What exactly do they have to prove? Other than being slow, they have delivered a pretty good if not excellent mutiplayer free to play halo, and an excellent single player halo thats true to the games roots and scores an average 87.I agree it very well could be fine, but 343 has a lot to prove and no, folks are not overreacting, in my opinion.
it's 2022 and the game is on life support. nobody is gonna care in 3 years.
Can I get a link to the debunk?
What "Halo API guy"?
Yeah I would say he would know they are not doing any more single player content and are focusing on micro transactions for the multiplayer only.
Who is halo api guy? Link plz.
What is clown is your sad need to come swinging for Microsoft every time something critical is said about it.
No sales numbers.
Unverified.
It also dropped the majority of its online players.You may be on to something. Everyone knows December is a terrible month for game sales. And barely any games get sold on Steam.
/s
2nd only behind COD and outsold the holiday Pokémon releases. Top seller on PC in the US across all stores.
All this despite being a Gamepass title and Campaign only.
What exactly do they have to prove? Other than being slow, they have delivered a pretty good if not excellent mutiplayer free to play halo, and an excellent single player halo thats true to the games roots and scores an average 87.
Let’s not act like he hasn’t been wrong on other news too. Like Xbox Live being discontinued.
So yeah, he gets some stuff right, and some stuff wrong, and has made stuff up for the lolz too. The initial point was about reliability.
Well MS has Sea of Thieves and that's a live service title that has delivered regular updates. Games like Grounded has been updated numerous times as well over the years. There is clearly a precedent of MS support of live service titles in the past.They have to prove they can deliver on this 10 year "live service" having never done this before. Being slow when you've already established a set period of time to deliver isn't a good thing.
To be fair, there's nothing to debunk. The onus isn't on developers to respond to random youtube insiders, unless it starts getting reported wider by more reputable sources.
We shouldn't have an expectation for a publisher or developer to comment on everything that gets posted on r/gamingleaks.
Well MS has Sea of Thieves and that's a live service title that has delivered regular updates. Games like Grounded has been updated numerous times as well over the years. There is clearly a precedent of MS support of live service titles in the past.
Absolutely, you should question and investigate any source.If we can question Grubb when he has scooped others on big news we can absolutely question Reddit right?
Still struggling with this I see. You still have no numbers.You may be on to something. Everyone knows December is a terrible month for game sales. And barely any games get sold on Steam.
/s
2nd only behind COD and outsold the holiday Pokémon releases. Top seller on PC in the US across all stores.
All this despite being a Gamepass title and Campaign only.
It also dropped the majority of its online players.
343 shit the bed and needs to go.
Still struggling with this I see. You still have no numbers.
As for referencing Steam charts with the sales you usually get there...
So you're saying I was wrongto do so (which I was).Valid point. Also nothing to do with what my post was addressing.
I agree 343i is struggling at the moment and will need some serious intervention to resolve the issues they’re having putting out content for Infinite. Hopefully they’ll learn something from the lukewarm reception to Season 1.
From your post history, you’ve had zero issues citing NPD position and data as an indication of sales success when it’s suited your arguments
And not just NPD either. This was you using PSN chart position as an indication of sales success of Days Gone.
It’s not best practice to continue to dig when you’re in a hole.
So you're saying I was wrongto do so (which I was).
And therefore admitting you're wrong too (well done).
We got there in the end . Halo has no sales numbers, and multiplayer has tanked since December. It's up to 343i to turn it around, bit I don't think they will. Time for someone else (i.d.) to take on the franchise.
Btw jeez how long did you spend searching my post history (July 2020!) to find something so weak rather than admitting reality. You've definitely got too much time on your hands
A Free multiplayer games where almost 80% people have left. I played around 3 weeks but people are right about lack of maps, contents and activity selection.What exactly do they have to prove? Other than being slow, they have delivered a pretty good if not excellent mutiplayer free to play halo, and an excellent single player halo thats true to the games roots and scores an average 87.
Completely agree in case of Halo. Those 20-40% players are still playing MP even with its shortcomings (also COD and BF both underperformed massively so that helped), liked the Campaign and would be 100% back whenever new Halo content is out.Lots of people will care, a fun game is a fun game.
The Coalition is the best thing nobody is talking about.That's too far away. 343 while having produced a good game are an unoptimal solution for the franchise. Them as well as their game engine's ability to he efficient. I wish The Coalition would have been given the Halo franchise with Stanton leading and utilizing UE4.
But a full New game would take them 8 years. This dev is terrible.That can't be true,
Might as well make a new game at that point.
So you're saying I was wrongto do so (which I was).
And therefore admitting you're wrong too (well done).
Btw jeez how long did you spend searching my post history (July 2020!) to find something so weak rather than admitting reality. You've definitely got too much time on your hands
Are you really surprised at the lengths a sad warrior will go?
That's too far away. 343 while having produced a good game are an unoptimal solution for the franchise. Them as well as their game engine's ability to he efficient. I wish The Coalition would have been given the Halo franchise with Stanton leading and utilizing UE4.
Actually we don't know how well Days Gone sold, the numbers that came from Jeff Ross have been debunked.You weren’t wrong then. Days Gone sold well, and using chart position on the PSN revenues chart to infer sales health is perfectly apt.
Consistency is key.
20 seconds, actually. GAF’s search function is really robust. You should try it sometime.
I will say I was surprised to see you condemn factual information from NPD and Steam
That's what we do here. We disappoint.
I checked, and I cannot believe it took 4 pages for someone to post this gif. I'm not angry GAF, just disappointed.