• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

Digital Foundry: Face-Off - Wolfenstein: The New Order

MoeB

Member
May 2, 2007
2,291
0
1,110
Playstation
Such an awful engine.


No 1920x1080 = no buy.

Another game to the list... it is increasing :(

 

Sinatar

Official GAF Bottom Feeder
Jun 7, 2004
36,859
0
1,745
Edmonton
DF said:
Despite asset parity, the level of anisotropic filtering is slightly higher on the consoles

Why do these guys even cover PC games at this point? No DF, the consoles don't have better then 16x AF you nitwits.
 

stryke

Member
Oct 1, 2011
10,922
1
760
Question.

When people say 'sub-HD', do they mean to say it is less than a full HD resolution, that it is less than 720p - the marketing minimum - or that it is less than SD?

Because to me, sub-HD could mean all of them. An SD signal is sub-HD, but so is 700p. That seems really bad terminology for measuring something.

sub-HD is anything less than 720p - that is 1280x720.
 

Moral Panic

Member
Jul 3, 2012
4,426
0
0
How does the dynamic framebuffer work anyway? How does the system know how long it will take to render the frame before it will render it? Or does it render one frame and then reduce for the next frames? But then wouldn't you see framespikes?
 

ethomaz

is mad because DF didn't do a video on a video of a video of a video on PS5
Mar 19, 2013
40,292
40,955
1,310
39
Brazil
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)
 

JaseC

gave away the keys to the kingdom.
Jul 30, 2009
73,799
7
1,030
Western Australia
Why do these guys even cover PC games at this point? No DF, the consoles don't have better then 16x AF you nitwits.

To be fair, officially speaking, the PC version only supports 4x AF. Higher values are only achievable through the console, which needs to be enabled with a launch argument, or config editing, plus the higher value has to be re-enabled upon every level load, so it isn't considered.
 

GribbleGrunger

Dreams in Digital
Oct 12, 2012
16,377
9,669
1,240
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

Yeah but there are some games that require great graphics for atmosphere and then there are games that are just 'fun'. I've seen lots of Youtube videos of this game and it looks a lot of fun.
 

Syrus

Banned
Jan 26, 2014
3,683
0
0
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

dude, its MOSTLY 1080p on both vonsoles. they only drop occasionally and usually not long enough to notice. Don't gimp yourself with the ps3 version. but it is your money.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
Oct 29, 2006
42,982
0
0
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

Wait, why are you buying versions that are even worse?

Like I said before, the PS4 version is pretty much 1920x1080 for the entirety of the game. One split second did it drop when a lot of dismemberment and explosions happened and another during a setpiece moment. That was it.
 

epmode

Member
Jun 7, 2004
28,470
0
0
Why do these guys even cover PC games at this point?

I've noticed that even though DF usually winds up saying that the PC version is the best, they seem to downplay some advantages of PC ports. Like, they'd include PC screens at 720p to compare with PS3/360 shots instead of getting involved with >1080p or supersampling.
 

VanWinkle

Member
Jul 8, 2011
27,804
2
575
West Virginia
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

Wait, are you seriously buying vastly inferior versions of games because of... principle?
 

Ridley327

Member
Feb 7, 2005
37,712
1
1,480
TMYK. Seems like a waste with an engine pipe that historically has brought in the licensing clams.

Wonder if they'll be using it for FO4. Gamebryo needs to die.

I'm pretty sure that Carmack mentioned at one point that idTech 5 was not a good fit for the scale of Bethesda's games. Rage was somewhat open-world, but it's a far more limited experience than the freedom you get with Fallout or TES.
 

Sinatar

Official GAF Bottom Feeder
Jun 7, 2004
36,859
0
1,745
Edmonton
To be fair, officially speaking, the PC version only supports 4x AF. Higher values are only achievable through the console, which needs to be enabled with a launch argument, or config editing, plus the higher value has to be re-enabled upon every level load, so it isn't considered.

Or have it set to 16x in the drivers, which anyone with a PC that is 10 years old or newer should do.
 

Kinyou

Member
Sep 12, 2009
48,126
3
975
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)
 

T.O.P

Banned
Jan 9, 2012
20,012
3
0
30
Italy
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)


holy shit lol
 

Jito

Banned
Jul 10, 2013
5,702
0
0
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

So you're going to buy the worst version possible instead of playing the good version because of some dynamic resolution used to maintain 60 fps? Lol people on this site, shit every day baffles me.
 

Deadbeat

Banned
Jun 7, 2010
8,533
0
0
Guns Capital
Ill rent the game one day. Sure as hell not buying it on PC (unless its 5 dollars or something). The article even comments on the PC issues.
 

ethomaz

is mad because DF didn't do a video on a video of a video of a video on PS5
Mar 19, 2013
40,292
40,955
1,310
39
Brazil
Wait, why are you buying versions that are even worse?
Because it is a console that is really worse... I want just the best on the better console.

That's my opinion and I understand the points and comments of everybody else.
 

GribbleGrunger

Dreams in Digital
Oct 12, 2012
16,377
9,669
1,240
Because it is a console that is really worse... I want just the best on the better console.

That's my opinion and I understand the points and comments of everybody else.

Come on ... you're just being stubborn. Give yourself a couple of days and then decide. You wouldn't want to cut off your nose to spite your face. I know you better than that.
 

Silky

Banned
Apr 6, 2013
20,310
0
0
Georgia, US
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

More power to you.

Sooo PS3/360 versions are locked 60? Not bad, IdTech.
 

omonimo

Banned
Jun 6, 2012
7,572
2
0
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

Good Lord. Maybe was better not buy ps4 at this point if you expected 1080p in all the multiplat.
 

Chobel

Member
Mar 26, 2013
15,673
3
515
It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

ethomaz must be joking, right?
 

Cygnus

Banned
Jan 30, 2014
1,093
0
0
Hyperbole much?

Rage looked phenomenal on my X360 and I can't wait to try out TNO on PS4.

I'll take a solid 60 FPS over resolution consistency absolutely any day of the week.

I mean on PC, it runs like crap for how it looks
 

iamvin22

Industry Verified
Jan 22, 2010
3,501
1,950
1,280
I'm not trolling guys.

It was a serious comment... I'm avoiding every non 1080p game from the new systems... I played BF4 on PS3 due this restriction and I will do the same with Watch Dogs.

Every non-1920x1080p game I will buy on old gen consoles.

I expect to not do that this gen but I was forced because the games are not reaching this level.

It is my money after all ;)

 

ethomaz

is mad because DF didn't do a video on a video of a video of a video on PS5
Mar 19, 2013
40,292
40,955
1,310
39
Brazil
ethomaz is going to end up buying a lot of shitty versions of good games.
I'm fine with that ;) I know I will miss games or play them in old platforms but it was my decision before the gen started.

Guys, just move on... I didn't know a simple opinion can cause so much buzz ;)
 

JaseC

gave away the keys to the kingdom.
Jul 30, 2009
73,799
7
1,030
Western Australia
Or have it set to 16x in the drivers, which anyone with a PC that is 10 years old or newer should do.

Sure, but that's beside the point. What I'm getting at is that higher AF values aren't factored in because they're not officially supported by the game and DF has always compared versions as they exist readily; config editing, driver-level improvements and mods have never played into these head-to-heads. You're getting mad at DF for something it's always done. ;) If you want enthusiast comparisons then that's what OTs and (where applicable) PC performance threads are for -- another way to put it would be that DF compares consumer products as they exist out of the box.
 

Alo81

Low Poly Gynecologist
Jun 24, 2012
13,139
1
710
steamcommunity.com
To be fair, officially speaking, the PC version only supports 4x AF. Higher values are only achievable through the console, which needs to be enabled with a launch argument, or config editing, plus the higher value has to be re-enabled upon every level load, so it isn't considered.

Alternatively, just force 16x AF through console and never worry about it again.

Because it is a console that is really worse... I want just the best on the better console.

That's my opinion and I understand the points and comments of everybody else.

I just wanna say I hope you reconsider this stance because as it stands, you're paying the same money for a worse product, even though you already bought the other (pretty expensive!) product that allows you to have the much better experience.
 

stack9902

Banned
Jan 24, 2014
114
0
0
Of course PS4 will be better-looking. But XB1 owner here saying Wolfenstein looks fantastic so far, in case anyone is worried about it just looking plain bad. Dat frame rate.




both versions look good to me, perhaps it's me, I watched the video a few times, and couldn't see any noticeable differences. perhaps its me.
 

RoadHazard

Member
Dec 9, 2008
20,140
2,896
1,245
Gothenburg, Sweden
I'm fine with that ;) I know I will miss games or play them in old platforms but it was my decision before the gen started.

But WHY? It just makes no sense that the PS4 version of a game not being completely optimal would make you prefer getting an even worse version. Really, no sense at all.
 

dan2026

Member
Jul 10, 2012
11,213
1
0
You guys are mad.

Give me dynamic resolution all day, every day for constant 60fps.

What do a few less pixels matter?
 

omonimo

Banned
Jun 6, 2012
7,572
2
0
Having now completed our analysis, it's clear that the PS4 gains an advantage with smaller drops in resolution that occur less frequently than they do on Xbox One. Metrics in the area of 1760x1080 are found on PS4, while on the Xbox One this can drop to an extreme of 960x1080 in some scenes.

There's no clear winner here
I mean, seriously?
 

Jito

Banned
Jul 10, 2013
5,702
0
0
I'm fine with that ;) I know I will miss games or play them in old platforms but it was my decision before the gen started.

Guys, just move on... I didn't know a simple opinion can cause so much buzz ;)

Might as well just buy a PC if you strive for 1080p everything.