-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
FRAGILE (Wii) new screens
- Thread starter king zell
- Start date
He's talking about image quality in the non-bullshots, not character design. And I agree. The designs are amazing (and yes, somewhat similar to ES which is unsurprising considering the developer). The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game. Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.PolyGone said:
flintstryker
Banned
but Eternal Sonata looks like a dreamcast game so...PolyGone said:Really? The character close ups look closer to Eternal Sonata to me.
ShockingAlberto
Member
The only "wish it were ported" talk you can't get banned for.Durante said:
straydog1980
Banned
RobertM said:
:HURL:
that's usually a safe bet, though with a slower pace and flashlight-directed camera i think this could be workable. we haven't heard too much about how the fighting engine works yet.Cedille said:
it's sad that after a decade of 3d games we still can't get flawless cameras. lack of a second analog on wii is often an issue, but i think the pointer might be a good fit for this game.
Phife Dawg
Member
Dunno, IQ looks better than a mediocre PS2 game to me. Oh and every game should've been on PC of course, for better technical realization.Durante said:
titiklabingapat
Member
Fuck me, this thing still happens.Durante said:
There always has to be a graphical debate in every Wii thread. It's like a rule or something.
And it almost always contains these claims:
1. "Graphics rock!"
2. "Graphics suck!"
3. "Looks like a PS2 title."
4. "Should've been on an HD console."
It's incredible formulaic and gets real old after awhile.
And it almost always contains these claims:
1. "Graphics rock!"
2. "Graphics suck!"
3. "Looks like a PS2 title."
4. "Should've been on an HD console."
It's incredible formulaic and gets real old after awhile.
goldenticket
Member
fresquito said:
it really is. this year has kinda been meh to me but 2009 is going to be pretty awesome
PantherLotus
Professional Schmuck
hey! not horrible!
Artofwar420
Member
Apart from the resolution and the antialiasing, and the higher res textures...
I mean, this game looks good. Period. Not just for a Wii game.
I mean, this game looks good. Period. Not just for a Wii game.
This is the first I've heard of this game, and it's really sparked my interest. For those who don't know that it's about Wikipedia have a rough outline of the plot, characters, etc.
Seriously hope this comes out in the UK.
Seriously hope this comes out in the UK.
I wasn't aware that the Wii could render at 800x600...Phife Dawg said:Dunno, IQ looks better than a mediocre PS2 game to me. Oh and every game should've been on PC of course, for better technical realization.
My comment was based on this shot...
That shot is 640x480 (Wii resolution) and is the only shot with a full HUD present. I'd say that accurately portrays what we will see on the Wii itself. The game is quite lovely, but the actual IMAGE QUALITY seems rather poor.
Phife Dawg
Member
That shot is definetly old though. I'm not saying this game has shown incredible IQ yet, but I still stand by my opinion that it is nowhere near a mediocre PS2 game (and yes, that includes your shot).dark10x said:
Can you not read? I'm not suggesting that the game looks like a mediocre PS2 game, I'm saying that the image quality reminds me of an older PS2 game. You can have fantastic assets on screen with lousy image quality, you know. I don't think the age of the shots have anything to do with that either.Phife Dawg said:
Phife Dawg
Member
Give me a freaking break. You're the one with the reading comprehension problem, I didn't even quote your post :lol. I posted in response to the guy who said "The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game." I disagreed and still stand by that.dark10x said:
Phife Dawg
Member
As you have pointed out yourself, you didn't claim the IQ looked like a mediocre PS2 game. I don't think that was a clarification of what you posted.dark10x said:
Regardless, I said that I stand by my point (that the IQ does not look like from a mediocre PS2 game) even in the light of the shot you have posted.
Why do you keep dodging the fact that you posted a bullshot? Why not just go back, edit your post, apologize for presenting a fraudulent argument, and then continue trying to justify your stance?Phife Dawg said:
Also, dark10x did, in a roundabout way, call the image quality mediocre, because any game released in 2009 with the image quality of a 2002-3 game (early-mid PS2) would be mediocre by the standards of late-PS2 games.
Black-Wind
Member
beef3483 said:
Soooo fucking true . . . sad really. Hell, I could name a Wii game for each and everyone of those claims.
I will take on (1) cause Im loving the art direction hear and the way it's done. Makes me effing hope that Nintendo makes the new Wii LoZ have a more bright and colorful art direction than TP (Not WW, just "more bright/ colorful/ cartoony. WW was too simple)
Day 1 for me
Zoramon089
Banned
Durante said:
Not this shit again...
Endless
Member
Cygnus X-1
Member
I like it. But actually, I'd like to see more different backgrounds.
I don't know why, but Game Watch hasn't posted all of the new screens. Here are some more screens. But in the end, it's just more of the same.
Nevertheless: I dig the style and the setting of Fragile a lot! I think it's awesome.
Nevertheless: I dig the style and the setting of Fragile a lot! I think it's awesome.
Black-Wind
Member
It's gone from "Wii has no good games!" to "I don't want Wii to have good games Im interested in!". Sad . . .thats been the feel for the past few days.Vdragoon said:
Anyway, this game still hasn't been confirmed to come stateside yet?