IFireflyl
Gold Member
If Asus want to launch a product today and ask money for it then it's their duty to ensure its ready, works as it should and is worth the money they are asking for it. If someone thinks that's the case as it is today and the value proposition is correct for them then fine. It's not however your duty as a consumer excuse them, justify what they are doing, test it for them and help them make it worth it (if the situation is that it's not ready to go to market and it's not worth it vs the other options out there). If they expect that of you then you should be getting paid, not the other way round.
Mini-rant over but it's important that people realise products improve by us demanding more, not making excuses for them. In an ideal world the ROG ally launches and it's better than the Steam Deck from a usability standpoint, that way Valve are also pushed to improve and adopt any innovations that Asus might have come up with where applicable. But right now as it stands, it's just the raw hardware that is better, something that valve can easily remedy through releasing a steam deck with updated internals, it's not pushing them in any other way. Internally they will view this the same as any other newly released windows based handheld PC out there.
I get what you're saying, but you're giving Valve a pass whereas you're holding ASUS's feet to the fire. The Steam Deck had launch issues for a product they sold. They worked on the launch issues and made great improvements. Every post you have made about the Steam Deck has been in defense of it. Why doesn't ASUS get the same benefit of the doubt that you gave Valve? It's ASUS' first foray into the handheld PC market (unless someone wants to be pedantic and argue that the ROG phones are technically a handheld PC). You don't need to try to tear them a new one when the device hasn't even launched yet.