Shogmaster
Member
Nostromo said:Don't need to invite me, I'm nAo and I don't agree with your post,in fact for what is worth you got nao32 completely wrong, lol :lol
That's it, NAO32. :lol Sorry I got that wrong, but I did say "something like.
But seriously, beside getting the name wrong, rest should be OK. You went ahead with NAO32 because FP64 (16bits per channel) was not a good performance option, right?
Now keep in mind, I'm not saying that Xenos' FP32 (10/10/10/2) is necessarily better than your solution. I'm just saying that it's better than a generic Integer HDR.