• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
  • The Politics forum has been nuked. Please do not bring political discussion to the rest of the site, or you will be removed. Thanks.

Idea Factory on Monster Monpiece censorship

Status
Not open for further replies.

koutoru

Member
Sep 9, 2013
2,552
0
0
This was a very difficult decision since we work very hard to satisfy our fans and want to bring the same content being offered in Japan. However, Western society is not as lenient as that of Japan when sexual images are involved—especially images of humanoids that appear to be younger than a socially acceptable age. The borderline of what is “acceptable” will always be extremely gray and vary from person to person, but as a responsible company working in the U.S., we had to make the difficult decision that we did. We sincerely apologize for those who do not agree with any level of censorship, but we greatly appreciate your understanding with the decision we have made.

http://www.siliconera.com/2014/01/2...ship-in-monster-monpiece/#iPzt8oCdcPxQCeXo.99
 

kewlmyc

Member
Dec 15, 2011
21,237
0
540
If anyone has seen the cards they've censored, they wouldn't question as to why they were censored. Some pretty damn risque stuff, by console standards that is.
 

zeopower6

Member
Jul 29, 2012
7,880
0
540
Hopefully this doesn't end up like the last thread...

Anyway, I'm fine with the changes since all of the cards are still present in some form.

If anyone has seen the cards they've censored, they wouldn't question as to why they were censored. Some pretty damn risque stuff, by console standards that is.

Not exactly IMO... For most of them, I think it was the age thing. There are more risqué cards kept intact, I believe.
 

Psycho_Mantis

Banned
Jul 28, 2012
26,650
0
0
If anyone has seen the cards they've censored, they wouldn't question as to why they were censored. Some pretty damn risque stuff, by console standards that is.

.

Some of them look pre-pubescent. Japan is too lenient on shit like this.[
 

TomShoe

Banned
Oct 27, 2013
7,711
0
0
Hampton Roads, VA
I'm not too happy about it myself.

However, I suppose it's better to just let them censor the game as they wish, rather than have some loud, oversensitive fool make a huge fuss over this. Everyone in GAF knows how powerful a minority can be if they're loud enough.
 

Dambrosi

Banned
Jun 7, 2004
6,734
1
0
Liverpool, UK
Of course they made the right call. It's called localization, not censorship - though censoring certain unwanted or unacceptable content is certainly a part of that. Especially if said content could get you arrested in certain parts of the world.

By the way, the first person to mention my anime avatar gets a swift kick in the virtual nuts through the Internet.
 

zeopower6

Member
Jul 29, 2012
7,880
0
540
.

Some of them look pre-pubescent. Japan is too lenient on shit like this.[

It must be because of the "humanoid forms of mythological creatures/other things like brownies or whatever" that allows them to have the artist's interpretations look so young.
 
Aug 27, 2007
32,888
0
0
At least someone out there is looking out for those poor animated children.

I don't really consider this censorship. It's localization - it's a culture thing. Something that is acceptable in one region of the world may not be acceptable in another, that's completely normal and I think they made the right call. Sure it sucks for those that are okay with it and don't want to see any changes, but I highly doubt they would have been okay releasing the game in its original state at all.
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
Jul 24, 2012
38,083
1
0
Of course they made the right call. It's called localization, not censorship - though censoring certain unwanted or unacceptable content is certainly a part of that. Especially if said content could get you arrested in certain parts of the world.

Then why does Idea Factory call it censorship?

Wait, never mind, I got it. It's still censorship, even though it was necessary.
 

PixyJunket

Member
Apr 1, 2010
12,236
6
645
Plano, TX
Hmm, is it "socially acceptable" to murder other humans?

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.
 

Xerotwo

Member
Feb 2, 2008
645
0
0
Yep, not surprised when in this society absolutely makes that kind of content taboo. It wouldn't be able to be localized if they kept that in.
 
Aug 27, 2007
32,888
0
0
Hmm, is it "socially acceptable" to murder other humans?

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.

Different cultures are okay or not okay with different things. It's not that difficult to comprehend.
 

EvilKatarn

Member
Dec 17, 2012
6,192
6
0
Hmm, is it "socially acceptable" to murder other humans?

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.

This argument is so old and busted that it's boring.

Not that I disagree, really. A lot of things about games are gross.
 

Falk

that puzzling face
Aug 26, 2013
20,811
0
0
www.vgo-online.com
I'm going to make the first ever English game where the game mechanics involve images depicting insulting ancestors so that it'll get censored
I mean localized
for Asian countries.
 

BakedYams

Slayer of Combofiends
Jun 10, 2013
11,077
0
0
Japan if a completely different culture than the west. As we can clearly see there are different frustrations within the country than that of Europe and America. The japanese seem to be more frustrated in the procreation sense while others are more frustrated with jobs and the economy, as to why different games prosper in different area. GameTheory did an awesome video explaining this. What may be appalling to one may be something exquisite to another, and oddly enough Japan loves prepubescent woman. I say that with a grain of salt because I had a friend who went to Japan, pretty famous guy and everyone knew him so he got a lot to see with no limit to money. He told me one and only one thing, the Japanese are obsessed with youthfulness, especially with woman. The more youthful and slender they are, the "better" looking they are considered, takes the saying "the eye is in the beauty of the beholder". That is such the case for Japan, it is a very different culture farther down on the spectrum on what's considered normal in progressive countries (not saying that Japan isn't, but you gotta look at what they are dishing out usually and it isn't US friendly usually). So it is a matter of youth and look who has the most youth out of all women in Japan, girls who look as if they are in the range of 13-18 in Japan. Connecting these two pieces together may give some insight as to why Japan is what it is.
 

Psycho_Mantis

Banned
Jul 28, 2012
26,650
0
0
Hmm, is it "socially acceptable" to murder other humans?

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.

Two wrongs don't make a right. Also its no joke that the West is way too lenient on violence as well.
 

TxdoHawk

Member
Feb 20, 2006
5,885
0
0
Rutherford, NJ
www.twitter.com
This would be an interesting test if we had more robust DD systems: Lock the "uncensored" copy behind age verification with a $5 upcharge and see who bothers to jump through hoops. I'm genuinely curious how the numbers would turn out.

Edit: Regarding the "some cultures are more/less tolerant of certain things" argument, that's a boring old-world excuse for censorship in a modern, globalized world. It's an especially odd argument for a game like this, where it's "foreign weirdness" is inherently what makes it interesting to the target market.
 

Traumahound

Member
Jun 9, 2004
905
0
1,410
Canada
Too gray for me.

 
Jul 13, 2009
18,064
2
0
Mexico
Be it localization or censorship, I'm not supporting this game because of it.

Even if I still kinda get why they have to do it, it would still sour my experience.
 
Feb 4, 2013
6,669
0
510
USA
Of course they made the right call. It's called localization, not censorship - though censoring certain unwanted or unacceptable content is certainly a part of that. Especially if said content could get you arrested in certain parts of the world.
This is absolutely correct. Not every culture is the same or has the same idea of right and wrong. What if we were talking about a game that was extremely racist? Like 1940s Disney level racist? You can't bring stuff like that over as is.
 
Aug 27, 2007
32,888
0
0
What happened there? I missed it. It blew up I remember and I was to tired to read it lol.

Things got pretty crazy. Then some wackjob started defending his consumption of child porn (not lolicon hentai or anything, actual child porn). You can imagine how off-the-rails things got at that point.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Feb 19, 2008
44,007
7
0
Hmm, is it "socially acceptable" to murder other humans?

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.

How many of them let you murder kids?

I know it's hard for a certain segment of posters to understand, but children are different from adults.
 

BakedYams

Slayer of Combofiends
Jun 10, 2013
11,077
0
0
How many of them let you murder kids?

I know it's hard for a certain segment of posters to understand, but children are different from adults.

Sadly its a double standard, neither concepts of girls being portrayed in such a fashion and gun crazy enemies spluttering blood should be acceptable for a humane and sane society.
 

Griss

Member
Sep 26, 2013
11,685
13
515
Dublin, Ireland
Hmm, is it "socially acceptable" to murder other humans?

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.

There is a context to violence. Fighting for freedom, for example. Fighting in self-defence. Most games have some kind of a context to frame the violence as acceptable. Those that don't, or do so weakly (say, Manhunt) tend to get a lot of shit.

There is no context to sexually suggestive drawings of preteens. It's there to get perverts off. That's it. The two things aren't really comparable.
 

baekshi

Banned
Feb 24, 2011
7,513
0
0
NY
This thread is off to a great start

Because there sure are seem to be A LOT of games being made that reward the player for murdering humans without any censorship.
im pretty sure they're countries that censor games like COD including japan
 
Feb 28, 2009
39,032
2
0
Wow, I assume that poster got banned.

Yes.

I think his viewpoint was more "it's already been made, so it isn't hurting anyone", which is at least somewhat logical (if not gross and a clear indication said person needs help) if you don't take into account the fact that consuming it creates a market for it, meaning more kids getting harmed.
 

bishoptl

Banstick Emeritus
Jun 6, 2004
29,794
9
0
Canada
If this turns into another chickenhawk apologist thread, God help you all.

edit: "chickenhawk" in the gender-neutral definition of the term, that is. Leave them kids alone.
 

Busaiku

Member
Apr 5, 2006
46,928
1
0
Of course they made the right call. It's called localization, not censorship - though censoring certain unwanted or unacceptable content is certainly a part of that. Especially if said content could get you arrested in certain parts of the world.

By the way, the first person to mention my anime avatar gets a swift kick in the virtual nuts through the Internet.
Bravely Default, I can agree with, as something was done to compensate for that outfit change (I even like the costume change myself). However, this is completely removing content with no substitutes. If they made the monsters they removed look older, that would be localization, this is completely censoring it.
 

biggersmaller

Banned
Sep 14, 2007
4,670
0
1,100
MPLS
A crazy guy was saying there isn't anything wrong with being a pedophile and that CP is fine if you aren't directly involved in its creation.

Yeah....

Also, bans for posting CP
pics from the game
. These types of games are terrible, and those defending them lack the sense to pick their battles.
 

jim-jam bongs

Member
Dec 5, 2008
20,457
0
935
Emerald City
There is a context to violence. Fighting for freedom, for example. Fighting in self-defence. Most games have some kind of a context to frame the violence as acceptable. Those that don't, or do so weakly (say, Manhunt) tend to get a lot of shit.

There is no context to sexually suggestive drawings of preteens. It's there to get perverts off. That's it. The two things aren't really comparable.

Ding ding ding.
 

zeopower6

Member
Jul 29, 2012
7,880
0
540
Yes.

I think his viewpoint was more "it's already been made, so it isn't hurting anyone", which is at least somewhat logical (if not gross and a clear indication said person needs help) if you don't take into account the fact that consuming it creates a market for it, meaning more kids getting harmed.

Honestly, it probably could have been avoided if porn hadn't been brought up like every 5 posts for whatever reason.

Also, the cards (for the most part, anyway) are still in the game! It's just that they don't have as much clothing taken off in the Western version. So the Goblin? She's still there and rubbable, but her clothes will remain on.
 
Aug 7, 2007
2,373
0
0
Not enough.

Best game ever: Deus Ex.

I liked Fallout 1/2's approach to child killing a bit better, but I hate that devs are so afraid of having it in their games that they'd make children immortal godlike creatures (and rub it in your face by making them the most annoying characters in the game).

On Topic: The positive buzz for the game kinda had me a bit interested, but I won't support censorship. I may get the Japanese version if I really really want the game, but I'll probably just skip it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.