watWait, so the female (if they choose) POC are the villains?? Of course.
Purge white male developers ASAP.
I can really tell you noped out lol.
The reactions here are tame compared to how Reset would respond to something they don’t like. There maybe have been a few hot tales but for the most part there hasn’t been anything close to reset levels of hyperbole.
Nice try.
The funny thing is if you want great black characters in Far Cry game the very best place for them is as villains. Aside from FC3's Brody the protags tend to be underdeveloped in the series, but they always deliver great villains.
I'll just leave this here: https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2018/...nting-down-sjws-in-the-post-apocalypse/73073/
White male gamer logic: *Sees black female protagonist* lol get your forced politics out of muh games! Strong white males only!
Anyways Farcry is so played out at this point hard pass.
yet the male cries are flowing in this thread its sad that they see everything attached with a female as "sjw propaganda"Jokes on you, they are the villain.
yet the male cries are flowing in this thread its sad that they see everything attached with a female as "sjw propaganda"
yet the male cries are flowing in this thread its sad that they see everything attached with a female as "sjw propaganda"
I'll just leave this here: https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2018/...nting-down-sjws-in-the-post-apocalypse/73073/
How do you know they are males?
I'll just leave this here: https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2018/...nting-down-sjws-in-the-post-apocalypse/73073/
Thank you Ubisoft, for being inclusive to Antifa haters such as myself. I will do my best to restore peace, civilization and patriarchy.
Like other "anti-sjw" sites it farms reader outrage by caricaturing and cherry picking. Basically Fox News for gamers. Go try to source the details in that article there and realize it's mostly manufactured to trigger irrational tribalism about how terrible those other people are which in turn conveniently forms a protective shell around their simplistic world view
Step 1: Far Cry cover is released.
Step 2: People make assumptions.
Step 3: Game is nothing like those assumptions.
Step 4: Forget any of this happened, and await the next Far Cry cover. It's the circle of life.
Remember the stereotypical "gay" villain in Far Cry 4? Remember the "deeply racist far-right" cult in Fallout 5? None of these things actually happened, and if you think Ubisoft is going to release a game that's not designed to appeal to a mainstream audience, I doubt you're right. Whatever form this game takes, I don't think it's going to be what any liberal or conservative extremists want it to be, and I don't think it's going to be making any controversial and divisive political statements that could harm potential sales.
It's also worth it to note that the last three Far Cry game covers have shown the antagonist in a position of power. If they continue that trend, those two girls will likely be the villains. And if that's true, and if this game IS somehow about gender or race (as the conclusions people are jumping to would suggest) you're going to be playing as a person fighting their tyranny.
But again, whatever they do, I think it's absolutely going to be designed to appeal to a mainstream audience.
Sources? Examples? The 'Fox News' instead of 'CNN' remark makes your comment already suspicious.
I don't get it. Are these bi-yearly releases of games like this any good? I don't really how they could be. Ubisoft seems to be more and more like EA everyday.
Almost every story they regurgitate from other sources is polemically altered with little concern for facts or charitable interpretation to stoke outrage
I don't disagree with that statement and their games are usually technically sound.We can say a lot of things... but the support ubisoft can put in their games is totally on another level.
But question is: Are they gonna last the entire game alive and as villains or are they going to be replaced by another less than interesting villain after midgame? It takes some guts to make a non-white char with traits of "big bad guy/girl" and stick with that until the very end. I have to admit that even though I considered those two sisters just plain assholes.Not getting the surprise over the Williams Sisters being the Villians tbh. Seems like the Villians have been on the cover of 3, 4 & 5.
Quoting myself from earlier in the thread, when the only thing we had to go on was the box art:
Now we actually have details, and it would seem the plot of this game has nothing to do with race or gender, so why are we still talking about race and gender?
So is this a single player game ?
The autism in this thread is amazing
One side is autistic because they can't see Activision is pandering.
The other is autistic for caring so fucking much.
there is no outrage at least from people with any brain, its soo obvious that ubisoft is basically begging for word of mouth via outrage that its eye rolling.I don't get the outrage.
Anyway, it's far cry. It's going to be an ok game and that's it.
I believe the correct outrage should be at Ubi releasing FC5 DLC and calling it a new game.I don't get the outrage.
I mean seriously I just played Far Cry 5 this summer and this is coming out in February? Hahah I smell a asset flip, its going to be the exact same game. Way to early for a new Farcry.Finally, a new target for haters has emerged. Now I can play Battlefield and Fallout 76 in peace. This game has B.O.M.B written all over it...it's way too soon to go back to Hope County and the game appears to be amalgamating a bunch of games and ideas together to capitalize on them...Mad Max, Rage, Fallout Homefront, etc...
Far Cry Primal at least was completely different between main releases...this seem just terrible in almost every way to me.
edit: I am a gigantic Far Cry fan too.
Somehow I doubt that given the sheer amount of inclusive revisionism that took place throughout AC: Odyssey.
Wait, so the female (if they choose) POC are the villains?? Of course.
Purge white male developers ASAP.
The autism in this thread is amazing
One side is autistic because they can't see Activision is pandering.
The other is autistic for caring so fucking much.
So now that it turns out that the ladies on the cover are the villains do we now have go from one group of snowflakes complaining about a PC/SJW agenda to another complaining about racism and stereotyping?!