• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

Batman Forever is not that bad

Nester99

Member
Sep 17, 2016
2,840
3,324
540
BC
I agree it’s not that bad. It’s biggest problem is that too many in that generation it was seen as as a sequel to Tim Burton’s Batman and the new style did not flow well.

On its own, I don’t mind the flick. But Val is not a great Batman, but miles better than Clooney
 

cr0w

Old Member
Aug 31, 2015
3,270
1,594
825
Out of the first four Batman films, Forever is the only one that felt like a comic film that was able to embrace its roots without falling into pure camp the way B&R did. For anyone who says Forever is the reason we got B&R, you're flat out wrong. Returns is the reason we got B&R, because it was such a dark, bizarre film that resulted in a LOT of backlash from parents over its tone and violence that they over corrected and went in the complete opposite direction. Forever was actually a massive financial success, and B&R was dumbed down even farther because the movie was basically made by studio executives and toy companies at that point, and they placed more emphasis on merchandising than they did on the film itself.

The original cut of Forever was a much darker film, as evidenced by the scene with the giant bat where Bruce is remembering who he is after getting shot in the head by Harvey and waking up with amnesia, not remembering his life as Batman. There was an entire subplot cut out of the film that explored Bruce's trauma and his reasons for needing Batman, but it was cut because the studio felt the film was too dark in response to the Returns controversy. I wish we could have gotten a director's cut.

I'll also go to my grave arguing that Tommy Lee Jones played a better Joker than Nicholson did.

Here's an article on the original cut. https://www.denofgeek.com/us/movies/batman/261543/batman-forever-the-version-we-never-got-to-see
 
Last edited:

LegendOfKage

Member
Mar 6, 2018
3,841
5,602
765
The Dark Knight > Batman 89 > Batman Begins > Batman Returns > Batman Forever > The Dark Knight Rises > Batman and Robin.
 

cr0w

Old Member
Aug 31, 2015
3,270
1,594
825
I was nodding along until I got to this. He was just a bit too campy for me, I like the Napier/Joker character a lot more.

I've never really been able to separate Nicholson from his characters as he pretty much plays himself in everything I've ever seen him in. I don't see Joker in the 89 film, I just see Jack in white makeup on a coke binge. That's just my issue though.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
Sep 4, 2018
18,541
36,217
885
40
I've never really been able to separate Nicholson from his characters as he pretty much plays himself in everything I've ever seen him in. I don't see Joker in the 89 film, I just see Jack in white makeup on a coke binge. That's just my issue though.

IMO this is why he was perfect for the role. Watch the Shining and that psychoticness he can tap into is undeniable. His eyebrows kind of have a natural evil arch to them.

The Burton entries are still and will always be my favorite. I loved how gothy and dark they were, like dark fantasy, or like a monster movie. The pathos given to the Penguin for instance only could have come from the director of Edward Scissorhands
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: lock2k

Nymphae

Banned
Jun 3, 2013
14,657
22,892
1,235
Canada
I've never really been able to separate Nicholson from his characters as he pretty much plays himself in everything I've ever seen him in. I don't see Joker in the 89 film, I just see Jack in white makeup on a coke binge. That's just my issue though.

I don't think you're wrong exactly, but I still feel like he is a good fit and played the role wonderfully. His laugh is just perfect.
 

lock2k

Banned
Jun 13, 2018
5,971
9,122
645
Brazil
IMO this is why he was perfect for the role. Watch the Shining and that psychoticness he can tap into is undeniable. His eyebrows kind of have a natural evil arch to them.

The Burton entries are still and will always be my favorite. I loved how gothy and dark they were, like dark fantasy, or like a monster movie. The pathos given to the Penguin for instance only could have come from the director of Edward Scissorhands

Burton's Penguin shits all over other movie villains. Loki? pfff... :D
 

cr0w

Old Member
Aug 31, 2015
3,270
1,594
825
IMO this is why he was perfect for the role. Watch the Shining and that psychoticness he can tap into is undeniable. His eyebrows kind of have a natural evil arch to them.

The Burton entries are still and will always be my favorite. I loved how gothy and dark they were, like dark fantasy, or like a monster movie. The pathos given to the Penguin for instance only could have come from the director of Edward Scissorhands

I don't disagree about him in The Shining, he was perfect for Kubrick's version of Torrence. Unfortunately, I hate Kubrick's version of The Shining :messenger_tears_of_joy:. I don't think Kubrick understood human emotion at all in general, and his Jack Torrance was already cracked before the story started. He was perfectly cast for that particular version of the character, however.

I actually do like Burton's Batman films quite a bit, but they're very much Tim Burton films with Batman making occasional appearances as opposed to Batman films directed by Tim Burton. The physical sets and soundstages constructed for the films were incredible achievements. I just already had my ideal versions of the characters in my head from the comics (A Death in the Family specifically) I read before the movie hit, so the Burton films kind of gave me whiplash as a kid with their takes on the characters, Joker especially. I just can't see tubby, grumpy Jack Nicholson as anything but tubby, grumpy Jack Nicholson when I'd already become accustomed to the slim, brutal character from the books. Like I said though, those are all my issues, I don't expect anyone else to feel the same.
 

cr0w

Old Member
Aug 31, 2015
3,270
1,594
825
The fucking nipples. Schumacher wanted the suits to evoke images of Roman statues and shit, so his big idea was to add fucking nipples to them.
 
  • LOL
Reactions: lock2k

brap

Banned
Jan 9, 2018
13,819
37,688
1,185
The fucking nipples. Schumacher wanted the suits to evoke images of Roman statues and shit, so his big idea was to add fucking nipples to them.
What an idiot. We needed bat dick.
 

Doom85

Member
Mar 3, 2018
1,663
1,719
460
Batman and Robin is the worst movie but I actually personally hate Forever more because while one could easily tell B&R was going to be a trainwreck, Forever initially showed promise. For one thing, Schumacher wanted to keep the tone consistent with the Burtom movies (but WB felt Returns alienated kids from seeing it so they forced him to make it family-friendly). Kilmer seems like a good choice to play Batman. While it sucks we lost Billy Dee Williams, Tommy Lee Jones was a great pick for Two-Face. Jim Carrey totally could portray the smug yet brilliant Riddler. Nicole Kidman was playing an original character but regardless great actress so all good. The only weak link was Chris O'Donnell who was too old to play Dick Grayson, maybe if they had skipped the origin and had as Nightwing right away it would have worked but they really should have cast someone 15-17 years old (or can pull off the look of that age like Tom Holland).

But then the film came out and was a total let down. Kilmer is trying but just doesn't give the best performance (and apparently the mask doesn't let him breathe through his nose considering he never shuts his mouth). Jones doesn't play Two-Face but an obnoxious clone of the Joker and completely glosses over his entire origin. Carrey just acts like he's in one of his usual comedies and doesn't feel anything like the Riddler. Nicole Kidman plays an adult woman who acts like a horny teenager considering virtually all her dialogue is trying to get into Batman's pants even if its involves misusing police equipment! And O'Donnell sucks. There's plenty of other problems too like Batman spending so much time giving Grayson shit for wanting to kill Two-Face, but then he clearly kills Two-Face at the end with the coins trick as he knew Two-Face couldn't resist grabbing for them (and unlike Two-Face and Talia in the Nolan trilogy where their deaths felt unavoidable given the circumstances, here it just felt unnecessary, like he couldn't have tried to catch Two-Face with a grappling hook or something). The film tries to be goofy and serious at the same time which granted can work on occasion (see the Batman: Brave and the Bold cartoon) but does not have the competence to pull it off. The one good moment is when Two-Face declares he will murder the Graysons if Batman doesn't show up and reveal his identity, Bruce immediately stands up and screams that he's Batman. That is fucking awesome. He's willing to sacrifice any possibility of a normal life just to ensure a few innocent people don't die. Good stuff. Sadly it's a lone gem in a pile of shit.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
Sep 4, 2018
18,541
36,217
885
40
Tommy Lee Jones was a cool Two-Face*. loved his split in half evil lair with Sugar and Spice


*though still pisses me off we never got our Billy Dee Williams Two-Face Burton sequel
 
  • Like
Reactions: pramod

sol_bad

Member
Jan 17, 2006
7,069
5,172
1,765
I was 12 years old when this movie came out and I distinctly remember being repulsed by this whole film as I sat in the cinema watching it. Maybe it was because I was a cool and edgy teenager and I wanted cool, dark, gothic and edgy Batman. I doubt it though as I am still repulsed by the film.
 

VulcanRaven

Member
Jan 7, 2018
2,636
3,192
560
The used Danny Elfman's music from the previous movies in the first trailer:

I wonder if they originally planned to use the same theme? Maybe the new musics weren't ready when that was released.
 
Last edited:

Badlucktroll

Junior Member
Aug 28, 2007
3,584
1,084
1,425
Here is a lovely photoshop of Keaton in the Sonar suit in Batman Forever. He makes it look cool and serious. He was actually fitted for this costume, as you see in my previous post.
 
Dec 17, 2015
233
234
445
I saw the four 90s Batman movies for the first time a few years ago. Well, three and a half of them. I have a really low bar for movies, and I'm fine with camp, but even I couldn't watch Batman & Robin all the way through.

With that said, I loved Forever. The "over the top" nature of the villains disliked by a lot of posters in this thread is what sold it for me. The Riddler and Two Face really hammed it up, but didn't take it too far, and that's what kept the movie grounded IMO. I thought Robin was funny, too. I think there's something about Batman that just doesn't work for live action, so a movie that didn't take itself too seriously (without ODing on camp) hit the right note for me.
 

Badlucktroll

Junior Member
Aug 28, 2007
3,584
1,084
1,425
Just found this online. Is it real? I read it. It reminds me of Batman Forever. I can just picture Nic Cage in the role of Crane/Scarecrow. The fear gas skull shaped thingies are pretty cool. Bruce has some pretty scary hallucinations. Reminds me of a horror movie.
I know it says Batman Triumphant at the top (the actual title was Batman Unchained) but thats not actually the title of the script, just a filename someone made.
 
Last edited:

Elcid

Banned
Jul 27, 2018
3,058
4,886
720
I re-watched Batman Forever recently and I really liked it. Many seem to really dislike both Batman movies by Joel Schumacher. I admit that Batman & Robin was a big misstep but they are entertaining and I would watch them any day over Batman v Superman or Justice League. Forever was a lot darker than I remembered and Val Kilmer is very good as Batman. I wish he would have been in the sequel too. The movie looks great visually and it has a great soundtrack:


Also that Batmobile is my favorite after the Burton one. One thing they could have done better are the villians because they are too over the top and cartoony. I don't hate them because I like both actors. There are many funny scenes with them. I hope we get a new version of the movie some day because there are many deleted scenes:


Why they removed that? It would have made the movie better and darker.
EviLore EviLore how do I unlike something very hard?
 

sol_bad

Member
Jan 17, 2006
7,069
5,172
1,765
How is this thread still going? It's such a terrible film, end of discussion.
lol
 

switchback27

Member
Jul 26, 2018
633
524
385
It is redeemed by prime hotness Nicole Kidman. And of course, a post-Under Siege insane Tommy Lee Jones (not really, but I just wanted a reason to bring up Under Siege).

And it is helped by Batman and Robin being such a shitshow--having your successor be worthless so that people see you in a more favorable light is such a great (albeit accidental) strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pramod

pramod

Member
Oct 24, 2017
2,847
3,456
760
Forever had the best action scenes in a Batman movie until BvS came along. Come at me bro.
 
Last edited:

cr0w

Old Member
Aug 31, 2015
3,270
1,594
825
I think the biggest shock to me when I saw it in theaters especially after seeing the first two so much was the completely different approach to the design of the film. It's worth watching for that alone, because it's so vibrant and an absolute 180 from the drabness of the first two (which was of course by design). Between that and the villain performances it was a pretty perfect mesh of the Burton tone with the '60s TV show, which I also grew up watching. I loved what the movie did, for the most part. Still think Chris O'Donnell was a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pramod