Activists and SJW's both practice forms of activism; the difference is in their philosophy.
To borrow from another post, to understand SJW's more, you'd need a little background on philosophers like Simone de Beauvoir and Camille Paglia. In their writing, they describe the natural human state as being one of a never-ending series of tests against an indifferent state of nature. Society then, becomes a
kind of artificially constructed safe space made by humans to make these contests more bearable.
Author's such as Paglia vehemently reject SJW philosophy because of its inversion of this, where society becomes the natural human state, indifferent biological nature is the artificial construct. Just take a moment to soak in what that means.
Society is nature; indifferent biological nature
doesn't wholly exist.
This is why SJW's are so stuck on
"moral crusading-as-activism" to change society, and have so many epic meltdowns when routed. They live in a "natural state" that literally
cannot wholly function without constant social validation and groupthink reinforcement. Like, who would want to go
out of their way to be The Chosen Few in a human reality
that flimsy?
So:
Activist: is any person with an interest in advocating a cause for a variety of personal or impersonal reasons or concerns.
SJW: is any person, who superficially demonstrates
a form of activism, while
in function, demonstrates moral\ideological tribalism for social validation and groupthink reinforcement to achieve a
"natural state" of safety.
The activist participates in activism as a the activist wills; society
is the safe space. Addressing\meeting the need is the win condition.
The SJW requires sufficient
"natural state of safety" qualifiers to be met (e.g. trigger warnings etc...) before participating in
anything as a realized being. Being accepted and "safe" is the win condition, addressing\meeting the need is only as important as in how the need facilitates the safe space.
One is a cultist, one is not.
Addendum:
tl;dr: They need a
safe space from the
safe space of society because harsh, indifferent,
biological nature is the fake social construct, and it is
society that is somehow both
absolute and malleable. It really is an Orwellian nightmare of doublethink and contradictory nonsense. It's no wonder they're losing it.
ed.