You might enjoy this one then if you haven't already seen it.
This is a good look, but he's really missing the social commentary on our relationship to creations. For example, all of this humanity being chased and discovered is greatly spurned on and first manifested to it's greatest end (self-sacrifice for love) by Joi, who was in many ways the "least human" of them all. Nonetheless, when her creators aspired to make her everything beautiful and admirable about humanity, they inadvertently succeeded in full. As though it were a secret hidden in DNA, far beyond the parameters of her domestic consumer purpose, she grew into manifesting these characteristics of gratitude, wonder, care, curiosity, discovery and creativity, and all for the purpose of giving of oneself in an ultimate sense for the love of other. It is no subtle hint that this is integral to K's epiphany that turns him around back onto his decided purpose.
Within that fact, you see a relation of us to our creations where all of this construction this video talks about can happen accidentally, and thus come back to us in all the things we make to separate ourselves from our humanity or to transcend it. Where has mankind gone in this world? As he says in this video, they have lost their connection to nature, and now live in a not only artificial but commercialized existence. The real had been replaced by the imaginary as nature was pushed further and further away from us by our own acts of construction. While we made pretend computer girlfriends and, presumably, distanced ourselves more and more of our procreative capacities, it is our creations that come to most highly demonstrate human respect and value for being a born creature and seek the secrets of meaning that we had forsaken in our effort to transcend those limits.
That is very obviously shown since the touchpoint between humans and the creations seeking the meaning of life is a mastermind seeking to master procreation simply to turn it into another artificial power serving us. Which, if you'll remember, is exactly the disdainful existence we had committed our own actual children to serve in the scrapper area of the film, where children are most prominently shown. Contrast that treatment against the revered treatment of the born replicant and you'll see the contrast between selfish ambitions of our creative powers in the front of our consciousness and the subconscious human longings that are unrealized until they are witnessed within those creations.
So then take a step back and ask what it is saying to us as we develop the age of technology? As our interactions with each other and with life itself become more and more transposed into virtual representations of our dreams and idealized forms? That we are speaking to each other now over online forums, our social network platforms, in videogame worlds? How much do we use these to connect with our own humanity, and how much do we use them to try and escape or transcend our humanity? Is that what is really going on, or do they accidentally serve a purpose of being a mirror that reflects back to us the deepest yearnings and truest character of ourselves that we stopped recognizing? Does this go on being accidental, or are we like K when he turns around, using awareness of this relationship to utilize them as a resource of understanding opportunities of purpose and connection to others?
I'm not just interpreting all this out of what isn't there. There are hundreds of little moments throughout the film that draw out all of these things and provide some of its own insights into the possible answers to those questions. Between the construct of the world they are in, K's boss, interactions with Deckard and even the symbolism around the area where Deckard is living. The film is astonishingly dense with meaning and carries multiple developing lines of narrative on its layers of themes that it explores. I'm convinced there is intentionally some clever meanings in analysis of the chronological development of how this world came to be as well, as the whole time K is chasing back through past events of society and connection with the first film and Deckard recalls his own motivations.
