My 9060XT is 322GB/sBecause people don't know much about this stuff. You can even ask our Ai overlords:
Only 32CU though, but that seems to fit well with Pro 576/60.
Some of the reflections in the street look a bit shit and worse IMO than non-RT, the reflections off the car body look horrible. Some look decent (one of the looking down in a puddle shots and car window reflection). The RT lighting plays a bigger part between on and off, I think.
My 9060XT is 322GB/s
Regular PS5 owners am cry, that sucks!
and Xbox obviously.
Pro version seems good for those playing there, looking forward to the PC vs PS5 pro. That path tracing looks legit next gen in 2026.
I mean you have to be limited by something but a well optimised PlayStation game is neither CPU limited, GPU limited, memory bandwidth limited and hits its fps target. It uses everything it can. People tend to paint incorrectly with broad strokes because they want something specific to complain about regarding the hardware and keep repeating until it becomes a narrative.
RT is responsible. Try force turning off RT in Starwars outlaws and you get similar results, it looks like the contrast is messed up but it's just the RT I believe.
Maybe contrast is fucked up because 120Hz switches to limited black level (4:2:2)? i Doubt RT alone is responsible.
You don't get how bottlenecks even work. Not all games in all scenarios will be bottleneck by GPU, CPU or memory BW. For example 1080p game is far less likely to be memory BW limited than 1440p game.
CPU performance in this game seems quite high so I doubt Pro is CPU limited:
And this is with RT on, without RT (like 120Hz mode on Pro) it should perform significantly better.
You're talking about someone who a few days ago claimed series x was winning comparisons against ps5 pro....full on delusion land there.
Hahaha, how pathetic.
You don't get how bottlenecks even work. Not all games in all scenarios will be bottleneck by GPU, CPU or memory BW. For example 1080p game is far less likely to be memory BW limited than 1440p game.
CPU performance in this game seems quite high so I doubt Pro is CPU limited:
And this is with RT on, without RT (like 120Hz mode on Pro) it should perform significantly better.
UE5 games are the worst case scenario for Pro. They don't use the biggest advantage Pro has - RDNA4 RT units.
It's unhinged how much you obsess over me.
Not sure about unhinged. More like, ooooh, look at me, I've got an expensive PC! Path-tracing init.
That's a 6 core CPU.
Not sure about unhinged. More like, ooooh, look at me, I've got an expensive PC! Path-tracing init.
Fascinating to see people's reactions to positive PlayStation news. You can't seem to cope with it.
You forgot other things. As PS5 doesn't use all of 8 cores. 3600x is vastly more game performant
My 9060XT is 322GB/s
Your obviously hurt by the ps5 pro performance.
I'm really not insecure. If I wanted an all singing and dancing PC I could get one believe me. What I wouldn't do though is go on about it constantly in a console comparison thread.
I mean there is plenty of examples of ray tracing on base consoles.
This exactly what RT does. 422 vs 444 is neglible.
Maybe contrast is fucked up because 120Hz switches to limited black level (4:2:2)? i Doubt RT alone is responsible.
Looks like a PS4 game with some added potato RT. UE5 games have features like nanite and non potato hardware RT.
That's Denshie in a nutshell.
Almost as if MS was giving vibes of "De-emphasise Xbox HW, push the PCMR angle"…
DenchDeckard
, you may not mean it but it seems like you follow MS PR marching orders at times 
.
I think that's PSSR2, and a video on it is the surprise John mentioned in the end of the video. It's "too good" to have been done by Capcom exclusively for the PS5 Pro. The difference is amazing. No issue with RT to point out at all? And not enough power on base consoles that they had to go with FSR1?
MS Reward points per post have hit all time lows since Spencer "retirement" and Bond dismissal.
