Doom_Bringer said:this is coming to ps3 and 360 right?
megateto said:Does one of the scans say something about videos on a dvd?
That's good. If it's anything like Far Cry, the game will be throw-away...but the engine will be gold.The engine is. The game hasn't been confirmed..
dark10x said:That's good. If it's anything like Far Cry, the game will be throw-away...but the engine will be gold.
Hopefully someone else puts it to use this time.
It provided good visuals and a great sense of scale for me, but I *hated* the gunplay, AI, scenario and mission design, as well as everything else related to actual gameplay. The act of exploring the islands was moderately entertaining, however.AltogetherAndrews said:Far Cry a "throw away"? It had plenty of issues, but the highlights certainly provided me with a gaming experience that has still to be matched.
dark10x said:It provided good visuals and a great sense of scale for me, but I *hated* the gunplay, AI, scenario and mission design, as well as everything else related to actual gameplay. The act of exploring the islands was moderately entertaining, however.
Of course, who's to say that these guys can't change, eh? Perhaps they'll get their shit together and deliver some well designed missions and good AI.
Let's just say I completely disagree and felt that the AI was terrible while working properly and absolutely unbearable when it wasn't.AltogetherAndrews said:Uh, the A.I. [when functional] was arguably the best in any game at the time. The biggest problem with Far Cry was that the A.I. would at times pretty much break down. A lot of bugs, unfortunately.
There is nothing to "disagree" with; you're wrong, it's that simple. You may not appreciate it, but to say it was bad is just plain wrong.dark10x said:Let's just say I completely disagree and felt that the AI was terrible while working properly and absolutely unbearable when it wasn't.
Yeah, that was a problem.golem said:no, the biggest problem with far cry was the fact you spend half your time fighting those stupid mutants. otherwise the game was pretty good.
No, I don't think so.AltogetherAndrews said:There is nothing to "disagree" with; you're wrong, it's that simple.
Ninja Scooter said:damn thats some hot shit. Looks about on par with MGS4 from those screens. Is Crysis the game or just Crytek's new engine?
There is nothing to "disagree" with; you're wrong, it's that simple.
Warm Machine said:On par with MGS4? This destroys it.
Jacobi said:Has someone bought&read the preview ? Is there something about the requirements ?
Jacobi said:Has someone bought&read the preview ? Is there something about the requirements ?
Sounds too goodXdrive05 said:I think I could make out something about 2.0 GHz, pixel shader 2.0, and 512mb RAM. Of course, that's just picking numbers out of the text.
For all I know it could have been saying something about the staypuffed marshmallow man.
Agreed. wtf was he smokingWarm Machine said:On par with MGS4? This destroys it.
Kobold said:Is this the game EA is publishing for Crytek?
Thanks! Looks uber!Guns N' Poops said:Yes, they list EA as the publisher.
quiznos said:isnt this engine based on DirectX 10? this will take over PS3 and Xbox 360 graphics in 2007 when Dx10 comes out.
I thought Vista was scheduled for release in Q4 06 [same as Crysis, according to the infobox]?quiznos said:isnt this engine based on DirectX 10? this will take over PS3 and Xbox 360 graphics in 2007 when Dx10 comes out.