EightBitNate
Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 11,061
- 39
- 820
Ok, so that other thread stirred enough discussion for me to want to create a new thread. I've read other opinions on this and the issue appears to be divided. Can someone explain to me why the Pokemon games are so well-received?
I have a couple gripes with a couple of the games' aspects.
Granted, the gameplay of the games is solid. The system is really well done and it makes for a cute RPG. However, it's been done over and over and over... The argument for this is usually about tweaking the stats of the Pokemon and the effectiveness of different types, but honestly, almost nothing has been done that evolves and benefits the games substantially. It has used the same basic formula this whole time while every single other one of Nintendo's games has changed beautifully. Why is it that Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed get shat on for doing the exact same thing? The biggest change to the formula is the addition of 3D models, and even that hasn't changed the games significantly. It's not even like there isn't room for improvement, either. I've played X/Y (albeit, briefly) and the system felt slow.
Secondly, I, for the life of me, cannot understand what you see in X/Y's graphics. At least the 2D games' graphics were a little charming. X/Y honestly feels like a grown man in children's clothing. The design of the characters and animations are only decent, and environments are basically non-existent. They completely stripped the graphics of what made them special and now it looks like a 2D game pretending to be 3D. The game is boring to look at. Not to mention how unsaturated all of the colors are.
what am I looking at
I'm not trying to tell you to stop playing. If you enjoy the games, please, carry on. However, the reception for the games is the most mind-boggling thing I've read on GAF and I'm curious to see why the games are so beloved.
I have a couple gripes with a couple of the games' aspects.
Granted, the gameplay of the games is solid. The system is really well done and it makes for a cute RPG. However, it's been done over and over and over... The argument for this is usually about tweaking the stats of the Pokemon and the effectiveness of different types, but honestly, almost nothing has been done that evolves and benefits the games substantially. It has used the same basic formula this whole time while every single other one of Nintendo's games has changed beautifully. Why is it that Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed get shat on for doing the exact same thing? The biggest change to the formula is the addition of 3D models, and even that hasn't changed the games significantly. It's not even like there isn't room for improvement, either. I've played X/Y (albeit, briefly) and the system felt slow.
Secondly, I, for the life of me, cannot understand what you see in X/Y's graphics. At least the 2D games' graphics were a little charming. X/Y honestly feels like a grown man in children's clothing. The design of the characters and animations are only decent, and environments are basically non-existent. They completely stripped the graphics of what made them special and now it looks like a 2D game pretending to be 3D. The game is boring to look at. Not to mention how unsaturated all of the colors are.
what am I looking at
I'm not trying to tell you to stop playing. If you enjoy the games, please, carry on. However, the reception for the games is the most mind-boggling thing I've read on GAF and I'm curious to see why the games are so beloved.