• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Deus Ex: Human Revolution now has ads on load screens. Billboard ads incoming also.

Kinda screwed up to follow up patched in ads with paid DLC. Oh well, Deus Ex didn't get good again by NOT selling it's soul!
 
jediyoshi said:
if you pirate a game because there are ads during the loading screen, you are totally justified! brb while I pirate every tv show ever and some movies just because those trailers are kind of a hassle too.

who said that? all im saying this is just another dev pushing more customers away. I dont want to pay 60 bucks on a game to get my face full of ads when i can spend that on a different one and avoid it. How do you take my post as saying they are justified? jesus. All im saying is that this leads to bad judgement over devs -> more piracy.
 
MaddenNFL64 said:
I do have some fucking personal ethics. This isn't that big of a deal, but if I was told beforehand this game would have advertising, it would make me think. I'm not into paying up the ass for stuff, then getting procter & gamble products advertised to me while I wait for an area to load.
Again, how do you feel about product placement in Tv shows and movies?
 
Duke Togo said:
Lets complain needlessly. That's why this place exists, after all. Criticize, flip out, purchase and play game anyways.
People paid for the game and shouldn't have to put up with this shit, especially since they didn't know beforehand.
 
Unreal how ads are seeping into gaming these days. I didn't read the whole thread but I'm sure there is a "why are you crying" group in here.
 
If they are pulling this crap now the chances of me buying a sequel have plummeted to almost nothing. As said if this was done to lower the price of the game or it was free that's one thing. Or we were getting something in return. This certainly isn't the case.
 
I'm kind of against this but at the same time I am ok with them doing this on loading screens. I just don't see it as a huge problem. If you had to listen to some in-game character talk about the benefits of Allstate Insurance in the middle of a quest, then that's where things get fucked up.
 
SalsaShark said:
who said that? all im saying this is just another dev pushing more customers away. I dont want to pay 60 bucks on a game to get my face full of ads when i can spend that on a different one and not avoid it.

BF3 is loseing sales... I bet they are gonna have ads like in BC
 
I'm really bothered by all the negative feedback this is gathering.

I've said it a million times before and I'll say it again now, but if games want to keep advancing we're also going to have to see a higher profit margin to justify the ridiculous costs of development.

We're also talking about a game that has been HEAVILY discounted since week 1. Its a great game, the ads in my opinion are non-intrusive as its not like you're picking up a in-game book/reading an email and its saying "BUY the STAR WARS™ Blu-ray collection now!", its in the loading screens which I barely watch.

I think the gaming community is very whiny when it comes to self-entitlement issues like this.

I also can't believe the complaints these days when we continue to see anybody but the AAA studios get shut down or lay-off half their staff.

This makes me sad.
 
Calcaneus said:
Again, how do you feel about product placement in Tv shows and movies?

TV is primarily an ad-supported medium. With films it really depends on how heavy handed they are about it. Honestly, it can also be done in a way which actually increases the authenticity of the world, Mad Men being an obvious example
 
markot said:
Thats different, its an ad that gives life to a scene, sure its coke, but whatever. Its more about the future being projected, the ads everywhere... etc...

This isnt what they did in this game, its during a loading screen >.> Its like Blade Runner having an add pop up in the corner during one of the movies 'slow' bits >.<

That's because Blade Runner was set in the future and the future is NOW! Megacorps run everything, pop-up ads in our vidya games, puttin' chips in our brains, lord what's next???
 
sersteven said:
I'm really bothered by all the negative feedback this is gathering.

I've said it a million times before and I'll say it again now, but if games want to keep advancing we're also going to have to see a higher profit margin to justify the ridiculous costs of development.

The development costs are the problem. Ads like this are a symptom.

Consumers have no responsibility to bear for it.
 
hamchan said:
...The game couldn't have bombed that badly right? Why do they feel the need to do this?

I bet Lucas is desperate to sell those blurays after all the crappy press the changes made to them are getting.
 
Wallach said:
The development costs are the problem. Ads like this are a symptom.

Consumers have no responsibility to bear for it.

Exactly. If their budgets are so bloated and out of control that they have to resort to patching advertisements in their games, then maybe it's time to start reevaluating things. We shouldn't have to "pitch-in" when we're already paying $50-60 for new games.
 
sersteven said:
I'm really bothered by all the negative feedback this is gathering.

I've said it a million times before and I'll say it again now, but if games want to keep advancing we're also going to have to see a higher profit margin to justify the ridiculous costs of development.

We're also talking about a game that has been HEAVILY discounted since week 1. Its a great game, the ads in my opinion are non-intrusive as its not like you're picking up a in-game book/reading an email and its saying "BUY the STAR WARS™ Blu-ray collection now!", its in the loading screens which I barely watch.

I think the gaming community is very whiny when it comes to self-entitlement issues like this.

I also can't believe the complaints these days when we continue to see anybody but the AAA studios get shut down or lay-off half their staff.

This makes me sad.

We should be thankful for everything! bend over!

Id take the game for 60 bucks instead of 50 over this. Games arent doing this, games are getting good revenue and this game didnt bombed. Sure, development costs get more expensive and they'll have to sort that out the moment AAA games stop making money, we are not in those times.
 
SalsaShark said:
I bet Lucas is desperate to sell those blurays after all the crappy press the changes made to them are getting.
You would think he would have learned after the huge backlashes to the previous changes. Kinda fits they are doing something the customer doesnt want to promote it lol.
 
Calcaneus said:
Again, how do you feel about product placement in Tv shows and movies?

[sarcasm]Oh ok...because ads in TV shows are there already, lets just go ahead and add them to games. While we are at it lets go ahead and add them to Music CD's as well so I can hear an ad between each song.[/sarcasm]

Ads suck no matter what but they are commonplace in TV Shows since you are basically only paying to have access to channels, much like you are paying to access the internet but there are still ads all over the place.

You are paying for games directly, and I really dont want ads in my games to become a trend.

So just because ads are already in TV shows does not mean it's a valid argument that it's ok to have them in games...especially singleplayer only games that rely on an immersive atmosphere.
 
Calcaneus said:
Again, how do you feel about product placement in Tv shows and movies?
I hate this argument because product placement can easily fit into a real life setting. Not all films are based in an alternative dimension where McDonald's and other places and products cease to exist.
 
Calcaneus said:
Again, how do you feel about product placement in Tv shows and movies?

Never had a problem with product placement, because they don't spend time selling me on the product. If they do, i do get fucking pissed. But if Jensen is just drinking a fucking coke while he reads an ebook, I would be amused. Then i'd go drink a Pepsi.

I would care if when the movie hits a slow section, like driving a car, I see fucking Coke ads pop up while I watch. If you can't see the difference, well I don't care if you don't see it.
 
sersteven said:
I'm really bothered by all the negative feedback this is gathering.
Ninja patching ads in after I've bought the game is bullshit, pure and simple. If a game wants to have ads, go for it, but give me the choice.

Either offer the full priced version without ads or state upfront if I'm going to see this kind of stuff in-game. This is not OK. I wouldn't have bought this game had I known it would patch in ads.

How's Steam's refund policy?
 
sersteven said:
I think the gaming community is very whiny when it comes to self-entitlement issues like this.
Holy shit. How is it that I'm still stunned when I read garbage like this?

As far as I'm concerned, if the industry needs to resort to tactics like this to survive (and it doesn't), let it burn.
 
jim-jam bongs said:
TV is primarily an ad-supported medium. With films it really depends on how heavy handed they are about it. Honestly, it can also be done in a way which actually increases the authenticity of the world, Mad Men being an obvious example
I don't know, I'm way more "offended" when something goes out of its way to advertise in the actual movie/show/game.

I'll take a small ad in a loading screen over the recent RAGE product placement going on lately in Breaking Bad any day. But on both cases, it doesn't really bother me more than just getting a "really?" out of me. Maybe I'm just a sheep consumer who has no self-respect, I don't know.
 
Calcaneus said:
Again, how do you feel about product placement in Tv shows and movies?

Im gonna answer this even though it isnt directed towards me:

when i buy the dvd/bluray season of a show, they dont come with ad breaks. That's what you should be comparing this too.
 
Doesn't bother me, but I can see it becoming worse if this is deemed acceptable. If the point is it's just a loading screen so who cares, why not have the whole loading screen be an ad? Then you'd never be quite sure if the game was actually loading the whole time or deliberately stalling to show more ads.
 
It's just a loading screen so I don't really care. At least it's not on billboards in the actual game like they would on say...an EA game.
 
SalsaShark said:
We should be thankful for everything! bend over!

Id take the game for 60 bucks instead of 50 over this. Games arent doing this, games are getting good revenue and this game didnt bombed. Sure, development costs get more expensive and they'll have to sort that out the moment AAA games stop making money, we are not in those times.

Aren't we though? I know this is a bad case for my argument because Deus Ex has sold about 3 million copies as of now, but I continue to notice how pitifully non-shooter/non-established franchise games sell.

And again, I still defend it by saying that this is a game that sold nearly half off a few weeks into its release window. I personally got it for $45 from steam for pre-ordering.

I also stated that as long as non-intrusive I'm okay with it. I'd be all aboard this bandwagon if it were shoving it in my face, but its not. The day it does, I'll be right behind you.
 
Giolon said:
That's because so often they are very slippery. This little postage stamp, I don't give two shits about. It might ruin a screenshot I maybe would have wanted to take of the cool loading screen. That's about it.

But again, wait until some marketer comes in and says to the devs, "Hey, since you've got ads on this loading screen, what if you just added a couple seconds to the load time so we could get more ad play on there? We could maybe rotate through a couple of them. And you know, we've got access to the sound interface at this point too right? And we know their speakers are on b/c they're playing this game. Let's make it a video ad."

If you don't think these conversations are already happening or that they aren't going to happen very soon, I think you are naive.

I don't think they will happen very soon.. and how do you get off calling me naive? That is just some crazy ass titles you are throwing around son..

Load times or streaming ads will get killed in the mass media.. even if you pay to the a 98% score the reviewer will still talk about it..
 
I thought the game already had advertisements in it? or is the lack of subtly on the Star Wars one the issue? which is understandable.

Also anyone confirm yet whether this is on the console version as well?
 
sersteven said:
Aren't we though? I know this is a bad case for my argument because Deus Ex has sold about 3 million copies as of now, but I continue to notice how pitifully non-shooter/non-established franchise games sell.

And again, I still defend it by saying that this is a game that sold nearly half off a few weeks into its release window. I personally got it for $45 from steam for pre-ordering.

I also stated that as long as non-intrusive I'm okay with it. I'd be all aboard this bandwagon if it were shoving it in my face, but its not. The day it does, I'll be right behind you.

I'll give you this:

If a non-first person shooter with a great, innovative idea but no notion over if there's an audience for it, but it such a cool and new idea that they want to try it out anyway and have to find a way through development cost: sure, i'll buy it. As long as they tell me about this beforehand.

A triple AAA first person shooter made by a big studio adding ads post-release after i already bought the thing? yeah no.
 
Derrick01 said:
It's just a loading screen so I don't really care. At least it's not on billboards in the actual game like they would on say...an EA game.

I actually liked that in Crackdown. Took me forever to realize I was seeing ads and not some genius on behalf of the devs to change up billboards to keep the city dynamic.
 
MaddenNFL64 said:
Never had a problem with product placement, because they don't spend time selling me on the product. If they do, i do get fucking pissed. But if Jensen is just drinking a fucking coke while he reads an ebook, I would be amused. Then i'd go drink a Pepsi.

I would care if when the movie hits a slow section, like driving a car, I see fucking Coke ads pop up while I watch. If you can't see the difference, well I don't care if you don't see it.
I haven't played this game, but is there more to the loading screens than just a splash image? If there isn't, than I don't think its the same as having an ad play while someone is driving during the movie. And I would be more pissed if Jensen was drinking a Coke and they blatantly focus the camera so that you can see the logo. I'd take a star wars thumbnail in a loading screen over that easily.

Guys, I'm not trying to defend this stuff, I just don't get where the hyperbolic comments are coming from. Really, you're gonna reconsider getting the sequel over this? To be fair, only one or two people went that far.
 
This all makes perfect sense.

Just think what new 'features' will be in the ultra final bluray Star Wars set in 20 years.

I might start rioting too.
 
sersteven said:
I'm really bothered by all the negative feedback this is gathering.

I've said it a million times before and I'll say it again now, but if games want to keep advancing we're also going to have to see a higher profit margin to justify the ridiculous costs of development.

We're also talking about a game that has been HEAVILY discounted since week 1. Its a great game, the ads in my opinion are non-intrusive as its not like you're picking up a in-game book/reading an email and its saying "BUY the STAR WARS™ Blu-ray collection now!", its in the loading screens which I barely watch.

I think the gaming community is very whiny when it comes to self-entitlement issues like this.

I also can't believe the complaints these days when we continue to see anybody but the AAA studios get shut down or lay-off half their staff.

This makes me sad.
It's not a goddamn entitlement issue to figure that if you're paying 50 or 60 or even 40 dollars for a game, you shouldn't have ads patched in after the fact.

It would be different if it was something you accessed for free. Then the developers could use the ads to help offset some of the costs.

But you know what else offsets the costs? THE GODDAMN MONEY I PAID FOR THE GAME.

This is fucking bullshit. Every time something like this happens, a publisher makes a money grab and it makes the game experience just a little bit worse, and if a gamer has the TEMERITY to complain about having ads forced into a game they've ALREADY paid for, or having items that used to be standard in games now being stuck behind an extra pay wall, they're being "whiny" and having "entitlement issues."

How about fuck off with that shit? How's that for an entitlement issue?

And hell yes I'm entitled to some things. If I drop 45 bucks on a piece of entertainment, you're damn right I'm entitled to not ALSO have intrusive ads popping up in my face. Hell that's why I don't buy wrestling pay per views any more. Last time I bought one they also threw commercials and unrelated movie trailers into the broadcast. I'm not PAYING to have ads shoved in front of my face. Go to hell with that.

And that "if games are going to advance we have to put up with this" nonsense is complete and utter bullshit. There are plenty of devs and publishers making kickass games that don't shove ads in your face every ten minutes, and are way more complex than Deus Ex. But I guess what you really mean by "games advancing" is "graphics and CGI advancing", so my games look more like movies.

Well guess what? If ads popped up during scene changes in a movie or TV show Blu-Ray I bought, I'd be ticked off. And so would you, if you're honest with yourself. I'm sick of all this boo-hoo bullshit about "oh we developers and publishers are so poor we HAVE to do this stuff or else we can't survive, whine whine bitch bitch." And it always comes back to more money coming out of the player's pocket, or shoving an ad in the player's face, or making the player's experience shorter or dumber or worse.

FUCK. THAT. SHIT.
 
poke poke poke. it continues.

once again, consumers suffer because the publishers are greedy/can't budget for shit.
 
SalsaShark said:
I'll give you this:

If a non-first person shooter with a great, innovative idea but no notion over if there's an audience for it, but it such a cool and new idea that they want to try it out anyway and have to find a way through development cost: sure, i'll buy it. As long as they tell me about this beforehand.

A triple AAA first person shooter made by a big studio adding ads post-release after i already bought the thing? yeah no.

I can respect your opinion I just think its really interesting just how much outrage this stuff generates.

In my opinion, as long as it doesn't actually affect the content of the game, I'm fine with it. The fact that its post-release doesn't bother me either, especially when you look at how short the collective attention span of the console market is.

Especially with such a huge million dollar selling release schedule is going to hit just in a few months, Deus Ex will be a whisper on the wind literally in a few weeks.

My final point is that as long as it doesn't touch the actual content, its fine by me.
 
Calcaneus said:
I haven't played this game, but is there more to the loading screens than just a splash image? If there isn't, than I don't think its the same as having an ad play while someone is driving during the movie. And I would be more pissed if Jensen was drinking a Coke and they blatantly focus the camera so that you can see the logo. I'd take a star wars thumbnail in a loading screen over that easily.

Guys, I'm not trying to defend this stuff, I just don't get where the hyperbolic comments are coming from. Really, you're gonna reconsider getting the sequel over this? To be fair, only one or two people went that far.

I would be pissed if they fucking zoomed in on the coke can. You can be subtle with this shit, make the world feel real, since Coke, McDonalds & shit are real. Just don't fucking sell it to me. I'm capable enough to understand when i'm being advertised to, and when it's appropriate to me. Don't make me pay up the ass, then put in some splashed ads later. Tell me up front my loading screen will have this shit, and I can make up my mind.
 
Calcaneus said:
Guys, I'm not trying to defend this stuff, I just don't get where the hyperbolic comments are coming from. Really, you're gonna reconsider getting the sequel over this? To be fair, only one or two people went that far.
Not having the choice is what upsets me here. If it was in day one I could've known about it and avoided this game like the plague.

That they already have my money and choose now to "slip this in" shows a serious lack of respect for their players. Its not going to change the world, but they've definitely lost me as a future customer.
 
This thread is embarrassing. You all have to be shitting me.

You're acting like entitled little fucking children.

Again, IT'S A LOADING SCREEN -- housing bullshit images and/or text that people don't give a fuck about or read FOR YEARS. Now they put a tiny ad on it and YOU FLIP YOUR SHIT? JESUS CHRIST. I'm done checking this thread.
 
Top Bottom