• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • Hey Guest. Check out the NeoGAF 2.2 Update Thread for details on our new Giphy integration and other new features.

Opinion [Atlantic] QAnon Is Destroying the GOP From Within - Op-Ed by Ben Sasse

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
Sep 5, 2014
7,237
8,986
1,125
USA

"Until last week, too many in the Republican Party thought they could preach the Constitution and wink at QAnon. They can’t."​



This is a long one, but a very worthwhile read.
Eugene goodman is an American hero. At a pivotal moment on January 6, the veteran United States Capitol Police officer single-handedly prevented untold bloodshed. Staring down an angry, advancing mob, he retreated up a marble staircase, calmly wielding his baton to delay his pursuers while calling out their position to his fellow officers. At the top of the steps, still alone and standing just a few yards from the chamber where senators and Vice President Mike Pence had been certifying the Electoral College’s vote, Goodman strategically lured dozens of the mayhem-minded away from an unguarded door to the Senate floor.

The leader of that flank of the mob, later identified by the FBI as Douglas Jensen, wore a T-shirt emblazoned with a red-white-and-blue Q—the insignia of the delusional QAnon conspiracy theory. Its supporters believe that a righteous Donald Trump is leading them in a historic quest to expose the U.S. government’s capture by a global network of cannibalistic pedophiles: not just “deep state” actors in the intelligence community, but Chief Justice John Roberts and a dozen-plus senators, including me. Now Trump’s own vice president is supposedly in on it, too. According to the FBI, Jensen “wanted to have his T-shirt seen on video so that ‘Q’ could ‘get the credit.’”

January 6 is a new red-letter day in U.S. history, not just because it was the first time that the Capitol had been ransacked since the War of 1812, but because a subset of the invaders apparently were attempting to disrupt a constitutionally mandated meeting of Congress, kidnap the vice president, and somehow force him to declare Trump the victor in an election he lost. En route, the mob ultimately injured scores of law-enforcement officers. The attack led to the deaths of two officers and four other Americans. But the toll could have been much worse: Police located pipe bombs at the headquarters of both the Republican and Democratic National Committees. Investigators discovered a vehicle fully loaded with weaponry and what prosecutors are calling “homemade napalm bombs.”

The violence that Americans witnessed—and that might recur in the coming days—is not a protest gone awry or the work of “a few bad apples.” It is the blossoming of a rotten seed that took root in the Republican Party some time ago and has been nourished by treachery, poor political judgment, and cowardice. When Trump leaves office, my party faces a choice: We can dedicate ourselves to defending the Constitution and perpetuating our best American institutions and traditions, or we can be a party of conspiracy theories, cable-news fantasies, and the ruin that comes with them. We can be the party of Eisenhower, or the party of the conspiracist Alex Jones. We can applaud Officer Goodman or side with the mob he outwitted. We cannot do both.

If and when the House sends its article of impeachment against Trump to the Senate, I will be a juror in his trial, and thus what I can say in advance is limited. But no matter what happens in that trial, the Republican Party faces a separate reckoning. Until last week, many party leaders and consultants thought they could preach the Constitution while winking at QAnon. They can’t. The GOP must reject conspiracy theories or be consumed by them. Now is the time to decide what this party is about.

The newly elected Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene is cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. She once ranted that “there’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to take this global cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles out, and I think we have the president to do it.” During her campaign, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy had a choice: disavow her campaign and potentially lose a Republican seat, or welcome her into his caucus and try to keep a lid on her ludicrous ideas. McCarthy failed the leadership test and sat on the sidelines. Now in Congress, Greene isn’t going to just back McCarthy as leader and stay quiet. She’s already announced plans to try to impeach Joe Biden on his first full day as president. She’ll keep making fools out of herself, her constituents, and the Republican Party.

If the GOP is to have a future outside the fever dreams of internet trolls, we have to call out falsehoods and conspiracy theories unequivocally. We have to repudiate people who peddle those lies.

We also have to show a healthier path forward. The frustrations that caused so many people to turn in desperate directions for a political voice are not going away when Trump leaves the White House for Mar-a-Lago, because deception and demagoguery are the inevitable consequences of a politics that is profoundly, systemically dysfunctional. We must begin by asking how we got to such a discontented place, where we are mired in lies, rage, and now violence. In this essay, I am focusing on the maladies of the right, but Americans across the political spectrum are falling prey to the siren song of conspiracism. Here are three reasons.

America’s junk-food media diet

The way Americans are consuming and producing news—or what passes for it these days—is driving us mad. This has been said many times, but the problem has worsened in the past five years. On the supply side, media outlets have discovered that dialing up the rhetoric increases clicks, eyeballs, and revenue. On the demand side, readers and viewers like to see their opinions affirmed, rather than challenged. When everybody’s outraged, everybody wins—at least in the short term.

This is not a problem only on the right or only on obscure blogs. The underlying economics that drive Fox News and upstarts such as One America News to cultivate and serve ideologically distinct audiences also drive MSNBC, CNN, and The New York Times. More and more fiercely, media outlets rally their audience behind the latest cause du jour, whether it’s battling supposed election fraud or abolishing local police departments.

The conservative swaths of this media landscape were primed for Trump’s “Stop the steal” lie, which lit the fuse for the January 6 riot. For nine weeks, the president consistently lied that he had “won in a landslide.” Despite the fact that his lawyers and allies were laughed out of court more than 60 times, he spread one conspiracy theory after another across television, radio, and the web. For anyone who wanted to hear that Trump won, a machine of grifters was turning clicks into cash by telling their audiences what they wanted to hear. The liars got rich, their marks got angry, and things got out of control.

America’s institutional collapse

Traditional media outlets are only some of the long-standing institutions collapsing as the digital revolution erodes geographic communities in favor of placeless ones. Many people who yell at strangers on Twitter don’t know their own local officials or even their neighbors across the street. The loss of rootedness and institutional authority has created an opening for populists on the right and the left. It’s not a coincidence that in 2016, millions of Republicans threw in their lot behind a man who for almost all of his life had been a Democratic voter and donor, and millions of Democrats wanted as their nominee a senator who staunchly refused to join their party. On both sides, conventional politicians were being told they had lost the thread.

The anger being directed today at major internet platforms—Twitter, Facebook, and Google, especially—is, in part, a consequence of the fading of traditional political authority. Sometimes intentionally, sometimes inadvertently, Americans have outsourced key parts of political life to Silicon Valley behemoths that were not designed to, and are not competent to, execute functions traditionally in the province of the government. The failure of our traditional political institutions and our traditional media to function as spaces for genuine political conversation has created a vacuum now filled by the social-media giants—who are even worse at the job.

Civic authority has ebbed in other ways. Political incompetence and malpractice around the COVID-19 pandemic have only deepened suspicions that some politicians will never let a crisis go to waste. The decisions in California to keep churches closed but to keep open strip clubs and marijuana dispensaries baffle Main Street. Similarly, the jolting juxtaposition of a media-addict mayor breaking up Hasidic funerals while marching in Black Lives Matter protests not only deepens the cynicism of many Americans, but it indisputably undermined institutions of public health that should have been cautiously protecting their standing.

America’s loss of meaning

Our political sickness has a third cause. At least since World War II, sociologists and political scientists have been tracing the erosion of the institutions and habits that joined neighbors together in bonds of friendship and mutual responsibility. Little Leagues were not just pastimes; soup kitchens were not just service organizations; they were also venues in which people found shared purpose. Today, in many places, those bonds have been severed.

In 1922, G. K. Chesterton called America “a nation with the soul of a church.” But according to a recent study of dozens of countries, none has ditched religious belief faster since 2007 than the U.S. Without going into the causes, we can at least acknowledge one cost: For generations, most Americans understood themselves as children of a loving God, and all had a role to play in loving their neighbors. But today, many Americans have no role in any common story.

Conspiracy theories are a substitute. Support Donald Trump and you are not merely participating in a mundane political process—that’s boring. Rather, you are waging war on a global sex-trafficking conspiracy! No one should be surprised that QAnon has found a partner in the empty, hypocritical, made-for-TV deviant strain of evangelicalism that runs on dopey apocalypse-mongering. (I still consider myself an evangelical, even though so many of my nominal co-religionists have emptied the term of all historic and theological meaning.) A conspiracy theory offers its devotees a way of inserting themselves into a cosmic battle pitting good against evil. This sense of vocation that makes it dangerous is also precisely what makes it attractive in our era of isolated, alienated consumerism.

Whatever the republican Party does, it faces an ugly fight. The fracture that so many politicians on the right have been trying desperately to avoid may soon happen. But if the party has any hope of playing a constructive, rather than destructive, part in America’s future, it must do two things.

First, Republicans must repudiate the nonsense that has set our party on fire. Putting it out will take courage—and I don’t mean merely political courage. This week, after realizing that some Capitol insurrectionists wanted to capture the vice president, several Republican House members said privately that they believed a vote to impeach the president would put their lives, or the lives of their families, at risk. That is not the “constituent engagement” that elected officials are duty-bound to deal with on a daily basis. That is simply tyranny, just from the bottom up, instead of the top down. When arsonists are inside our house, can we just stand by and hope that they’ll depart quietly?

Second, the party has to rebuild itself. It must offer a genuine answer to the frustrations of the past decade. Other than by indulging Trump’s fantasies about building iPhones in America, Republicans have not figured out how to address Americans’ anger about community erosion, massive dislocations in the labor force, or Big Tech’s historically unprecedented role in governing de facto public squares.

Sensing a chance at tribal expansion, some on the left are thrilled by the chaos on the right, and they’re eager to seize the moment to banish from polite society not just those who participated and encouraged violence, but anyone with an R next to his or her name. Already on Twitter, a conservative position as long-standing as opposition to abortion has been recast as “domestic terrorism.” An MSNBC host talked about the “de-Baathification” of the GOP, comparing rank-and-file Republicans to supporters of Saddam Hussein. In an exchange on CNN, a host accused Republican voters of making common cause with Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan. Yet the exploitative overreaction by the left should not allow an underreaction by the right.

The past four years have wounded our country in grievous, long-lasting ways. The mob that rushed the Capitol had been fed a steady diet of lies and conspiracy theories. It is very possible that the QAnon devotee Douglas Jensen believed the junk he’d been sold—that he was a valued foot soldier in Trump’s war against shadowy forces of darkness. So, according to the FBI, he put on his Q T-shirt and acted like a foot soldier. Right up until he ran into Officer Goodman.

In a standoff between the Constitution and madness, both men picked a side. It’s the GOP’s turn to do the same.
 

Maiden Voyage

Gold™ Member
Sep 5, 2014
7,237
8,986
1,125
USA
A few quotes from the Op-Ed worth highlighting.

On the impact of the event, to those who may dismiss it:
January 6 is a new red-letter day in U.S. history, not just because it was the first time that the Capitol had been ransacked since the War of 1812, but because a subset of the invaders apparently were attempting to disrupt a constitutionally mandated meeting of Congress, kidnap the vice president, and somehow force him to declare Trump the victor in an election he lost. En route, the mob ultimately injured scores of law-enforcement officers. The attack led to the deaths of two officers and four other Americans. But the toll could have been much worse: Police located pipe bombs at the headquarters of both the Republican and Democratic National Committees. Investigators discovered a vehicle fully loaded with weaponry and what prosecutors are calling “homemade napalm bombs.”

On the media's impact & the viewers role in radicalizing:
On the supply side, media outlets have discovered that dialing up the rhetoric increases clicks, eyeballs, and revenue. On the demand side, readers and viewers like to see their opinions affirmed, rather than challenged. When everybody’s outraged, everybody wins—at least in the short term.

This is not a problem only on the right or only on obscure blogs. The underlying economics that drive Fox News and upstarts such as One America News to cultivate and serve ideologically distinct audiences also drive MSNBC, CNN, and The New York Times. More and more fiercely, media outlets rally their audience behind the latest cause du jour, whether it’s battling supposed election fraud or abolishing local police departments.

The conservative swaths of this media landscape were primed for Trump’s “Stop the steal” lie, which lit the fuse for the January 6 riot. For nine weeks, the president consistently lied that he had “won in a landslide.” Despite the fact that his lawyers and allies were laughed out of court more than 60 times, he spread one conspiracy theory after another across television, radio, and the web. For anyone who wanted to hear that Trump won, a machine of grifters was turning clicks into cash by telling their audiences what they wanted to hear. The liars got rich, their marks got angry, and things got out of control.

On rebuilding:
Second, the party has to rebuild itself. It must offer a genuine answer to the frustrations of the past decade. Other than by indulging Trump’s fantasies about building iPhones in America, Republicans have not figured out how to address Americans’ anger about community erosion, massive dislocations in the labor force, or Big Tech’s historically unprecedented role in governing de facto public squares.
 

Punished Miku

Gold Member
Jan 13, 2018
6,232
12,364
910
The topic of supply side media hate is addressed really well by Matt Taibbi in his book Hate Inc. Worth a read for those looking for a media critique more modern than Manufacturing Consent. I always forget to mention him, but he's also one of my favorite journalists around today.

Nice to see a republican talking about actually addressing societal issues. No plans suggested though in the article at all other than condemning conspiracy theories. He needs more suggestions than that, with specific policy proposals.
 
Last edited:

MastaKiiLA

Member
Jun 11, 2020
1,627
3,032
375
Ignoring the religious shlock, it's a decent read. Still, he stuck with the party through all his "uncertainty" of the party's direction, and even voted to acquit Trump. So, he's very much part of the problem here. Not really a credible voice when your actions conflict with your words.
 

ManofOne

Plus Member
Nov 4, 2020
4,632
10,352
810
He's wrong about a few things, he should study history a bit more, QANON has been re-fashioned in multiple ways in accordance to the time we live in. You can trace its founding earlier than that and the party has continued to survive.

Tea Party, Birthers, the Anti Masonic Society, the Whig Party.

They evolve with the times, that doesn't mean however they should be underestimated.
 

MastaKiiLA

Member
Jun 11, 2020
1,627
3,032
375
He's wrong about a few things, he should study history a bit more, QANON has been re-fashioned in multiple ways in accordance to the time we live in. You can trace its founding earlier than that and the party has continued to survive.

Tea Party, Birthers, the Anti Masonic Society, the Whig Party.

They evolve with the times, that doesn't mean however they should be underestimated.
This. I was going to mention that Q's proliferation through the party should be blamed more on the Tea Party. The Tea Party movement more than any other saw the first real departure from rationality for the Republican party as a whole IMO. Before that, both Dems and Reps felt fairly moderate. Then Tea Party came about, and things started to go pear-shaped on the right. Q is just the natural evolution of where the party has been heading since then.
 

ManofOne

Plus Member
Nov 4, 2020
4,632
10,352
810
I'll add as well that anybody who actually visited those QANON sites and forums before (I have, out of curiosity) they were taken down will easily realize they're a decentralized structure of beliefs e.g not all of them are racists etc. Some of them are bat-shit crazy and so on and so forth.

Trump is and was their unifying element, with him gone. They'll easily fall apart.
 
Last edited:

infinitys_7th

Gold Member
Oct 1, 2006
11,680
20,805
1,885
I'll add as well that anybody who actually visited those QANON sites and forums before (I have, out of curiosity) they were taken down will easily realize they're a decentralized structure of beliefs e.g not all of them are racists etc. Some of them are bat-shit crazy and so on and so forth.

Trump is and was their unifying element, with him gone. They'll easily fall apart.

IIRC one of the Twitter accounts they follow religiously is run by a friend of 8kun's owner Jim Watkins, or its son's owner. Something like that. It is connected to him.

Waktkins himself is a shady fuck - probably glows, considering the position he is in (expat in Philippines with a bunch of questionable business).
 

FunkMiller

Member
Aug 14, 2014
5,538
19,586
840
Absolute crux of the whole problem in this sentence:

"We can be the party of Eisenhower, or the party of the conspiracist Alex Jones."

The GOP have turned their back on the kind of politics that Eisenhower championed - the politics that made modern America what it is. The party is doomed unless it remembers it post war roots and returns to them.
 

ManofOne

Plus Member
Nov 4, 2020
4,632
10,352
810
IIRC one of the Twitter accounts they follow religiously is run by a friend of 8kun's owner Jim Watkins, or its son's owner. Something like that. It is connected to him.

Waktkins himself is a shady fuck - probably glows, considering the position he is in (expat in Philippines with a bunch of questionable business).

There are a few batshit insane ones and b/c of their position (e.g lawyers, business people etc.) ppl believe that they're someone of such importance that they're privy to never before seen info. They wield that power with dangerously and callously.
 

infinitys_7th

Gold Member
Oct 1, 2006
11,680
20,805
1,885
Absolute crux of the whole problem in this sentence:

"We can be the party of Eisenhower, or the party of the conspiracist Alex Jones."

The GOP have turned their back on the kind of politics that Eisenhower championed - the politics that made modern America what it is. The party is doomed unless it remembers it post war roots and returns to them.

There is no powerful mainstream Republican who wants the Republicans to be the "party of Eisenhower". Trump was closer to that than any politician since Eisenhower. That's why the rats like Liz Cheney are coming out of their holes.
 

ManofOne

Plus Member
Nov 4, 2020
4,632
10,352
810
I'm not so sure. Antifa is a leaderless movement and they are surviving just fine.
qAnon could evolve into adopting some of their tactics.

That could be true as well but I think the difference between QANON and ANTIFA is belief structure. ANTIFA primarily believes the system is inherently and therefore therefore their unifying element is immesurable.

QANON to is attached to Trump, that their belief structures revolve around what he can do for them in fixing what they perceive as problems in society. With him gone and lacking power, they'll move on.
 

FunkMiller

Member
Aug 14, 2014
5,538
19,586
840
There is no powerful mainstream Republican who wants the Republicans to be the "party of Eisenhower". Trump was closer to that than any politician since Eisenhower. That's why the rats like Liz Cheney are coming out of their holes.

Yes.

That's the problem.
 

ManofOne

Plus Member
Nov 4, 2020
4,632
10,352
810
Yes.

That's the problem.

The party of Eisenhower would not win in today's environment. The political spectrum has widen and issues have become more polarizing primarily due to lost of objectivity in the media. Being apolitical is no longer a winning strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arkam

infinitys_7th

Gold Member
Oct 1, 2006
11,680
20,805
1,885
Yes.

That's the problem.

I guess I should add that there are no Democrats either. What is shaping up is a uniparty of neocons and neolibs gleefully doing the same thing as the other while in power and pretending to be mad when out of power. Those were the Clinton-Bush-Obama years. Really the Reagan years too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arkam

FunkMiller

Member
Aug 14, 2014
5,538
19,586
840
The party of Eisenhower would not win in today's environment. The political spectrum has widen and issues have become more polarizing primarily due to lost of objectivity in the media. Being apolitical is no longer a winning strategy.

Disagree, to be honest. Eisenhower type politics would draw many, many people from the centre - who still make up the vast majority of the voting public. Dwight's middle of the road approach would win him a landslide, I think. People are craving a return to the norms of the centre, from the extremes we're having to face these days.
 

Croatoan

They/Them A-10 Warthog
Jun 24, 2014
4,707
3,216
950
I have a big family full of republicans, none of them know what q anon is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Arkam

Ricky_Bee

Banned
Oct 14, 2020
314
391
260
Disagree, to be honest. Eisenhower type politics would draw many, many people from the centre - who still make up the vast majority of the voting public. Dwight's middle of the road approach would win him a landslide, I think. People are craving a return to the norms of the centre, from the extremes we're having to face these days.
Everybody wants the nineties back, but that world is *gone*.
 
  • Empathy
Reactions: CGiRanger

Alcibiades

Member
Jun 6, 2004
5,931
279
1,635
texas
QAnon is mainly being propagated by pro-Democrat outlets that want a juicy story. It's great for drama, but probably did more to influence Democrats than Republicans.


Significantly more Biden supporters knew about QAnon than Trump supporters. Are their crazies out there that really believe it? Sure (and that guy referenced in this editorial may be one of them), but my guess is even most Trump supporters are larping actually belief in this. Everyone loves a good conspiracy theory when talking to others but if you put a gun to their head, do people really believe it?

Blaming Qanon is the lazy way out. People have been let down by government and elitist institutions. That drove Trump support way more than anything else.
 
Last edited:

Arkam

Member
Jan 21, 2012
4,583
4,276
840
Here, Now and maybe later
If QAnon is so bad/dangerous.... stop talking about them MSM. I still have no clue who/what they are, yet I have had two elderly family members ask me about them this week.
 

oagboghi2

Member
Apr 15, 2018
11,384
19,165
675
I have a big family full of republicans, none of them know what q anon is.
Bingo.

This is a minority of people, amplified by bad faith liberals, like many of the posters posting nonsense in this thread, and never trumper republicans who see this as an opportunity to return the GOP to what it was before. A subservient regional party that blows up smokes up voters asses, while allowing democrats to rule.

We saw how Ben Sasse's GOP operated when they were in charge. No ideas, no fight, no solutions to anything. I'm sure Sasse would be happy running Romney like republicans who give you a car salesman smile and reliably lose the presidential election.

The problem is most republicans want politicians who will win, and actually do things.

The 90s?

Eisenhower?
Eisenhower was not a moderate centrist
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Arkam