• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Holy crap, Zardoz is a REALLY weird movie

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boogiepop

Member
Okay, so I had been vaguely aware of the existence of this movie, just enough to know that it was some form of Sci-fi, and that it starred Sean Connery dressed like this:
56-54188-zardoz-1381951021.jpg


Anyway, I sat down with some friends to watch the film for the first time last night, and I was expecting some oddness from that imagery, but... that really is almost a footnote in the strangeness of the movie. I was expecting some sort of James Bond-ish camp film, but what I got was an incredibly weird movie centered around the idea of immortality and death and yeah, sexuality and violence as well. And to be honest... I actually kind of liked it. Like, I'm not sure it truly coalesces into a solid point that builds on its themes, but for a movie that looks like it had no budget, it... actually does a pretty good job with its imagery, and it really does capture a bizarre alien feel of differentness, which I'd say it was actually aiming for.

I wouldn't say it's a great film or anything, but if you're into the unusual, I feel like it's definitely worth a look, instead of writing it off as "that movie staring a scantily clad Sean Connery" like I did for so long.
 
"The Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the Gun shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill! Zardoz has spoken."

That's not weird, that's America.
 
First time I heard of it was on "How did this get made". I saw it because it made no sense hearing about it on the Podcast and I thought they were not doing a great job of describing it. But nope. This move is unbelievably weird.

So much WTF packed into one film.
 
The end sequence of Zardoz was amazing. The rest of the movie was amazing in... other ways.

And the fucking twist with the title of the movie oh my god I laughed so hard.
 
John Boorman confirms in the commentary track that he was high throughout most of the filming.

I kinda love it too. It's a really flawed movie but the ideas in it are so outlandish and the imagery is so surreal that it ends sorta working in creating this post-apocalyptic world.

Its trailer is one of my favorites.
 
Still haven't seen it despite being a huge John Boorman fan thanks to Excalibur and The Emerald Forest. In my old age, I don't have a lot of patience for slow-paced movies anymore and I tend to lose interest very easily. Is Zardoz still worth seeing? Is it entertaining / interesting enough throughout the entire fim?
 
Yup. Zardoz is something alright. I saw it years ago on CH4. It must be twenty five years and I still remember it.

It's pretty brutal in some ways, reminds me of a Clockwork Orange.
 
Yup. Zardoz is something alright. I saw it years ago on CH4. It must be twenty five years and I still remember it.

It's pretty brutal in some ways, reminds me of a Clockwork Orange.

I think I had a similar experience with a BBC2 showing. All I can remember is something about breasts. Maybe "they" were trying to reconfigure Connery in some way. I was very young.
 
Okay, so I had been vaguely aware of the existence of this movie, just enough to know that it was some form of Sci-fi, and that it starred Sean Connery dressed like this:
56-54188-zardoz-1381951021.jpg


Anyway, I sat down with some friends to watch the film for the first time last night, and I was expecting some oddness from that imagery, but... that really is almost a footnote in the strangeness of the movie. I was expecting some sort of James Bond-ish camp film, but what I got was an incredibly weird movie centered around the idea of immortality and death and yeah, sexuality and violence as well. And to be honest... I actually kind of liked it. Like, I'm not sure it truly coalesces into a solid point that builds on its themes, but for a movie that looks like it had no budget, it... actually does a pretty good job with its imagery, and it really does capture a bizarre alien feel of differentness, which I'd say it was actually aiming for.

I wouldn't say it's a great film or anything, but if you're into the unusual, I feel like it's definitely worth a look, instead of writing it off as "that movie staring a scantily clad Sean Connery" like I did for so long.

Came in here to see if anyone had posted THAT picture of Sean, OP had it covered from 1st post, well only just covered....
 
As a purveyor of the weird and b-grade surprised I never got around to seeing this, this may have pushed me over the line into hunting it down.

Love Bill Hader's impression of Boorman trying to sell him on the movie. Sounded like quite the character.
 
It's shocking to see that picture of Sean Connery because I'm so used to every shirtless dude in a movie being buff and having a shaved chest.
 
This explains a lot.

How the hell they were able to afford Sean Connery - and put him in that ridiculous costume - still baffles me.

Funny enough, they got Connery for a relative pittance. He already had a reputation of being difficult to work with thanks to Bond, which was why he didn't get that much big film work in the 70s.

I unironically adore this film. Yes, it's clear that it had way more ideas than budget, but damn it if Boorman doesn't plow ahead like he had the money anyway.
 
Why did Burt Reynolds agree to this? Or is that Sean Connery?

OMG.. IT IS.

I think it's a pretty good movie, that is not ironically just to be clear, and it was directed by the guy coming off Deliverance which was a big hit so I don't see why he wouldn't. Actors back then were much less uptight about participating in weird shit, I'd imagine that had more to do with less productions going around than actually a change in the way actors look at work.
 
If you think a giant flying head vomiting guns onto an army of rapists to maintain an erotic telepathic aristocracy is weird, then honestly OP I feel sorry for you.
 
Zardoz is almost certainly the worst movie I have ever seen. I don't watch lots of movies, but I have seen some that are often considered awful, including Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, Ishtar, Waterworld, and my previous choice for worst movie I have seen, Ice Pirates, but this movie was SO MUCH WORSE than any of those! Zardoz is terrible, in its plot, writing, acting, everything. Yes, it's incredibly weird, but way too often it's weird in a bad way. Is it entertainingly bad, though? Well, maybe. It sure was something, at least, but I'd probably be better off if I'd never seen it.
 
Zardoz is almost certainly the worst movie I have ever seen. I don't watch lots of movies, but I have seen some that are often considered awful, including Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, Ishtar, Waterworld, and my previous choice for worst movie I have seen, Ice Pirates, but this movie was SO MUCH WORSE than any of those! Zardoz is terrible, in its plot, writing, acting, everything. Yes, it's incredibly weird, but way too often it's weird in a bad way. Is it entertainingly bad, though? Well, maybe. It sure was something, at least, but I'd probably be better off if I'd never seen it.

"You have been raised up from Brutality, to kill the Brutals who multiply, and are legion. To this end, Zardoz your God gave you the gift of the Gun. The Gun is good!"

zardoz-3-o.gif
 
Sean Connery is the guy who said he didn't understand Lord of the Rings. But he made this movie. And League of extraordinary shit. Makes sense.
 
I love Boorman, such an interesting director. Not saying that Zardoz and Exorcist 2: The Heretic aren't weird and utterly alienating to their expected audience, but I think both are better than they are generally regarded to be.

Either way, the man made Point Blank, Deliverance, and Excalibur, so he's entitled to wig out once in a while and make some crazy shit.
 
I love Boorman, such an interesting director. Not saying that Zardoz and Exorcist 2: The Heretic aren't weird and utterly alienating to their expected audience, but I think both are better than they are generally regarded to be.

Either way, the man made Point Blank, Deliverance, and Excalibur, so he's entitled to wig out once in a while and make some crazy shit.

Nah, Exorcist II: The Heretic is regarded right where it needs to be. Boorman came into that with such an improper attitude for what a project like that needed that it was doomed to be what it was right from the jump.
 
Nah, Exorcist II: The Heretic is regarded right where it needs to be. Boorman came into that with such an improper attitude for what a project like that needed that it was doomed to be what it was right from the jump.

I wouldn't say that, i think its an unusual, flawed movie with lots of good ideas and a few brilliant scenes. Its just the polar opposite of Friedkin's original stylistically.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom