I mean, you can easily take both sides depending on your priorities.
Here's a mental exercise: we know that (at least in the US) black population is represented more, as a percentage, in prison than whites. We ask a question:
- Are black people genetically more inclined to commit crimes?
- Is there something in their socio-economic situation that makes them more inclined to commit crimes?
Now we can easily hold view no. 1, with the only problem of it being racist. We move then to view no. 2 - we can conclude (supported by data) that the socio-economical situation has an effect on crime. Literally - poor people are more likely to commit crime.
Once that is agreed upon we ask ourselves:
- Do we keep the situation as it is and tell underprivileged people to 'bootstrap it'?
- We put in place policies to reduce the inequality, which in practice involves giving preferential treatment to the underprivileged until the situation equalizes itself
Even if you tell people to "bootstrap it' - once again, fact is all other factors being equal whites need to bootstrap LESS than equal black citizens - poor white families have higher income than poor black families ; when you cannot distinguish anything about socio-economic status whites are stopped by police and questioned way less than blacks.