XXL
Member
FFVII Rebirth system requirements:
Minimum Requirements: PS5
Recommended Requirements: PS5 Pro
This is amazing. Well done.
FFVII Rebirth system requirements:
Minimum Requirements: PS5
Recommended Requirements: PS5 Pro
Better image quality at 60fps on Pro vs 30fps on peasant console. He thinks it's due to PSSR.
Still more simple than PC.FFVII Rebirth system requirements:
Minimum Requirements: PS5
Recommended Requirements: PS5 Pro
Crow incoming fast. Tgs around the corner.
Cool, enljoy playing it…again. I’m sure you can pick a different ending, right?I played it in performance mode on PS5, but there was a steep sacrafice in fidelity to do so.
But I'll 100% be playing it again on the Pro. It will look phenomenal even just running in PS5 fidelity mode but at 60fps.
Edit: it's better than fidelity mode.
Not sure if this is satire.Cool, enljoy playing it…again. I’m sure you can pick a different ending, right?
In the meantime I will play BG3…again.
What does this have to do with this thread?Cool, enljoy playing it…again. I’m sure you can pick a different ending, right?
In the meantime I will play BG3…again.
Seriously, I played in quality mode and it's one of the best-looking games I've ever played. What planet is he living on?
And saying it to me it hilarious. It's making me want to go play it. Lol.What does this have to do with this thread?
Hold the lineAs a Sony fan I feel like we just found the last Dragon Ball.
We gotta tout this PSSR boys!
Which is why it's optional. As most people also don't dish out for expensive PC GPUs.
If you have held off for 8 months to play rebirth on pro then your most likely not a ff fan. Cmon guys stop forcing it, most people aren't going to fork out this ludicrous price for a small upgrade in graphics.its not justified imo.
It's the 60fps mode that he's talking about looks like shit. And it now looks better than the 30fps mode at 60.
Nothing bizarre about it. It would looks awful in comparison to what it offers now.Just 6 months later and now one of the biggest releases of the year looks 'too awful'. Very bizarre.
Nothing bizarre about it. It would looks awful in comparison to what it offers now.
I think it still had some IQ issues, I can't remember (I didn't buy it).That's really not much better. Quality mode was "okay?" Compared to what?
Itself? Quality mode was 30fps, this is looking better than that at 60fps.That's really not much better. Quality mode was "okay?" Compared to what?
in performance mode? It was awful. I had to play it in Quality mode to avoid the blurry image.Image quality was "too awful?"
Please get fucked with this hyperbole
Optional for everyone and I like new toys
If you have held off for 8 months to play rebirth on pro then your most likely not a ff fan. Cmon guys stop forcing it, most people aren't going to fork out this ludicrous price for a small upgrade in graphics.its not justified imo.
When the next big game launches that looks better on PS5 Pro at 60fps than it does on PS5 at 30(like Rebirth) you will start to see the holdouts sweat.Hold the line
Dude, he said it "was okay" as in when it came out, not compared to a system that hasn't come out. And he said "it was okay...but it was 30 fps," which means he thought it was okay outside of it being 30 FPS.Itself? Quality mode was 30fps, this is looking better than that at 60fps.
Dude, he said it was "okay" as in when it came out, not compared to a system that hasn't come out. And he said "it was okay...but it was 30 fps," which means he thought it was okay outside of it being 30 FPS.
Sony wanted the sticker shock to sink in before they started showing why we will cause the queue system on PS Direct and sell this thing outWhen the next big game launches that looks better on PS5 Pro at 60fps than it does on PS5 at 30(like Rebirth) you will start to see the holdouts sweat.
Hell, they are sweating right now.
$700 is for the PS4 Pro Pro Pro (PS5 Pro Game Boost) which is entering the 4th half of its run actually. This is what we call the victory lap phase.I'm fine with waiting for the PC version. I have no reason to buy a Pro. Sony has been drip feeding AAA releases this gen, so why spend $700 on Pro version of a system that's entering the 2nd half of it's run?
All depends who’s writing the check each week.Remember DF is a biased source, like the other thread said
Depends more on who is making the statements but thats also just human natureAll depends who’s writing the check each week.
Most of us realize it's a scam, but some of us say things like "this game couldn't be done on PS4" and "it looks like shit on base PS5" and that's because people are out there to trick others in to believing it. Corporations want to PC-ify the console industry by telling us expensive power is the only way to have nice looking games. They are using the extreme fans to do their bidding by trying to convince us to purchase such outrageous things, or be "paupers" and the like.So instead of optimizing their games so they don't look like a blurry mess in the performance mode they'll just tell you to upgrade to an 800€ model.
imagine if John says he likes and Alex says he doesn't. What would be the "Digital Foundry says...." headline?Depends more on who is making the statements but thats also just human nature
Cool. Can this guy give me $700?
Watch all of us who are saying that “buying the European Pro is unethical” and that “we have to give Sony a lesson”, post +1.000€ complete Pro plus game pictures before 2025.Real talk. It’s shit like this that’s going to wear me down and eventually make me to buy the Pro.
Good thing it's not a $700+ upgrade for the majority buying it then. €300 upgrade for me and with the early results so far that's already worth it.Isn't this exactly what Cerny said it would be? Just like the PS4 Pro was what he said it would be, a way to play PS4 games at higher res on 4K TVs.
Whether or not that is enough for people to spend $700+ on, is up to them.
They were mad as a company they knew how head to head matchups were going to go for the next couple of yearsFrom "Do we really need a PS5 Pro?" to this.
True. They are biased only when I don't like what they say.Even if they are biased, they aren't 100% of the time.
They are always biased with every topic .... oh wait ...Remember DF is a biased source, like the other thread said
Leadbetter punching the air right now.They were mad as a company they knew how head to head matchups were going to go for the next couple of years
This makes John the gamer happy though