the launch, the more they announce features that were supposed to exist that will not exist anymore, the more crappy gameplay is shown (the katana gameplay is just horrid) and the hype has just dissapeared.
And those who like to do gas-lighting!Looking back at past stuff and finding “issues” is something idiots do.
Neither Deus Ex nor Bloodlines, which were inspirations for this game, had satisfying combat. And arguably none of CDPR's previous games had great combat either. Yet these games are considered classics. The people who played Cyberpunk 2077, considered the combat decent, but not amazing, and raved about the world building, characterisation, and responsiveness to player choice. These are the reasons to be hyped about the game IMO, and expecting Forza + CoD + Mount & Blade is only going to lead to disappointment.I wasn’t even that interested in this game, but the more we approach the launch, the more they announce features that were supposed to exist that will not exist anymore, the more crappy gameplay is shown (the katana gameplay is just horrid) and the hype has just dissapeared.
You are thinking too hard. Don’t kick up controversy when there isn’t any.
Looking back at past stuff and finding “issues” is something idiots do.
Underrated post.If you enjoyed this thread, you can also play it on Xbox 360, Xbox One & Steam!
I've also never played Halo Reach and have no real opinion on it. Not trying to start a console war here.