• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Jeff Epstein Arrested due to Mike Cernovich Court Win

#Phonepunk#

Member
Sep 4, 2018
4,815
5,787
595
so Trump actually banned this guy from his resort, which is a point in his favor. also he was paying legit adult sex worker porn stars for sex which is another point in his favour, oddly enough.
 
  • LOL
Reactions: NickFire

Tesseract

Crushed by Thanos
Dec 7, 2008
34,806
7,230
1,340
Having watched this circus for awhile (including Alex Jones' initial claim to fame w the Bohemian Grove stuff) I am beginning to wonder if the banning across all those various platforms was done to push conspiracy theorists into believing Jones is credible. Not a dumb idea if you believe those people are "deplorables" and beyond the point of no return. You might as well make them chase their own tail. No offense to UFO believers, but I feel like that was handled in much the same way but stretched across several decades.

Psyops shit. It certainly is not out of character with modern governments.
possible, probable

jones is credible on a lot of issues tho, but he also says kooky shit
 

bigedole

Gold Member
Mar 10, 2015
1,601
1,903
655
Austin, TX
It's mind blowing that the lawyer is literally saying "Trump is the only person who has reached out to help us" and the media/technocrats are still spinning this as an anti-Trump story. Like, do the people manipulating search auto-complete suggestions at Google even stop to ponder if what they're doing is at all ethical? Do they just not care?
 
  • Thoughtful
Reactions: infinitys_7th

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
12,249
21,926
1,185
USA
dunpachi.com
It's mind blowing that the lawyer is literally saying "Trump is the only person who has reached out to help us" and the media/technocrats are still spinning this as an anti-Trump story. Like, do the people manipulating search auto-complete suggestions at Google even stop to ponder if what they're doing is at all ethical? Do they just not care?
Of course they care. They're on the right side of history and so they feel perfectly justified and moral in what they do.
 

NickFire

Member
Mar 12, 2014
4,607
3,317
625
It's mind blowing that the lawyer is literally saying "Trump is the only person who has reached out to help us" and the media/technocrats are still spinning this as an anti-Trump story. Like, do the people manipulating search auto-complete suggestions at Google even stop to ponder if what they're doing is at all ethical? Do they just not care?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: autoduelist

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
It's mind blowing that the lawyer is literally saying "Trump is the only person who has reached out to help us" and the media/technocrats are still spinning this as an anti-Trump story. Like, do the people manipulating search auto-complete suggestions at Google even stop to ponder if what they're doing is at all ethical? Do they just not care?
The battle being waged is bigger than this. Maybe not Alex Jones multiple dimensions big, but certainly future of the world big. Trump can not be allowed to have a victory, nor be allowed to win 2020. Anything will be justified to this end. Trump v multinationals v globalists battle royale, loosely defined, with some crossover and other lesser groups with their hats in the ring. That Trump is even still standing given the power already wielded against him is awe inspiring. It's why the critiques of Trump crack me up.... imho no other personality could withstand this, let alone cut through it.
 

Zangiefy360

Member
Aug 30, 2018
824
1,372
375
It's mind blowing that the lawyer is literally saying "Trump is the only person who has reached out to help us" and the media/technocrats are still spinning this as an anti-Trump story. Like, do the people manipulating search auto-complete suggestions at Google even stop to ponder if what they're doing is at all ethical? Do they just not care?
The left doesn't care about what's ethical. During the #metoo blow up, many members on the purple alternative, Reddit, and other left leaning communities proudly proclaimed that they didn't care if innocent people were falsely accused in the hysteria as long as they ones they hoped were guilty were nailed in the end.
 

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Apr 18, 2018
12,249
21,926
1,185
USA
dunpachi.com
The left doesn't care about what's ethical. During the #metoo blow up, many members on the purple alternative, Reddit, and other left leaning communities proudly proclaimed that they didn't care if innocent people were falsely accused in the hysteria as long as they ones they hoped were guilty were nailed in the end.
That behavior is core to their ideology:

Reversing the old axiom which Peter the First introduced into military law, and to which Catherine II gave lip-service, namely, that it is better to pardon ten criminals than to condemn one innocent man, the G.P.U. sacrificed a hundred innocents rather than miss one "traitor." Spying in all forms, paid, voluntary or obligatory, and sometimes provocation, furnished ample material for its amazing technique of inquisition and punishment. The knout, which had been abolished by Tsarism in the preceding century, under Stalin became once more "the favourite instrument of the State Nemesis" as Shchedrin once put it.

Source.
 

Pumpkin Seeds

Member
Jul 13, 2018
556
607
365
According to zerohedge and daily beast(so indie news and corp news), Acosta defended his handling of the Epstein case to the White House by saying the soft deal was due to Epstein belonging to "Intelligence". He was asked about Epstein being an Intelligence asset today and wiggled around it. Saying the news is "going down rabbit holes", which is a.... peculiar way of answering the question.
 
Last edited:

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
According to zerohedge and daily beast(so indie news and corp news), Acosta defended his handling of the Epstein case to the White House by saying the soft deal was due to Epstein belonging to "Intelligence". He was asked about Epstein being an Intelligence asset today and wiggled around it. Saying the news is "going down rabbit holes", which is a.... peculiar way of answering the question.
There are documents suggesting Epstein was a confidential informant of....

Mueller's FBI.

Robert Swan Mueller III (/ˈmʌlər/; born August 7, 1944) is an American lawyer and government official who served as the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2001 to 2013.


 

DKehoe

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2007
5,008
706
1,235
No, I do not.

If you want a recent example just look to the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing fiasco. The entire left was on board with the smear job.
The entire left meaning every single person whose political views are on the left?
 

DKehoe

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2007
5,008
706
1,235
I guess it makes it simpler to think of things that way.

Which leftists did you see expressing outrage over the treatment Kavanaugh received? All I can recall is people jumping on the bandwagon or being completely silent.
I mean I'm on the left and I thought it was a circus being put on as a political manoeuvre. But apparently I'm in on it too.
 

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
The entire left meaning every single person whose political views are on the left?
While I am not part of this conversation, please don't be so pedantic as to not understand that with any generalization there will always be exceptions. This doesn't mean the generalization above is true, or that it is false, but quibbling over he potential for exceptions when it's cold stone clear a generalization is being made is silly.
 

DKehoe

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2007
5,008
706
1,235
While I am not part of this conversation, please don't be so pedantic as to not understand that with any generalization there will always be exceptions. This doesn't mean the generalization above is true, or that it is false, but quibbling over he potential for exceptions when it's cold stone clear a generalization is being made is silly.
I asked them to clarify if they meant literally everyone whose political views are on the left. They said yes. My problem is the generalisation.
 
Last edited:

Ornlu

Member
Oct 31, 2018
264
239
255
I guess it makes it simpler to think of things that way.



I mean I'm on the left and I thought it was a circus being put on as a political manoeuvre. But apparently I'm in on it too.
I was genuinely asking. I'm glad you saw through the façade. Did anyone at all who represents or supports your political interests as a public figure express this belief?
 

DKehoe

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2007
5,008
706
1,235
If you're being pedantic, I'm going to treat you accordingly.
Alright, I misread the tone then. My apologies. These days people (on both sides) are way too quick to demonise people who are on "the other side." I wondered if you were taking such a broad view and wanted to ask you about it. If that's not the case then fair enough..

I was genuinely asking. I'm glad you saw through the façade. Did anyone at all who represents or supports your political interests as a public figure express this belief?
I'm not sure off the top of my heads to be honest. And yeh that's a problem. Events instantly become partisan issues where people are expected to immediately take up whatever argument your side has adopted and not consider why the other side might have the opinions they do. And it leads to situations where you are playing games with real people's lives. It also leads people to think things like "we're the side that cares about the truth and they just have no integrity" which is a worrying distinction to think you are drawing, but one that seems to be becoming more common.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ornlu

Ornlu

Member
Oct 31, 2018
264
239
255
Alright, I misread the tone then. My apologies. These days people (on both sides) are way too quick to demonise people who are on "the other side." I wondered if you were taking such a broad view and wanted to ask you about it. If that's not the case then fair enough..



I'm not sure off the top of my heads to be honest. And yeh that's a problem. Events instantly become partisan issues where people are expected to immediately take up whatever argument your side has adopted and not consider why the other side might have the opinions they do. And it leads to situations where you are playing games with real people's lives. It also leads people to think things like "we're the side that cares about the truth and they just have no integrity" which is a worrying distinction to think you are drawing, but one that seems to be becoming more common.
That was my issue with the whole circus/drama around that particular "scandal". There was obvious BS being thrown about that was absolutely destroying peoples' lives. I would honestly love to have a left-wing figure to point to that I could say stood up for the right thing in that case, but unfortunately I cannot. I was extremely surprised that the smear campaign didn't work, to be honest. Most if not all other presidents would have caved under the pressure and just withdrawn Kavanaugh as the nominee. Trump just didn't give a flying fuck about the political fallout from the smear (it's true, whether one sees that as a good or bad thing).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKehoe

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
That was my issue with the whole circus/drama around that particular "scandal". There was obvious BS being thrown about that was absolutely destroying peoples' lives. I would honestly love to have a left-wing figure to point to that I could say stood up for the right thing in that case, but unfortunately I cannot. I was extremely surprised that the smear campaign didn't work, to be honest. Most if not all other presidents would have caved under the pressure and just withdrawn Kavanaugh as the nominee. Trump just didn't give a flying fuck about the political fallout from the smear (it's true, whether one sees that as a good or bad thing).
Tim Pool stood up for Kavanaugh. Unfortunately, he is called far right now despite being a socialist [pro-ubi, pro-univeral health care if the economics 'could be figured out' [lol], pro-regulations, etc].

But that's the issue the original generalization points out. Anyone who goes against the party line on the left is instantly excised from the left by the far left radicals who have been given the driver's seat in terms of policy and agenda.
 

Ornlu

Member
Oct 31, 2018
264
239
255
Tim Pool stood up for Kavanaugh. Unfortunately, he is called far right now despite being a socialist [pro-ubi, pro-univeral health care if the economics 'could be figured out' [lol], pro-regulations, etc].

But that's the issue the original generalization points out. Anyone who goes against the party line on the left is instantly excised from the left by the far left radicals who have been given the driver's seat in terms of policy and agenda.
True. And he's a pariah on the left now for not sticking to the script on a number of issues. In reality, being "on the left", or a leftist means that you MUST conform publicly to whatever the issue of the day is. You can't be a pro-life socialist, for example. Your pro-life stance will see you removed from the left.
 

Barsinister

Gold Member
Jan 16, 2008
1,302
1,246
1,255
USA
Didn't Hoover's F.B.I. have all kinds of files on "unAmericans" and their "habits"? We had a thread recently on M.L. King's files. I think Epstein's asset classification is just that, dirt on the rich and powerful. The specter of J. Edgar Hoover still lingers.
 

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
Didn't Hoover's F.B.I. have all kinds of files on "unAmericans" and their "habits"? We had a thread recently on M.L. King's files. I think Epstein's asset classification is just that, dirt on the rich and powerful. The specter of J. Edgar Hoover still lingers.
Larry flynt supposedly has a massive blackmail file that will be publicized on his death, or some such rumor.
 

MastAndo

Member
Oct 13, 2014
969
317
400


Google responds, "There's nothing to see here."
Not to say that I don't find this plausible, but none of the other search engines yield results with pictures of the two of them together either...nor do any of these reports have Google images as they appeared before the scrub.
 

HenkDV

Member
Aug 11, 2018
714
563
315
Not to say that I don't find this plausible, but none of the other search engines yield results with pictures of the two of them together either...nor do any of these reports have Google images as they appeared before the scrub.
Are you suggesting maybe @BreakingNLive isn't a reputable news source, but will used on this website to further people's agendas regardless? :eek:
 

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
Not to say that I don't find this plausible, but none of the other search engines yield results with pictures of the two of them together either...nor do any of these reports have Google images as they appeared before the scrub.
You're probably right, though they do seem to be scrubbing search results and autofills. Trump is in many results and images when i search for 'clinton epstein', though that could be a somewhat natural result of fair algorithms.
 

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
Are you suggesting maybe @BreakingNLive isn't a reputable news source, but will used on this website to further people's agendas regardless? :eek:
Of course breaking news is unreliable. Unreliable doesn't means always wrong, and given that we know google is intentionally altering fillins, etc, it's not a great stretch to believe they would go further. The difference is we understand breaking news is unreliable and don't call for kids to be murdered over bad takes.
 

MastAndo

Member
Oct 13, 2014
969
317
400
Are you suggesting maybe @BreakingNLive isn't a reputable news source, but will used on this website to further people's agendas regardless? :eek:
I can't say I'm familiar with them, so not really insinuating anything. Truth be told, I do believe Google to be pushing their liberal agenda, I just don't see anything showing that to be the case here.
 

danielberg

Member
Jun 20, 2018
2,329
2,651
375
I can't say I'm familiar with them, so not really insinuating anything. Truth be told, I do believe Google to be pushing their liberal agenda, I just don't see anything showing that to be the case here.
You mean besides deleting the auto complete if you combine clinton and epstein as search and google changing the search algo so you dont get clintons, obama or bill and epsteain pics and articles like it was just a week ago, funny isnt it... you kinda have to be blind to just dont see it, its also worth pointing out this ONLY happened to the google search duckduckgo and even bing for example didnt change all that much and on the epstein wikipage there is now a documented history of a sudden urge over the last week to clean any connections to dems and clintons so thats cool too lol
 
Last edited:

MastAndo

Member
Oct 13, 2014
969
317
400
You mean besides deleting the auto complete if you combine clinton and epstein as search and google changing the search algo so you dont get clintons, obama or bill and epsteain pics and articles like it was just a week ago, funny isnt it... you kinda have to be blind to just dont see it, its also worth pointing out this ONLY happened to the google search duckduckgo and even bing for example didnt change all that much and on the epstein wikipage there is now a documented history of a sudden urge over the last week to clean any connections to dems and clintons so thats cool too lol
I was referring to the image scrubbing, in particular.
 

danielberg

Member
Jun 20, 2018
2,329
2,651
375
I was referring to the image scrubbing, in particular.
Me too as well as all the other shit they are doing on accident suddenly in this particular timeframe but not a month,week or year ago... but all at the same time in the same timeframe ...what a mystery...
 
Last edited:
  • Thoughtful
Reactions: DeepEnigma

Weiji

Member
Jul 20, 2018
389
362
305
Been listening to a lot of conversation about this and what I find interesting is how basically no one seems to mention Mike Cernovich.

Dude is a fucking hero that took down one of the best protected men in recent history.

Wherever you are Mike I hope you enjoying yourself, you stunning example of humanity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cryptoadam

cryptoadam

... and he cannot lie
Feb 21, 2018
5,673
5,770
880
Hmm how about some investigators look into this

Before his initial conviction, Epstein also had ties to Clinton and his family’s group, the Clinton Foundation. Epstein contributed to Clinton’s presidential campaign and through his C.O.U.Q. nonprofit in 2006 reportedly sent $25,000 to the foundation. A spokesman for Clinton has said the former president has not spoken with Epstein for over a decade and has no knowledge of his alleged crimes.


Once the media see's it can't pin anything on Trump, but a shit ton on Clinton they will bury the story and stop covering it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: autoduelist

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
Hmm how about some investigators look into this

Before his initial conviction, Epstein also had ties to Clinton and his family’s group, the Clinton Foundation. Epstein contributed to Clinton’s presidential campaign and through his C.O.U.Q. nonprofit in 2006 reportedly sent $25,000 to the foundation. A spokesman for Clinton has said the former president has not spoken with Epstein for over a decade and has no knowledge of his alleged crimes.


Once the media see's it can't pin anything on Trump, but a shit ton on Clinton they will bury the story and stop covering it.
I'm pretty sure i read there were clinton foundation ties in the millions. Let me see if i can find that.
 

autoduelist

Member
Aug 30, 2014
8,562
7,441
715
Hmm how about some investigators look into this

Before his initial conviction, Epstein also had ties to Clinton and his family’s group, the Clinton Foundation. Epstein contributed to Clinton’s presidential campaign and through his C.O.U.Q. nonprofit in 2006 reportedly sent $25,000 to the foundation. A spokesman for Clinton has said the former president has not spoken with Epstein for over a decade and has no knowledge of his alleged crimes.


Once the media see's it can't pin anything on Trump, but a shit ton on Clinton they will bury the story and stop covering it.
I think i was thinking of this:



Bolding mine

Attorneys for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein touted his close friendship with Bill Clinton and even claimed the billionaire helped start Clinton's controversial family foundation in a 2007 letter aimed at boosting his image during plea negotiations, FoxNews.com has learned.

The 23-page letter, written by high-powered lawyers Alan Dershowitz and Gerald Lefcourt, was apparently part of an ultimately successful bid to negotiate a plea deal before Epstein could be tried for using underage girls in a sex ring based in Palm Beach, Fla., and his private island estate on the 72-acre Virgin Islands home dubbed “Orgy Island.” Epstein spent 13 months in prison and home detention after agreeing to a plea deal in which he admitted to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution.

"Mr. Epstein was part of the original group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, which is described as a project 'bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges,” read the July 2007 letter to the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Southern District of Florida. “Focuses of this initiative include poverty, climate change, global health, and religious and ethnic conflicts.”
In an effort to emphasize Epstein’s close ties to Clinton before he was sentenced, his lawyers also credited Epstein with "hosting" a trip to Africa in 2002 on his private Boeing 727 for the Clinton Global Initiative, which Clinton himself attended, along with actor Kevin Spacey and comedian Chris Tucker, and other celebrities, purportedly for an anti-AIDS and economic-development mission.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, which obtained the data from the whistle-blower, documented $81 million being routed from HSBC Swiss accounts to The Clinton Foundation, including money from Epstein.

Epstein had various accounts totaling $3.5 million, the investigative journalists group revealed and, in 2006, directed $25,000 to The Clinton Foundation.
That last one might be where i thought millions.

This goes deep. The entire Clinton Foundation. I still think this has ties to HRC bleachbitting servers, etc.[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:

infinitys_7th

Member
Oct 1, 2006
4,375
4,258
1,265
His wikipedia page is getting edited up the wazoo lately. Wonder why?

They removed Clinton from any prominent mention and play up Trump, despite his administration being the one with the balls to go after Epstein.

There is no proven "close tie" with Trump. Trump banned the fucker for trying to molest girls of staff and visitors at Mar A Lago.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WindomURL

Elcid

Gold Member
Jul 27, 2018
952
1,057
500
It amazes me that Epstein came out in the news in 2016 and was reported on by a few people, including Fox I believe yet no one did a single fucking thing. He was allowed to continue for 3 years before finally being arrested?!

@WindomURL Funny, as an ethnic Jew, it amazes me how many people are naive to the fact that Jewish is an ethnicity and not just a religion. I always tell people, "Really? You guessed my religion by staring at my face?" or "Since when can you DNA test someone for their religion?"
 
Last edited: