not now, but probably on 7 years those consoles will run games at better settings than a 2080ti because optimization
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Indie Dev suggests both consoles exhibit RTX 2070 performance, says "we don't see many differences"
- Thread starter Jigsaah
- Start date
not now, but probably on 7 years those consoles will run games at better settings than a 2080ti because optimization
Heimdall_Xtreme
Jim Ryan Fanclub's #1 Member
Exactly as the guy from epic games of yesterday that say that ps5 is a masterpiece... Right now the Devs people must make a Blowjob to Sony and MicrosoftDevs have to be very careful about what they say about the new consoles, one wrong word and the warriors are beating their war drums.
Thugnificient
Banned
Yay. In 7 years the consoles will run games better than a decade old card that will be firmly into legacy territory and will have had its drivers support dropped 3 years prior. Can't wait!
Bernkastel
Ask me about my fanboy energy!
And how is the dev on OP so certain ? Grant Kot is himself working on a Xbox Series X game.
Yes he said that. In one interview he said Series X is on parity with PC version quality. In another interview he said XSX version would be 4K 60 fps, when asked about 'in-engine footage representative of expected Xbox Series X visual quality' he said the trailer was running on 2080 Ti with Ryzen Processor, further clarified that 2070 Super can run it at 4K 60 fps with a 'mixture of settings' . He also said that Steam reccomended settings are outdated based on a older build. So,
- Xbox Series X version is on parity with PC version quality
- Xbox Series X version runs at 4K 60 fps
- Trailer that said 'in-engine footage representative of expected Xbox Series X visual quality' was running on RTX 2080 Ti with Ryzen processor
- 2070 Super can also do 4K 60 fps at lower settings
- Steam specs are outdated
Thugnificient
Banned
And you're just making up him saying it is equivalent to a 2080 Ti. What it is saying is that the build running on a 2080 Ti can be achieved with an SX, not that they are equal.
I swear people have problems with reading or just understand what they want to.
GHG
Member
So... He's hypothesising.
He even states he doesn't have dev kits yet.
Christ alive.
I know how boost behaviour works and Nvidia's peak TF numbers are based on the boost clocks stated on their spec sheet. When developers talk about relative performance that is what they will be referencing, not overclocked or binned chips.
Last edited:
Bernkastel
Ask me about my fanboy energy!
Yes, but dont forget that is a $1200 card today
Thugnificient
Banned
True but do enthusiasts honestly care their cards won't be relevant in 7 years? That's like 3 lifetimes in GPU years.
GHG
Member
The tweets you posted earlier in the thread suggest otherwise:
Unless you have some more up to date information to share?
MisterBrimstone
Member
"My indie 8-bit platformer runs the same on both consoles so they are the same" - Indie Developer #43
Bernkastel
Ask me about my fanboy energy!
I meant the Scorn devs have dev kits, the quote was from their interview.
Grant Kot is working on a different game
The dev himself posted later in that thread about his project
Trainsmove
Banned
Thats not right. A high clock speed is to cover the fact that you only have 36CU. So if the fastest part is not all the way through the pipeline then what's there point. XSX is wide so it will not need to be fast.
