Impeccable
Member
Aβydoς;126457706 said:This.
I'm still waiting for the games tho.
Yeah, games are solely lacking.
Aβydoς;126457706 said:This.
I'm still waiting for the games tho.
If you have a gaming PC it's even worse. Drive club and TLOU are the only things worth getting this year.Yeah, games are solely lacking.
If you have a gaming PC it's even worse. Drive club and TLOU are the only things worth getting this year.
And if you don't like cars or teenage drama games with zombies that leaves you with nothing.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/lewisdv...r-contributor-payment-plan-yes-we-pay-people/
So some are paid so what? How do you know Erik Kain is paid? Even if he is paid, he is a "freelance" journalist. Forbes doesn't even endorse the opinion of their bloggers:
"The author is a Forbes contributor. The opinions expressed are those of the writer."
My "dumbass" point remains - the article was not the opinion of Forbes, and people should understand that Forbes is not the Forbes of 10 years ago. It was the opinion of a blogger that they shell a few bucks to and elevate to "contributor." Whoopedy-doo.
If you have a gaming PC it's even worse. Drive club and TLOU are the only things worth getting this year.
If you have a gaming PC it's even worse. Drive club and TLOU are the only things worth getting this year.
Drive Club has a lot of bad rap behind it, so many delays.
Better to release a bad game on time than to release a good game at a later date then.
Drive Club has a lot of bad rap behind it, so many delays.
I've been saying this, but Sony is doing well off the backs of their branding and fandom and nothing more. That's fine from a business end, but as a consumer I just expect to have something new in a product and not a slight enhancement (in terms of features) from their last iteration. The PS brand is essentially Apple at this point with the diehard support it receives while having done very little to deserve it.
Say whatever you want about how MS goes about their business, but the Xbox One is a more interesting console, same with the Wii U. We should support companies that at least attempt to give us a new experience rather than praise the ones that simply reiterates the old. It's really baffling to me how the same people who will constantly shout about it being "all about the games" will support a console that has objectively the weakest lineup. I think that contradiction from a vocal minority is influencing how consumers at large think about video games and it's not right to me.
So by all means, compare Forbes articles by contributors and compare it to anything else out there, and then explain to me why it matters? And if you truly understand how far Forbes has supposedly fallen, then point it out, cause I read Fobes for financial news and they do a great job, and the best writers are the contributers, sans a very select few.
You cant(well you can, but I could claim anything I wanted too regardless of it being true) just claim the article means less because of contributors unless you actually have proof(or atleast some evidence) this is the case. Or do you think the people at IGN have more integrity over there, because they are on staff vs being hand picked by the staff? So yes, your dumbass point remains, that he is a contributor, but pointing that out on its own means absolutely nothing. All it does is make it sound like a drive by shit post, because you dont actually wana talk about what is in his article.
I'm happy with it, that's all that matters to me
Facts:
1. There are thousands of 'hand picked' contributors on forbes.com as per wikiipedia.
2. These contributors are paid per audience size with scaling rewards for sticky month to month readers as per forbes.com policy.
3. This marketing machine called Erik Kain, (and, I'm sure many other of these wonderful bloggers on Forbes.com you love so much) never has any PRIMARY source of information i.e. unique news or information that he gathered himself directly from the source in question. He simply pulls quotes from livestreams, and press releases, and OTHER people's interviews and fills the rest of his posts with frankly pretty mediocre 'analysis' and 'opinion.' Because that's all he can do. He is not out there talking to people in the industry and producing real news and opinion - he is sitting at home in his boxers blogging on a laptop.
My dumbass opinion:
1. The vast majority of these contributors write simply to increase their hitcounts and are paid to do so. They should not be considered journalists, and their writing should not be considered anything other than a form of self marketing or an extension of their own little personal enterprise.
2. If this qualifies as financial "news" for you then have at it - I prefer to read actual news and form my own opinions and analyses. I'm sure one in a thousand of these contributors actually has an interesting opinion or unique analysis to offer but the vast majority write worthless crap.
I don't understand what is so disagreeable about this article.