The scriptures left no matter what the church are based on Catholicism.
I didn't quite get your meaning, but I assume you meant that it doesn't matter whether or not it is a part of the catholic canon, no?
There are many different biblical canons in christiandom. This is because not all books are considered legitimate for a variety of different reasons (ex. Protestants don't have 1 + 2 macabees, judith, tobit, baruch, sirach, and wisdom) because of the fact they were not of the original hebrew. While there is some debate on correct canon, most christians have a consensus on certain core books. Would it be possible if you could show me stuff about a flat earth that everyone agrees is valid?
I am also open to reading other books outside of my faith's canon, but that does not mean I will trust or recognize it. Just because something is written does not mean I should accept it. For example, there is an infamous gnostic gospel called the gospel of thomas full of supposed sayings of Christ. In one passage Christ as a child seeks retribution for something done against him and turns another child to stone. The authenticity of the book is questionable and the content doesn't make sense contextually. Simply put, there are some fake books out there that are more akin to fan-fiction (however, I do not know if enoch would fit underneath this)
I don’t call myself Christian anymore as the messiah wasn’t Christian.
Christ was a jew, and so were many early Christians. However, Christians believe that Christ established a church and fufilled the old law of the old covenant to make a new one. So why would it matter if Christ Himself wasn't a christian?
He and the disciples were actually called the natsarim.
????????
When they were called Christians in Antioch it was derogatory.
Christian basically means "follower of Christ" and I am sure it was used derogatorially by people who hated them. I'm not sure what is your point though.
The book of Esdras which was left in the Catholic canon should give you an answer in regards to books.
I've read Ezra and I've never seen anything about biblical canon within it or specifically within the bible itself. I looked it up and apparently there are many parts of Ezra (sometimes called Esdras like you use) and what they are refered to by different people and how it is divided up as or even if it is in confuses me to be honest. I'm even not sure if your passage is in my bible.
Anyway, to get to the meat of the matter, the earth is round. There are many different ways to prove it that several gaffers have pointed out already so I'm not going to repeat. All scientific evidence points to the earth being a sphere. Also, while scripture is important, it only really relates to matters of faith. It has nothing to do with science and shouldn't be treated as a solution to querys on natural phenomenon. I don't believe the books were made with that in mind. I also question the authenticity of your books that claim the earth is flat, and if they are indeed authentic I still don't see it as proof for a flat earth.