[
That's only a projection.
Everybody has one.
The facts are: Apple is dying right now. And it's because of the things they did, and not because of some projections that are yet to come.
"And it's because of something they did"
This is not a fact. This is your best guess. Because it could have been something that they
didn't do... like adapt. Which is my best guess, or projection, for why Sony's taking the steps they are...
Adapt to what exactly?
What is changing/changed right now that needs adaptation?
If you aren't going to follow what I'm saying, whether you can't or don't want to understand, I'm not going to let you run me in circles.
One last time. The market, not just in gaming, could be moving towards more of a cross-platform software future if the majority of people are
starting to expect or demand it. Smart companies prepare for possible market trends. Especially if they see a long term benefit. Perhaps they are looking at the profit margins of the big AAA multiplatform game makers like EA and ACTIVISION etc. Perhaps there is a model there they want to follow that will allow them to cut costs while maximizing profits. Perhaps they just want to be prepared while testing the waters so they don't get caught with their pants down if the market does move that direction. But if it doesn't, then they'll be ok. Or they could simply just not want to be bottled in by their hardware and like many others have done just want to branch out to reach more of the world. I don't know. I'm making a guess as to why they are doing... what they
are doing... Which is opening up... Which looks a whole lot like what MS is doing, granted, at a slower pace.
The truth is we can't know exactly why unless they tell us. All we can do is support it or not. I for one plan on buying quite a few of their games as soon as they release in order to support this, just like I did MS.
So, you are implying that Steam won and Sony and MSFT need to "adapt" to a new ruler? Or what?
I don't see a coherent picture from you on why selling on Steam is a good strategy.
Steam won? A new ruler? I was giving you the benefit of the doubt before, but you just went down in my fanboy list. Shame.
The market. or consumer trends if you will, didn't let MS successfully launch their games on their own store. Part of it was due to a terrible storefront that just wasn't ready and games as apps leading to a terrible experience for many... But most of it is just because of how the market is in the PC space.
So, MS stubbornly, yet wisely made the decision to launch their games on Steam along side their store to give consumers a choice while they get their act together. This way, they don't put backs up against the wall, they garner good faith, and they still get tons of sales due to the amazing reach of Steam.
No, obviously, but it needs to sell a sizable amount that justifies the motions taken.
What motions taken? How do you even know how much Sony needs to make up for? How on earth do you know what would be good or acceptable to them in terms of sales for their first party games that come to PC? You don't know what their internal roadmap looks like or what they would deem a success. Lots of companies expect to take losses or at the very least a slow climb when trying to break into new markets. But if anyone can do it quickly, it's Sony with their awesome first party games. As long as the ports are good.