• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

How do people fall for dumb "detox" and "cleanse" shit?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Burbank_

Member
Jan 28, 2013
121
0
310
Lund
Fruits and fruit juices have existed since dawn of mankind but we didn't have obesity epidemics until recently.



Ah, you're talking about industrialized fruit juice! That crap is indeed as bad as soda, if not worse because they need more preservatives to make it last longer and make up for the lack of carbonate.



This "everything has chemicals!" defense is getting annoying. Lead is just a chemical, right?

Don't natural fruit juices contain ≈ as much sugar as soda? They will make you fat on the same level as candy or coke, and fuel sugar addiction. They would have done that 5000 BC as well, it doesn't really matter for how long they have been around.
 

Orbis Tabula

Member
Aug 20, 2010
15,615
1
0
This "everything has chemicals!" defense is getting annoying. Lead is just a chemical, right?

I don't think anyone is trying to claim chemicals=good always. Instead, they're arguing against chemicals=bad always. Those aren't the same thing, so I don't see the problem with that argument.
 

Social

Member
May 15, 2010
4,427
36
800
I fast on regular bases, 2 days a werk and I don't use any magical vitamins or water. My body also thanks me and everything also works much better and that's just because I eat much less.

People should just stop eating so much and so late.

I mostly eat until 7PM on days when I eat, works great to keep things under control.
 

Rapstah

Member
Jul 20, 2009
13,183
0
0
This "everything has chemicals!" defense is getting annoying. Lead is just a chemical, right?

Well, uh, everything in the universe except light and forms of energy is just a chemical compound if you're going to go that route. Not sure how that proves that the ones that appear in fruits and vegetables are less dangerous than what we create.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
Feb 10, 2008
20,293
0
0
Fruits and fruit juices have existed since dawn of mankind but we didn't have obesity epidemics until recently.



Ah, you're talking about industrialized fruit juice! That crap is indeed as bad as soda, if not worse because they need more preservatives to make it last longer and make up for the lack of carbonate.



This "everything has chemicals!" defense is getting annoying. Lead is just a chemical, right?

You can't use anecdotal evidence from before we were even alive as a juice defense. If you're drinking cups of juice, you're consuming significant amounts of calories and sugar, agree or disagree?


And no one in the entire world has ever said "all chemicals are good" but tons, a few in this thread even, have implied that chemicals are bad. "Preservatives" for example.

Am i reading posters defending GMO food in this thread or wrongly interpreting it that way?

If you have any opinions on GMOs, I'd love for someone to start a thread about it who wasn't me for once.
 

FallingEdge

Member
Mar 24, 2010
24,134
6
0
People see them as such. Why not just eat something rich in protein instead? Same with the detox crap, why not eat fruits instead? I'm pretty sure the placebo effect is stronger if it's something you can drink, most likely because it reminds people of magic potions.

Beacuse it is an easy way to get 50g of protein at any time. Has nothing to do with magic potions lol.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
May 21, 2006
17,232
4
0
Fruits and fruit juices have existed since dawn of mankind but we didn't have obesity epidemics until recently.

Saying that something is not a good, healthy, nutritional choice for you does not mean it is the sole and only cause of the obesity issues we face today. Food portion sizes, excessive sugar, sedentary lifestyles, it all contributes. I'm not a nutrition expert. But even a very basic knowledge of very very very simple nutritional principles tells you what you need to know about fruit juice. If you understand the role of insulin and sugar in the body, you understand glycemic indexes, and you understand fibre's role, you see why fruit juice is troublesome.

Ah, you're talking about industrialized fruit juice! That crap is indeed as bad as soda, if not worse because they need more preservatives to make it last longer and make up for the lack of carbonate.

What preservatives does fruit juice have and what are their impacts on the human body? You're doing the "it has bad chemicals" thing again.

This "everything has chemicals!" defense is getting annoying. Lead is just a chemical, right?

But your argument here supports the "everything has chemicals" defence; the presence of chemicals is not a problem. Lead isn't bad for you because it's a chemical, lead is bad for you because lead itself is bad for you. You can't simply say something is bad because it has chemicals, you need to identify chemicals that have known negative impacts on human beings. Is there lead in diet soda?
 

P44

Member
Sep 21, 2012
1,763
0
0
This "everything has chemicals!" defense is getting annoying. Lead is just a chemical, right?

Exactly.

Something being a chemical does not indicate if it's good or bad. So you may as well stop making the argument to begin with.
 
Dec 24, 2010
3,350
0
770
31
Mount Pleasant, MI.
twitter.com
There isn't a human alive who doesn't eat food, so I fail to see what you are getting at. Additionally, the burden of proof for a defense is to support the benefits, not the lack of a negative.

That is not how you frame an argument.
Except there's nothing to defend as you haven't even mentioned what these negatives are, never mind proving that they exist to begin with. Can't defend anything if you've let to make an actual argument yourself. If you want an argument, then make an actual claim beyond just GMOs are bad (okay, but how? What's wrong with them? What are these negatives that the positives don't outweigh? In what way exactly are they harmful and why shouldn't their use be continued?) and provide something to be refuted instead of expecting the other side to do your work for you
 

CornBurrito

Member
Dec 1, 2009
29,551
0
845
Yes because there is no scientific proof that the benefits outweigh the negatives.

GMOs have been extensively tested. Also artifical selection is also like a form of genetic modification.

There is no proof that the Internet doesn't have significant long term effects on human mental health BTW.
 

kn0wsk1lls

Member
Mar 31, 2012
264
2
570
.

can someone make me a mother pumper avatar?
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
Feb 10, 2008
20,293
0
0
There isn't a human alive who doesn't eat food, so I fail to see what you are getting at. Additionally, the burden of proof for a defense is to support the benefits, not the lack of a negative.

That is not how you frame an argument.

Yes, and it's beneficial to eat food. If there are no negatives, and food is a positive, and GMOs are food, GMOs are a positive. I can't frame the argument any other way because there isn't any negative aspect of GMO you've presented me. If you want to get into specifics, I can tell you about the agricultural benefits of some GMOs, or the health benefits of others. Ie, draught resistant crops or nutritionally supplemented crops.
 

CornBurrito

Member
Dec 1, 2009
29,551
0
845
Yes, and it's beneficial to eat food. If there are no negatives, and food is a positive, and GMOs are food, GMOs are a positive. I can't frame the argument any other way because there isn't any negative aspect of GMO you've presented me. If you want to get into specifics, I can tell you about the agricultural benefits of some GMOs, or the health benefits of others. Ie, draught resistant crops or nutritionally supplemented crops.

IIRC there is some research that suggests the pesticides used in conjunction with some GMO crops are harmful to humans. Though so are pesticides used for non GMO crops, and not every GMO crop is made specifically to produce or be resistant to a specifically designed pesticide.
 

GreatestHits

Member
Jun 30, 2013
3,605
6
525
DFW, Texas
Yes, and it's beneficial to eat food. If there are no negatives, and food is a positive, and GMOs are food, GMOs are a positive. I can't frame the argument any other way because there isn't any negative aspect of GMO you've presented me. If you want to get into specifics, I can tell you about the agricultural benefits of some GMOs, or the health benefits of others. Ie, draught resistant crops or nutritionally supplemented crops.


we went from how stupid people are for falling for piss pass schemes and now we're defending GMO's.

Today:

Booted up GAF.

Clicked on Thread: How do people fall for dumb "detox" and "cleanse" shit? (because I have relevant experience)

Read Thread to reasonable place (FP)

Read last comment by Kinitari

Log out, stay away from GAF for a while
 

FreezeSSC

Member
Jun 6, 2008
1,072
0
0
we went from how stupid people are for falling for piss pass schemes and now we're defending GMO's.

Today:

Booted up GAF.

Clicked on Thread: How do people fall for dumb "detox" and "cleanse" shit? (because I have relevant experience)

Read Thread to reasonable place (FP)

Read last comment by CornBurrito

Log out, stay away from GAF for a while

Sorry, but if you think gmo is bad for you I suggest you read peer reviewed scientific journals on the topic.
 

Horseticuffs

Full werewolf off the buckle
Jan 28, 2011
7,885
2
940
Well, I must say I am surprised there are so many people on GAF who believe in detoxes, are anti-GMO, and think fruit juice is good for you.

Man, can I get some of the Gaf you've been having? Mine came with an extra helping of weird batshit.
 

LUFTRAUSER

Banned
Jun 21, 2014
4,814
0
0
Probably for the same reason people think GMOs are bad. The irony is that many so-called liberals laugh at ignorant conservatives who refuse to acknowledge the reality of global warming, and then turn right around and claim GMOs are dangerous.
 

Orbis Tabula

Member
Aug 20, 2010
15,615
1
0
No evidence of a negative does is not indicative that a negative does not exist. I do not have proof that my local mexican restaurant has a rodent problem but it is possible.

Yeah, but it would be weird if a friend wanted to go there and you refused because there was no proof that there weren't rodents. Even weirder if you said "The food is good, but not good enough to outweigh the negatives of the rodents that they can't prove aren't there."
 

a916

Member
Jul 10, 2013
8,419
0
435
People see them as such. Why not just eat something rich in protein instead? Same with the detox crap, why not eat fruits instead? I'm pretty sure the placebo effect is stronger if it's something you can drink, most likely because it reminds people of magic potions.

Eh, it's a lot easier to drink a protein shake instead of eating 8 or so chicken breasts. It's only meant to supplement your diet. Maybe you're a vegetarian and you can't get many sources of just clean protein? If you're not getting enough already, hence the word supplement.

It's not a magic potion like say steroids.
 

zaxon

Member
Jul 30, 2011
332
0
0
I don't know why this stuff bothers people. At worst it does no harm while providing a refreshing beverage with some modicum of beneficial nutrients. It doesn't hurt the people doing it and it doesn't hurt you, so why the fuss? It's not like this is some great scam perpetrated by the lemon lobby; it's simply people with an interest in their health partaking in speculative methods to improve it.

If you want "dumb shit people fall for" to complain about, look to all the people who blindly swallow every anti-depressant, statin, or proton pump inhibitor their doctors shill onto them. "Instead of diagnosing and treating the cause of my symptoms, you're going to give me a drug that directly interferes with the basic functioning of my vital organs, all so I just wont notice my symptoms anymore? Sure, sign me up!"
 

SamVimes

Member
Jun 21, 2010
5,847
1
0
Not every mental issue can be traced to some trauma that can be fixed by some strong words and a big hug.
 

spootime

Member
Jul 27, 2007
1,982
374
1,075
"Natural" and "toxins" are such effective marketing buzzwords its not really surprising that a lot of people fall for stuff like this. You can slap "chemicals" on pretty much anything and imply that it causes cancer


Probably for the same reason people think GMOs are bad. The irony is that many so-called liberals laugh at ignorant conservatives who refuse to acknowledge the reality of global warming, and then turn right around and claim GMOs are dangerous.

This makes me laugh too.

I don't know why this stuff bothers people. At worst it does no harm while providing a refreshing beverage with some modicum of beneficial nutrients. It doesn't hurt the people doing it and it doesn't hurt you, so why the fuss? It's not like this is some great scam perpetrated by the lemon lobby; it's simply people with an interest in their health partaking in speculative methods to improve it.

If you want "dumb shit people fall for" to complain about, look to all the people who blindly swallow every anti-depressant, statin, or proton pump inhibitor their doctors shill onto them. "Instead of diagnosing and treating the cause of my symptoms, you're going to give me a drug that directly interferes with the basic functioning of my vital organs, all so I just wont notice my symptoms anymore? Sure, sign me up!"

The two scenarios are actually kind of similar. A lot of detox "diets" and stuff are really targeted towards quick weight loss. Instead of trying to treat the symptoms of obesity by adopting a well balanced diet, people try magical detox lemonade binges to try to melt the fat or cleanse the toxins that are "ruining their metabolisms"
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
Feb 10, 2008
20,293
0
0
No evidence of a negative does is not indicative that a negative does not exist. I do not have proof that my local mexican restaurant has a rodent problem but it is possible.

The lack of documented problems isn't a guarantee for safety; particulalty when companies fight to avoid disclosing what is in our food and what pesticides, in of itself not a gmo, is used to harvest gmo crops.

You understand why this sort of thought process is a problem though, right? Everything in our lives are now things that are untrustworthy because, even though they may not have evidence of negatives, they could have negatives that we know nothing about.

We don't operate this way, for good reason - I doubt you operate that way as well in your every day life, and you for some reason put an unreasonable burden on GMOs. I really suggest you look into -what- GMOs are, what the process of making GMOs entails and how it compares to regular breeding and evolution. It really will help to highlight why the GMO scare is -very- misplaced.
 

GungHo

Single-handedly caused Exxon-Mobil to sue FOX, start World War 3
Jun 4, 2009
8,196
0
990
I feel like I'm reading Jaden Smith quotes.
 

SeanR1221

Member
Jul 16, 2008
17,969
4
900
This scam has made it through a lot of mommies in my area



Basically, you eat an extreme calorie deficit and take caffeine pills and whey shakes.

All for like 300.00/month

They call it a nutritional rebalance
 

V_Arnold

Member
Dec 5, 2008
15,304
0
950
Hungary
Ok, I'm out.

You guys win. I'm going to eat a diet soda and cheeseburger for dinner tonight, fuck having a fresh strawberry and banana smoothie, shit gives you cancer.

And who needs to put a lemon in fresh water? Are they crazy? Let's just rock some pepsi!

BI

See? you just subscribed the pseudoscience of "shit, diet soda is the devil".
Also, equating fucking diet soda with eating cheesburger "for dinner tonight".

I have just eaten a delicious low-sodium chickpea soup tonight, and I am going to drink diet coke for that. I would fuck myself up for no reason if I were to drink orange juice instead. I do not need that 15-20g sugar in my water per 250ml bottle. Or potentially more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.