Where are these confirmed specs? I keep seeing numbers from the rumors page. This was stated like it's a for sure fact... Source?Hey folks
1. PS5 is 12.2 RDNA 1.5 and XSX is 12.05 RDNA 1.5
2. PS5 3.6Ghz Zen 2 and XSX is 3.5Ghz
3. PS5 has 18GB+4gigs of ddr4 GDDR6 and XSX has 16 GB.
4. PS5 SSD 5.8GB/s upto 6GB/s on D1 and XSX for now is 3.5GB/s
5. Secret saucefor PS5
XSX is alot quieter.
I am an intern at third party studio cannot reveal my source but everything above is 100% legit.
It could have been believable, till you said between 2080 and the super
. Definitely lost your credibility there buddy.I am not saying natively but you can expect that level not sure about Devkit 3 which are out in WWSIt could have been believable, till you said between 2080 and the super
First of all, everyone comparing consoles to Nvidia, makes no sense. It'll be all AMD hardware, from cpu to gpu.
Secondly, these consoles would cost a fortune to have that kinda power. Thirdly, how much power can the power supply handle?
Lastly, where will all that heat go?! Especially in a small constricted box. Those fans would sound like a jet engine taking off.
You are right wait till Devkit 3. And 8K promise is like 4K on Pro. Very good machines for 1080p,2K and 4K also.
So... No explanation to my questions, at all... I'm doubting you even more now...
Ok, you will see at GDC.
What will I see? That your rumored specs aren't real? I am asking legitimate questions about wattage and TDP of the machine. I'm not asking for more fake specs.
Why would these chips be compared with Nvidia? They have different architecture, implementation of RT/X, etc. Do you realize how much that chip costs to begin with? Are you implying consoles will launch at 699 or 799?
Because there is no RT on AMD GPUs in the market.
So your implying that it'll have similar Ray tracing cu's like the Nvidia counterpart, but not the performance of that card?
Yeah, cause I have no problems with consoles. Just hate how ignorant people with no knowledge of how hardware works, blabber out stupid stuff like how pc players are going be the bottom of the barrel in regards to power compared to consoles. If that were the case, games would be developed on console, not pc's
Seems like there won't be much of those this gen. And of course the best multiplatforms are on pc.
Yea, I'm looking forward to playing the next God of War on PC
But let's forget about exclusives for a second and pretend everything under the sun is also on PC. It's very hard to build a PC with the same form factor, quiteness and bang for your buck as a console from launch. You also forget the fact that games are highly optimized for these machines which increases the bang for your buck further as time progresses; your mid-to-high range GPU purchase from 2020 may not be ideal for 2022 titles, but these games will be highly optimized and part of the 2nd/3rd gen software where consoles shine, and sure, you can buy a GPU in 2022 that will kick the consoles butts, but now you're 2 GPU purchases deep.
Here's what I would recommend, instead of purchasing an expensive GPU that probably costs as much, if not more than Xbox Series X, you instead buy an Xbox Series X, and with it you can play ALL of Xbox games all the way down to OG Xbox titles, fast SSD load times for new titles and all other benefits of the new generation, and then a couple of years down the road, maybe 2022, NOW you build your PC, but don't built it at the console's launch, that's just dumb.
Months? Did you not turn your pc on at all during that time? Or are you one of those console liars? Your post history will confirm it
PS5 specs is big unknown, however XSX 12TF is pretty much confirmed.
I had to upgrade my graphics card (it was a GeForce GTX 1060) and my ssd before I could/wanted to play it. $400 later, I boot up Red Dead with flickering issues during cinematics and it kicking out of the game with "Red Dead Redemption 2 exited unexpectedly" and not to mention stuttering issues. Red Dead isn't the only 3rd party game to have issues on PC either. So with games not being able to function properly without updating your drivers, or your power supply, your GPU and/or CPU not to mention you may have to increase your storage. It's no wonder console players don't jump to PC. Too much shit to worry about when you can just plug in and play.
A simple update of your graphics card, would remedy that immediately. But based on your previous posts, I don't think that is the case at all. It's easy to distinguish a console player, trying to be a pc player, easily. All of your posts, have nothing to do with pc, so I highly doubt that to be true. But go ahead and tell us about the complications, you experienced.
well i don't know abou gow since that aint on pc but doom on my old rig with a 7870 and an i5 4460 (which back in 2013 would have been considered a mid range pc) sure as hell plays and looks better than a base 2013 ps4
www.google.com
So pretty much only 2 games that had issues in over 4 years time. Can't say that's any worse than playing those exact games on console where they drop into the low 20fps. Has that been fixed yet? No. Seems like you had other issues with your pc. Just about all games don't exhibit problems, unless it's user error. Very rare cases are compatibility issues, and just need to update something.Red Dead Redemption 2: Rockstar explains why PC game had so many issues
The publisher says the problems stemmed from a combination of drivers, CPUs and GPUs.
No actually I wasn't the only one having issues like these. and that's the point I'm trying to make. It's easy to say well why don't you just build a PC. but a lot of console players don't understand that playing games on PC may requires some type of troubleshooting. Hell I remember when my brother got Arkham Knight on PC it was practically unplayabl for weeks and the console version had no issues at all. The last time I checked Red Dead didn't have these issues on PS4 or the Xbox they're sure has shit had it on PC. The point I'm trying to make has nothing to do about building PC's it's the fact that the support from third-party developers on PC is pretty fucking shitty.
The question is if they are rdna too. Older rumors suggested next gen xbox was based on vega architecture.
I think nier also had issues, and there's also the games using denuvo.
And that can be a problem with a game, but i would rather play with much higher fps with frame pacing, than play at 30fps and under, with frame stuttering. Still not the best experience. But that falls on the developers, not the hardware, and pc will still have the better performance.
I build my first PC in 1999, it was P2 400MHz + TNT2 32MB + 64MB (RAM was extremely expensive back then, however my parents bought me another 64MB few months later). During 21 years only Gears Of War 4 refused to run on my PC (I had 8700K + 1080ti two years ago), but thats just one game.
There is no such thing as RDNA or Vega FLOPS. 2x xbox x GPU power is exactly 12TF (FLOPS is GPU power metric). Keep in mind, Phil Spencer also compared XSX performance to 8x Xbox One power (1.3-1.4TF GCN Tahiti), and only 12TF fits the description for both.
Imagine trying to play a 360 game on Xbox one at release date. That's what it seems like you're friends problems boiled down to. Probably bought hardware around 10 years ago, or even earlier. They were trying to play a new age game, with specs that require more than they had. If it was different, let me know, and what specs they had.
DoctaThompson in animated form.
Just kidding.