Discussion: The attempts to normalize child sexualization

Aug 24, 2016
1,843
561
345
#1
There seems to be an attempt to try and downplay/normalize children doing sexual acts out in the world, and of concern, also on this very board to a limited extent. My question is where do we draw the line? Some say that a kid dancing in a club for money at 11/12 years old is not the far end of the line, I think it's way past it. There shouldn't even be a line imo, there should be a cement wall. In no form should a child be doing any thing that is normally considered "sexual" when an adult does it. But people are coming up with more and more excuses, and now there are websites, blogs, and even media news is promoting it to a limited extent.

What do you think? Is there a line? Should children be allowed to be sexualized? Should children make their own decisions?

The fact this is now a discussion and a big debate in the media shows that the standards have gotten out of wack. Below is a more detailed post about my opinion on the issue, as well as wondering why the &(&* are the politicians and the Media not talking about the ridiculous surge in pro-child love groups, which "coincidentally" grew along with this sentiment that children doing sexual acts is "ok" and "normal" the last 4-5 years.

I couldn't help but notice a concerning trend not just in the world at large but even on this board to normalize or "blur the line" of child sexualization usually by excuses trying to make it more about "expression" or saying that certain groups do things differently and should be allowed. No questions should be asked by us.

For example, we have seen several children walking around near naked, dancing around sexually in several events whether progressive club events, LGBT events or others. Girls and boys a like from as young as 5, and it's common. So much so that recently there's been a thread on one Desmond Napoles, who not only has been on videos with "convicted killers for manslaughter" but who is also stripping at a club sexually and receiving money from suitors.

One comment that disturbed me was this by a user:

It seems like we're equating drag shows with stripping. I know gays are foreign to the lot of you, but performing in drag and having dollars thrown at you is par for the course. It shouldn't be too much to ask you to to do a cursory search on youtube to see what a drag show is. A man, or in this case a boy, dresses as a woman and comes out and lipsyncs to a song. Depending on how fierce she is, note she's presenting as female at the moment so we will address her as such, the crowd will shower coin, aka money, on her. Upon concluding her show, she will gather her coin, aka money, and exit the stage.

You, the general you, making this sexual is your hang up. We, the gays, are just happy to see a youngling getting to live her truth at an age where we, the gays, were somewhere huddled in the corner because you, the straights, called us all types of fags while we were trying to live our lives. If little sis wants to beat her face, wear a gown and perform the house down; we, her sistren, will celebrate her and show her the love no one showed us in the hopes that she'll grow up without feeling she's a mistake and hating herself.

The fact that you, the straights, would take words written on Milo Minneapolis' website as gospel in this situation; someone who has shown themselves to have his own issues regarding his sexuality and is complicit in the normalization to adult/child relationships speaks more on you than it does on this little boy (isn't that what they call confirmation bias?)

I give my little sis 10s across the board, and I pray that you, the straights, will someday seek to learn about someones culture before you, the straights, cast your hangups on them. Just because your brethren dress up your daughters like prostitutes doesn't mean we, the gays, sexualize our children in the same manner.
But while some did respond to this very strange reasoning, it's also not new. Even advocates for such groups believe that the line needs to be blurred. people like Cathy Smith, a lady who advocated for early sexualization as young as 8, a college professor, among many many many many others, believes it's time to let kids be unrestricted and decide what to do with their bodies and get the attention that some pro-child relationship sites says is "beneficial" to the child.

An example here: http://www.shfri.net/speak/
There is a substantial body of recent, historical, and cross cultural research and evidence to the effect that consensual sexually expressed boyhood relationships with older males (SEBROM) are generally innocuous, usually quite beneficial, and have been making positive contributions to humanity since before history began. But "victimologists," the media, law enforcement, and courts, have created a false image of even consensual SEBROM as traumatic to the boy, and as evil and criminal on the part of his older "boylover" friend. The purpose and plan of this website is to encourage those who subscribe to the philosophy of responsible boylove to participate in various online news fora and other discussion groups in a non-confrontational, civil, and constructive manner, in order to counter this victimological misinformation and to promote the understanding and acceptance of boy/older male relationships
This blurring of the lines for Childhood sexualization has been rapidly growing since 2014 though recent media developments have made it more public, it's been widespread with nothing done about it.

IMO, I think it's not a coincidence that pro-child relationship groups, individuals, sites, and other are popping up almost on correlation with the belief that it isn't "sexual" to sexualize a child. Usually under the pretext of it being a normal "progressive' or "LGBT" life-style.

We have had numerous pro-pedo organizations who are appearing at several of the events on the news and no ones talking about it, as well as a very odd push by many people to sexualize kids coming up with every excuse under the sun to try to make it seem unharmrful to the child and that it's normal. We've seen some of this kids around nearly naked men and women, that child is certainly being harmed.

NAMBLA
SULNEC
Proud Mothers
KIDProgress
BoyWiki
BOyHotline (Site to talk with someone in an emergency due to boy attraction)
IPCE
Shfri.net
SafeHaven Foundation
ElopeFoundation
ACTProtection agency
Virtuos Pedophiles

and several more, many of which are less than 3 years old, are now all over the place. What's going on? I'll tell you, as people keep trying to find excuses to normalize child sexualization, and making this idea kids can choose what to do and who to be in a relationship with, the pro-child relationship adovcancy groups and organizations are already setting up for the takeover.

Why no ones talking about this is baffling to me and is a major cause of concern for anyone who knows someone with kids, who cares for kids, who has kids, who has younger siblings or grandkids. This is something that needs to be addressed but no one (with a platform) is addressing it.
 
Last edited:

Arkage

Gold Member
Sep 25, 2012
2,105
807
540
#4
The fact this is now a discussion and a big debate in the media
In what media universe do you live in, because it's not mine. And I follow quite a lot of media, though admittedly I don't seek out fringe pedo websites in hopes of creating a narrative.

IMO, I think it's not a coincidence that pro-child relationship groups, individuals, sites, and other are popping up almost on correlation with the belief that it isn't "sexual" to sexualize a child. Usually under the pretext of it being a normal "progressive' or "LGBT" life-style.
Also, fucking lol. This is just a "gays and pedos are basically the same" argument. And considering how much conservatives have to gain from such a correlation it's incredibly easy for them to troll people via Poe's law.

Also nvm conservative Catholics and Muslims being the primarily propagators of systemic child molestation rings.

p.s. Your videogame threads are much more interesting than constantly tribalistic click bate garbage. Stick with games.
 
Last edited:
Dec 3, 2013
16,563
9,144
555
#5
A friend of mine recommended me the show Riverdale because she says it's so extra with all the drama that you just can't stop watching no matter how ridiculous it is.

So I gave it a watch, and every damn episode made me so uncomfortable as an older man. They're supposed to be sophomores in high school, and yet they have the slow dramatic electronic music that you would play when you're smashing a Tinder date. The "high school" girls are ripping off their shirts into their bras, grown men in their 20s (actors age) playing "high school kids" but with way chiseled adult male bodies and they proceed to have sex.

And it only gets a rating of TV-14 when every episode has sexually suggestive material in each one down to the initial act before the camera cuts.

This is the shit 13 year old girls on average are watching on CW? WTF!

I haven't watched Cable in over 10 years, but it seems like it's getting more and more excessive than what it ever used to be. Same thing happens on Netflix movies/shows with the same rating and the same age groups.

Example, a show called The Innocents on Netflix. I decided to watch it because the premise sounded interesting yet the girl is supposed to be 15 and there is even a more graphic sex scene that lasted way too long.

WTF Hollywood.
 
Last edited:
Jan 26, 2009
5,737
220
670
37
#6
The world is pretty fucked. When I was a kid we knew all our neighbors and communities meant something. Do you know all your neighbors? I went next door to introduce ourself when new neighbors moved in and welcome them. They basically ran inside and didn’t answer door when we walked to their property. Weird world we live in.
 
Oct 1, 2006
2,699
2,067
1,090
#8
In what world is the media trying to normalize this? What media are you watching?


Also lol at the transparent as fuck mentioning of the LGBTQ community while talking about this. The stereotype of gay people being more likely to be pedophiles is archaic and outdated. It's not even remotely true.
It is not that LGBTQ people are more likely to be pedophiles. It is that those who promote pedophilia as a sexuality rather than a paraphilia are using the zeitgeist of sexual libertarianism, and growing acceptance of the LGBTQ community, as a Trojan horse.

Like that topic with the creeps throwing money at a 10-year old kid doing a burlesque show - those people are using the LGBTQ community as a shield.
 
Oct 24, 2017
5,702
4,408
335
#12
ok here is my opinion...

First of all in real live. In Germany the age of consent is 14 and it is something totally normal here for girls having a 18-20 or even 23 year old friend. They are getting accepted and then also can be better controlled as if you try to forbid it and then she is doing this anyway. This has probably also something to do with the fact that many guys are not "mature" enough at their same age. I personally think it is a good approach unlike in America in which you can get on a sex offender list when you have sex with a 17 year old while being 18..

As for sexualization: I think in real life you can not tell girls what they are allowed to wear and what not. And this also can be very sexualized as long they feel comfortable with it. In Media it is of course a bit different. Back in my days I remember some sex symbols like Kurnikova and Alizee which were both I think 15-16. And of course this was also used by corporations and their managers to make them more popular. Also I think there should be room for underage nudity in movies AS long it is part of he story they want to tell. Example: Der Vorleser in which a 45 year old women who worked at a concentration camp fell in love with a 14 year old boy. Also of course you had something like Lolita with Dominique Swain who was at the time 15 years old as well. These kind of stories need to told as well. I also remember this new "swedish"? Movie in which a 15 year old trans person was standing naked in front of a mirror. And of course we are not talking about hardcore or even full nudity. But of course this should never be forced.

As for fictional: I honestly see no restrictions here. I also believe that pedophile people have something to fantasize in media the actual act of sexual crimes will go down. Because they have a valve to get rid of their pressure. And there are countless studies who show these observations as well.
 
Last edited:
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#13
ok here is my opinion...

First of all in real live. In Germany the age of consent is 14 and it is something totally normal here for girls having a 18-20 or even 23 year old friend. They are getting accepted and then also can be better controlled as if you try to forbid it and then she is doing this anyway. This has probably also something to do with the fact that many guys are not "mature" enough at their same age. I personally think it is a good approach unlike in America in which you can get on a sex offender list when you have sex with a 17 year old while being 18..

As for sexualization: I think in real life you can not tell girls what they are allowed to wear and what not. And this also can be very sexualized as long they feel comfortable with it. In Media it is of course a bit different. Back in my days I remember some sex symbols like Kurnikova and Alizee which were both I think 15-16. And of course this was also used by corporations and their managers to make them more popular. Also I think there should be room for underage nudity in movies AS long it is part of he story they want to tell. Example: Der Vorleser in which a 45 year old women who worked at a concentration camp fell in love with a 14 year old boy. Also of course you had something like Lolita with Dominique Swain who was at the time 15 years old as well. These kind of stories need to told as well. I also remember this new "swedish"? Movie in which a 15 year old trans person was standing naked in front of a mirror. And of course we are not talking about hardcore or even full nudity. But of course this should never be forced.

As for fictional: I honestly see no restrictions here. I also believe that pedophile people have something to fantasize in media the actual act of sexual crimes will go down. Because they have a valve to get rid of their pressure. And there are countless studies who show these observations as well.
Oh shit Alizee, I haven’t thought about that chick in years. How old was she in that famous video?

 
Dec 18, 2013
1,164
778
420
#15
There is no world where children should be sexualized ever.

However we do live in one that promotes sexuality to children. I remember being disgusted when my daughter was young and seeing a Bratz commercial promoting the club life and one of the Bratz was like, “We party every night”

I also remember seeing stuff on Family Channel, like Suite Life where these young kids were “dating” and having to talk to my daughter in grade 3 about how boys won’t be the same in a few years, so it’s better to hold off.

I don’t think something like Big Mouth is sexualizing kids, as it’s just exaggerating the pubescent life many of us go through. If it wasn’t so gross I’d let my kids watch it, as lessons to them. Unfortunately Nick Kroll takes it a bit too far in places, which is fine by me, I found it funny, but it makes it something they can’t watch because of some of it.
 
Feb 2, 2017
731
415
245
#16
Japan has more to answer to then anyone else.

I dont see the problem with how its done mainly in the west as long as parents are their to act as a guide and filter out the unwanted. But the shit i see coming from Japan is the real threat.
 
Last edited:
Oct 24, 2017
5,702
4,408
335
#18
Japan has more to answer to then anyone else.

I dont see the problem with how its done mainly in the west as long as parents are their to act as a guide and filter out the unwanted. But the shit i see coming from Japan is the real threat.
Japan has some really questionable stuff for sure like 4-6 year old idol DVD's etc which are or at least were easily purchasable and which shows these kids in bikinis. As for fictional and porn stuff. Japan is also huge in this fantasy stuff but this porn stuff is done by 18 year old actresses who look like children. Which in the end I think is fine because it is fiction.

Everything involving real children I will of course agree with you, But through new laws this has also quite changed a bit in the last couple of years
 
Likes: OSC
Mar 7, 2018
184
116
205
#20
It seems to me that sexuality is being pushed into society, and I mean in a overt sense, in these times. Where I'm from, there's a big problem with underage girls getting pregnant and having lots of kids. This is nothing new, but there seems to be a normalization of this culture via, for instance, reggaeton.

As for sexuality being pushed in general, and I mean overt sexuality, it could be a way to degrade society and make it easier to control by corporations and such. I have no problem with covert sexuality (for and by adults). Overt sexuality however is a big problem since it gets easily out of control.
 
May 17, 2012
5,079
832
455
Canada
#21
Why do the same hucksters have to come into these threads and not discuss the issue at hand and claim grievances against marginalized groups? They never, not once actually comment on the fucking topic at hand just virtue signal while looking like they are stanning for pedophiles under the guise that you are attacking some marginalized group. Every pedo thread here has multiple people doing this. I can stomach your bad opinions on everything else in life except when you put blinders on for ideology sake when dealing with children. Children should never be sexualized, not in beauty pageants, not drag kids dancing in clubs, never.
 
Jun 5, 2011
6,698
581
550
#22
There seems to be an attempt to try and downplay/normalize children doing sexual acts
No there is not. This is in your head because you spend too much time on Internet forums fighting imaginary fights. Get out into the real world. Children were married off at 13 not too long ago, these days kids are kids much longer and insulated from working, driving, sex, paying bills for much longer in first world countries.

But continue on, search the net for stories that feed your fears and play into the confirmation bias you enjoy.
 
Aug 10, 2012
2,038
466
430
Reading, Berkshire
#23
You guys would be shocked at just how paedo friendly many political groups are. Example in the US child marriage in a gray area and many politicians don't bother going after it because they don't want to upset the numerous small rural communities that practice it in the various ways they do.

And since vast majority of citizens don't care there's no real reason to crack down or update laws, there's no pressure to do so
 
Last edited:

Redneckerz

Those long posts don't cover that red neck boy
Jun 25, 2018
2,420
1,925
395
Unknown Body, Proxima Centauri, 4th O.B.
#24
What we should do is teach kids some moral values again. What does not help is the rise of music videos from artists being awfully underdressed, which, as kids tend to do, want to copy off.

The overwhelming presence of porn a click away also does not help. Kids think the acts done there are what is natural, when love making and porn are vastly different things.

Oversexualization in general has always made me uncomfortable...and it is extremely upsetting to me when children are exposed to such things. :messenger_pensive:
Pretty much this. I remember a Ciara track with Justin Timberlake where Ciara is awfully playing it cool. Hell, its called Love Sex Magic.

At the same time i wouldn't want kids to be shied away from sex. Exploration of sex (as in love making, not porn) is an experience that every kid should walk into on its own.

There seems to be an attempt to try and downplay/normalize children doing sexual acts out in the world, and of concern, also on this very board to a limited extent.
Please show me some posts that entertain this idea. Else its simply a blind accusation on a topic where we all have to tread lightly.

Oh shit Alizee, I haven’t thought about that chick in years. How old was she in that famous video?

This is exactly why the cum closet exists.

I would have been banned elsewhere for making that comment.

But seriously, just look at that. Half sailor top/bottoms that show enough a$$ to get the hormones flowing. And then the dance.

I mean, its the woman's ultimate weapon, but to pre-teens and upcoming puberty, this is literally comparable to a red flag on bulls.

That being said, Alizee was fit AF back then. Remembrances of Top of the Pops come to mind.
 
Likes: Ailynn
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#25
What we should do is teach kids some moral values again. What does not help is the rise of music videos from artists being awfully underdressed, which, as kids tend to do, want to copy off.

The overwhelming presence of porn a click away also does not help. Kids think the acts done there are what is natural, when love making and porn are vastly different things.


Pretty much this. I remember a Ciara track with Justin Timberlake where Ciara is awfully playing it cool. Hell, its called Love Sex Magic.

At the same time i wouldn't want kids to be shied away from sex. Exploration of sex (as in love making, not porn) is an experience that every kid should walk into on its own.


Please show me some posts that entertain this idea. Else its simply a blind accusation on a topic where we all have to tread lightly.


This is exactly why the cum closet exists.

I would have been banned elsewhere for making that comment.

But seriously, just look at that. Half sailor top/bottoms that show enough a$$ to get the hormones flowing. And then the dance.

I mean, its the woman's ultimate weapon, but to pre-teens and upcoming puberty, this is literally comparable to a red flag on bulls.

That being said, Alizee was fit AF back then. Remembrances of Top of the Pops come to mind.
Wait, did you just admit to being cum closet guy?
 
Likes: slugbahr
Jan 9, 2018
1,547
1,739
255
#26
  • brap

    brap

A friend of mine recommended me the show Riverdale because she says it's so extra with all the drama that you just can't stop watching no matter how ridiculous it is.

So I gave it a watch, and every damn episode made me so uncomfortable as an older man. They're supposed to be sophomores in high school, and yet they have the slow dramatic electronic music that you would play when you're smashing a Tinder date. The "high school" girls are ripping off their shirts into their bras, grown men in their 20s (actors age) playing "high school kids" but with way chiseled adult male bodies and they proceed to have sex.

And it only gets a rating of TV-14 when every episode has sexually suggestive material in each one down to the initial act before the camera cuts.

This is the shit 13 year old girls on average are watching on CW? WTF!

I haven't watched Cable in over 10 years, but it seems like it's getting more and more excessive than what it ever used to be. Same thing happens on Netflix movies/shows with the same rating and the same age groups.

Example, a show called The Innocents on Netflix. I decided to watch it because the premise sounded interesting yet the girl is supposed to be 15 and there is even a more graphic sex scene that lasted way too long.

WTF Hollywood.
That's why I don't watch teen dramas anymore. They used to be about a bunch of stupid overly melodramatic bullshit now it's just about all the characters fucking each other and cheating on each other.
 
Likes: DeepEnigma
Sep 5, 2018
100
143
220
Ireland
#27
Also, fucking lol. This is just a "gays and pedos are basically the same" argument. And considering how much conservatives have to gain from such a correlation it's incredibly easy for them to troll people via
I am a very left leaning liberal democrat. I am also LGBT. So we can dismiss that assumption right there.

While I do think the OP is over-estimating the frequency of this problem and the number of people supporting it, the fact that it occurs at all is a problem. And it does. It absolutely is a thing amongst some gay and queer communities, as it is being heavily ignored / glossed over because reason. There are kids being exploitrd by these people, and there is evidence out there to show it.

Your blind dismissal is no better than his blind assumptions.
 
Last edited:
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#28
I am a very left leaning liberal democrat. I am also LGBT. So we can dismiss that assumption right there.

While I do think the OP is over-estimating the frequency of this problem and the number of people supporting it, the fact that it occurs at all is a problem. And it does. it absolutely is a thing amongst some gay and queer communities, as it is being heavily ignored / glossed over because reason. There are kids being exploitrd by these people, and there is evidence out there to show it.

Your blind dismissal is no better than his blind assumptions.
The operative word was some, but I suspect others may take you out of context.
 
Sep 5, 2018
100
143
220
Ireland
#29
The operative word was some, but I suspect others may take you out of context.
Its frequent enough to be problematic.

It wasn't like this a decade ago, but recent ideological pushes have made it so that the worst elements of any group have begun to think that the world owns acceptance and validation. As a result, it has become trendy in many gay and queer communities for people to just flaunt their sexuality in front of people all the time. Including children. Which isn't acceptable, whatever your orientation.

What I think is actually happening here is that people with paedophiliac leanings are making a concerted effort to try and blend into the wider LGBT communities to protect themselves, by using "victimisation" as a shield against criticism.

I will say this though. I have seen enough at this point that I believe that RuPaul is running, or at the very least enabling, a child exploitation racket.
 
Last edited:
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#30
Its frequent enough to be problematic.

It wasn't like this a decade ago, but recent ideology pushes have made it so that the worst elements of any group think that the world owns that acceptance. As a result, it has become trendy in many gay and queer communities for people to just flaunt their sexuality in front of people all the time. Including children. Which isn't acceptable, whatever your orientation.

What I think is actually happening here is that people with paedophiliac leanings are making a concerted effort to try and blend into the wider LGBT communities to protect themselves, by using "victimisation" as a shield against criticism.

I will say this though. I have seen enough at this point that I believe that RuPaul is running, or at the very least enabling, a child exploitation racket.
The bolded is 100% what I think is happening too.
 
Likes: Ailynn
Jan 31, 2018
1,398
349
250
#34
At the same time i wouldn't want kids to be shied away from sex. Exploration of sex (as in love making, not porn) is an experience that every kid should walk into on its own.
Kids aren’t sent to war or given licenses to drive cars or fly planes for a reason let alone could they raise a child if they were to have one at a young age. WHAT IS THIS, RED?
 

Cybrwzrd

Anime waifu panty shots are basically the same thing as paintings of the french baroque masters, if you think about it.
Sep 29, 2014
3,551
3,212
460
#35
The first season from what I remember had a bit of sexualization such as the first episode with Morty's day dream, the prom and the girl dating a Birdman and explicitly saying that she preform sexual acts with him. I'm pretty sure they're all 14.
Morty is a teenager. When I was 14 having sex was well, a life goal, and was probably 90% of what my thoughts were about on a daily basis. Cracking jokes about that it in a comedy is wrong now?

Also I think Tammy was in Summer's class, she also turned out to be some sort of spy working for the galatic government that murdered Birdperson during their wedding....
 
Last edited:
Oct 24, 2017
5,702
4,408
335
#36
Kids aren’t sent to war or given licenses to drive cars or fly planes for a reason let alone could they raise a child if they were to have one at a young age. WHAT IS THIS, RED?
That is when sex education come into play it is much more successful to teach them how to prevent pregnancy than trying to tell them they are not allowed to have sex.
 
Likes: Cybrwzrd
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#38
Kids aren’t sent to war or given licenses to drive cars or fly planes for a reason let alone could they raise a child if they were to have one at a young age. WHAT IS THIS, RED?
I think he’s trying to say that you teach them about it so that they understand it and are prepared for it when the time comes, not that you encourage them to engage in it as early as possible. Think, my friend. Break the conditioning.
 
Jan 31, 2018
1,398
349
250
#39
Nah. He said the exploration of sex. Kids aren’t thinking about sex. We may check out eachothers hardware a bit but then we move on. No ones trying to fit puzzle pieces together unless they’ve seen something. For all we know at that age, kissing leads to babies.
 
Last edited:

Cybrwzrd

Anime waifu panty shots are basically the same thing as paintings of the french baroque masters, if you think about it.
Sep 29, 2014
3,551
3,212
460
#41
Again, how is a child going to care for a child? There’s a reason why things are ordered the way that they are.
Once the plumbing starts to function they aren’t children anymore. That doesn’t mean they are game for adults to pursue, but it does mean that they are adolescents. They need proper education and preparation to become an adult at that age. That includes sex ed. And that is why we have words to describe that age group.

We have extended childhood through young adulthood these days, and that is in my opinion part of why we have so many fragile snowflakes entering and exiting higher education these days.

No, a 15 year old shouldn’t be having children, but acting like they are 5 year old children and sheltering them from the reality of their biology is far more dangerous than teaching them about it. They are going to start having sex soon. I lost my virginity at 16 with a 15 year old, and I wasn’t her first. We knew to be careful and use protection tho, because we had education.

Trust me, I knew tab p fit into slot v well before that. That drive kicks on as soon as you get your first morning wood.
 
Last edited:
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#42
Once the plumbing starts to function they aren’t children anymore. That doesn’t mean they are game for adults to pursue, but it does mean that they are adolescents. They need proper education and preparation to become an adult at that age. That includes sex ed. And that is why we have words to describe that age group.

We have extended childhood through young adulthood these days, and that is in my opinion part of why we have so many fragile snowflakes entering and exiting high education these days.

No, a 15 year old shouldn’t be having children, but acting like they are 5 year old children and sheltering them from the reality of their biology is far more dangerous than teaching them about it. They are going to start having sex soon. I lost my virginity at 16 with a 15 year old, and I wasn’t her first. We knew to be careful and use protection tho, because we had education.

Trust me, I knew tab p fit into slot v well before that. That drive kicks on as soon as you get your first morning wood.
If you look anything like Burt Reynolds, I'm surprised you didn't lose it younger.
 
Nov 3, 2018
134
91
170
Canada
#44
Morty is a teenager. When I was 14 having sex was well, a life goal, and was probably 90% of what my thoughts were about on a daily basis. Cracking jokes about that it in a comedy is wrong now?

Also I think Tammy was in Summer's class, she also turned out to be some sort of spy working for the galatic government that murdered Birdperson during their wedding....
I mean, they still had him grope a girls breasts (granted it was a daydream) and also shake her ass at him at the prom. I personally have little problem them joking about it and such because its a cartoon, but there is some sexualization of underaged characters that can be argued wasn't needed.

However, if Tammy is indeed a fair bit older then I fail to see why Rick & Morty would be included here as well. I don't remember anything beyond season one being sexual outside maybe the occasional masturbation joke or something.
 

Cybrwzrd

Anime waifu panty shots are basically the same thing as paintings of the french baroque masters, if you think about it.
Sep 29, 2014
3,551
3,212
460
#46
Yeah as soon as 🍝 is flowing from a pre teens conch, the first thing she’s thinking about is sex. Nah. Let alone the hormones going out of control making her an emotional wreck. NOPE ALL AROUND.
If pasta is coming out of that I would hope she is thinking about seeing a doctor or telling her parents before anything.
 

Cybrwzrd

Anime waifu panty shots are basically the same thing as paintings of the french baroque masters, if you think about it.
Sep 29, 2014
3,551
3,212
460
#47
I mean, they still had him grope a girls breasts (granted it was a daydream) and also shake her ass at him at the prom. I personally have little problem them joking about it and such because its a cartoon, but there is some sexualization of underaged characters that can be argued wasn't needed.
So we can't joke about how teenage boys dream about sex 30 hours a day now? Hell, I'm a 37 year old man now, and I think about it 29 hours a day now, only because my stamina isn't what it was when I was a teenager.
 
Likes: hariseldon
Jan 31, 2018
1,398
349
250
#48
The “pasta sauce” is literally nature telling her she’s ready. What do you think the hormones are for?
😂😂😂😂😂dude, NO IT DOESNT. Physically ready? Perhaps. Mentally? Emotionally? SPIRITUALLY? Sex isn’t something to be toyed with. That’s why everyone is so screwed up now. Giving children access to orgasms at an early age is no different than giving them access to cocaine. I was able to produce sperm at 13. So you’re saying I was ready to start wiving someone up at that point? What does anyone know about the world as a pre teen?
 
Apr 25, 2009
6,338
6,258
805
Australia
#49
😂😂😂😂😂dude, NO IT DOESNT. Physically ready? Perhaps. Mentally? Emotionally? SPIRITUALLY? Sex isn’t something to be toyed with. That’s why everyone is so screwed up now. Giving children access to orgasms at an early age is no different than giving them access to cocaine. I was able to produce sperm at 13. So you’re saying I was ready to start wiving someone up at that point? What does anyone know about the world as a pre teen?
Nature gives no fucks about your emotions, bro
 

Cybrwzrd

Anime waifu panty shots are basically the same thing as paintings of the french baroque masters, if you think about it.
Sep 29, 2014
3,551
3,212
460
#50
😂😂😂😂😂dude, NO IT DOESNT. Physically ready? Perhaps. Mentally? Emotionally? SPIRITUALLY? Sex isn’t something to be toyed with. That’s why everyone is so screwed up now. Giving children access to orgasms at an early age is no different than giving them access to cocaine. I was able to produce sperm at 13. So you’re saying I was ready to start wiving someone up at that point? What does anyone know about the world as a pre teen?
Thirteen is preteen?
 
Likes: matt404au