godhandiscen said:What settings?
DX10 very high?beermonkey@tehbias said:No AA, vsync enabled.
very high? Doesn't it say low, medium, and high there?godhandiscen said:DX10 very high?
godhandiscen said:DX10 very high?
Could you try the DMC4 demo bench?beermonkey@tehbias said:I'll get Vista 64 installed in the next week or two, maybe this weekend. I do have a license but it isn't installed right now.
My bigger concern at the moment is getting my LPCM surround working.
Interestingly I used the auto-tune and overclocked the system substantially (690 GPU, 1168 RAM), but Crysis didn't really run any faster on high. Must be hitting some bottleneck.
I read the chart wrong. Also, BeerMonkey, why dont you try Very High?zoku88 said:very high? Doesn't it say low, medium, and high there?
Vic said:Could you try the DMC4 demo bench?
When you go back, do you actually see that your settings remain the same?beermonkey@tehbias said:OK, give me a bit.
I don't think ATI Overdrive is actually keeping my higher clock settings after the test, so I don't think I've really tested Crysis overclocked yet. Not a big deal to me, though.
godhandiscen said:When you go back, do you actually see that your settings remain the same?
The bottom boxes never get updated. When you see overdrive you are in desktop mode, so thats why you see that. If you are right though, then maybe the boxes did get updated in 8.5 because I just updated to 8.6 and it shows the same to me.beermonkey@tehbias said:The bottom boxes with the 'current' settings don't get updated even after the test succeeds and I tell it to apply the settings.
godhandiscen said:The GTX200b series will hit in early 2009 and that could turn things around. .
Vic said:Could you try the DMC4 demo bench?
godhandiscen said:The bottom boxes never get updated. When you see overdrive you are in desktop mode, so thats why you see that. If you are right though, then maybe the boxes did get updated in 8.5 because I just updated to 8.6 and it shows the same to me.
mr stroke said:is the 200b supposed to be a "GTX280 Ultra" of some sorts or will this be a refresh of what we have now?
brain_stew said:Any GAFers after a 4850 for $190, go, go go:
http://fxvideocards.com/Sapphire-HD-Radeon-4850-p-16386.html
They seem pretty highly regarded on xtreme systems so it seems a safe bet.
dammit very tempting with my PSU shipped also I'm all set.brain_stew said:Any GAFers after a 4850 for $190, go, go go:
http://fxvideocards.com/Sapphire-HD-Radeon-4850-p-16386.html
They seem pretty highly regarded on xtreme systems so it seems a safe bet.
bathala said:dammit very tempting with my PSU shipped also I'm all set.
but the cooling/temperature is worrying me. cuz some brands have good cooling
I dont know, but my bet is just a refresh. Nvidia right now is being pressured because for the first time in 2 years they are not in the lead. So this refresh could be rushed or something. By then ATI will also have something up to its sleeve.mr stroke said:is the 200b supposed to be a "GTX280 Ultra" of some sorts or will this be a refresh of what we have now?
Corrected.brain_stew said:Its a die shrink to 55nm. Whether Nvidia choose to increase clocks or tweak the architecture remains to be seen.
so wat's the verdict on cooling? not bad? no squeeling sound? fan not like xbox 360?beermonkey@tehbias said:All of the launch cards use the same reference design and the same cooler.
So if you game at 720p, or a little higher at 1280x1024, and you don't want to play Crysis, how much video card would you really need? I feel like we're in this weird phase where, for the most part, the hardware has outpaced the software.beermonkey@tehbias said:Since my TV can never go over 60fps, I turned on vsync and ran it at max settings (8x MSAA, Super High shadows, Super High textures, etc). Remember, this is 720p.
It ran a perfect 60fps, the line on the chart never wavered and each scene averaged 60fps.
Of course it gave me a 'B' rank and said I might want to upgrade. :lol
I'm running it again without vsync just to see what the averages are for each scene.
Desktop mode, that makes sense.
I'm going to do a 3DMark 06 at both standard and overclocked speeds.
Quiet. Thats all I have read. Supposedly the temps are what you would expect of a card this gen.bathala said:so wat's the verdict on cooling? not bad? no squeeling sound? fan not like xbox 360?
because i'm ready to push that place your order button
bought itgodhandiscen said:Quiet. Thats all I have read. Supposedly the temps are what you would expect of a card this gen.
SapientWolf said:So if you game at 720p, or a little higher at 1280x1024, and you don't want to play Crysis, how much video card would you really need? I feel like we're in this weird phase where, for the most part, the hardware has outpaced the software.
The GeForce 9800 GTX+ takes the highly efficient G92-based GeForce 9800 GTX and offers unbeatable value for value conscious gamers.
Key product points:
GeForce 9800 GTX+ is the best single card price/performance at $229; the original GeForce 9800 GTX will transition to $199
Processor clock of 1836MHz and graphics clock of 738MHz
GeForce PhysX support! Worlds only physics API for both the CPU and the GPU!
Support for CUDA-based applications, including Folding@Home and Badaboom video transcoding applications.
Support for 2-way and 3-way SLI
Final Thoughts
What's great about the HD 4850 isn't just the fact that it offers excellent value for money in Crossfire, but also that the performance you get is the difference between playing games at 1920 x 1200 and not. While the HD 4850 on its lonesome is probably best for gaming at up to about 1680 x 1050, if you really want to up the ante and get some 1920 x 1200 or 2560 x 1600 gaming in, going Crossfire is definitely the right thing to do.
Pimpbaa said:My radeon 3870 is feeling old...MUST RESIST BUYING NEW CARD!
Pachael said:Tweaktown has got 4850 single/CF benchmarks! NDA lifted?!
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1470/3/radeon_hd_4850_in_crossfire_at_4ghz/index.html
Pretty much what I suspected - the GTX280 starts to beat out the 4850CF, at very high resolutions (eg. 2560x1600). In other tests they come out almost equal.
The single HD4850 is good enough for 1680x1050 gaming, and at a good price.
http://www.techpowerup.com/63335/AMD_launches_Radeon_HD_48xx_Series_Today.html
Yes we have just made a decision to change something.
Heres what were planning to do. Effective 3:00 PM EDT today we will be lifting the embargo preventing the publishing of ATI Radeon HD 4850 performance previews. These performance previews may include ATI Radeon HD 4850 benchmarks, photos of the ATI Radeon HD 4850 hardware, information printed on related packaging or photos of the packaging itself, information provided in the ATI Radeon HD 4800 series strategy deck (attached) and related pricing information.
All other ATI Radeon HD 4850 related information provided at the NDA press briefings continues to fall under the embargo until 12:01am EDT on June 25th, as does all information and benchmarks related to the ATI Radeon HD 4870.
Basically whats happened is our partners have started selling the products and in some cases reviewers that we have and have not sampled have already bought and received the product and published stories. Were not able to control the situation anymore so we need to give the media the ability to publish info.
One of our readers has found an interesting post on the Forumdeluxx.de website which shows two ATI Radeon HD 4850 cards paired up with a Radeon HD 3870 DDR4 card in CrossFireX.
Even the user that wrote the post, didn't expect it to work, but it apparently it does and without any problem. The mentioned trio in CrossFireX scores 14,180 marks in 3DMark06. Before sticking in the HD 3870 card, the system scored 12,300 marks under Windows Vista 64-bit.
It is a nice boost when you consider that we are probably talking about the first tests of this kind, and we are sure that the red team will do some more optimizations before the HD 4850 hits the store shelves.
brain_stew said:Any GAFers after a 4850 for $190, go, go go:
http://fxvideocards.com/Sapphire-HD-Radeon-4850-p-16386.html
They seem pretty highly regarded on xtreme systems so it seems a safe bet.
lolPachael said:The Empire strikes back?! (unverified?)
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/9702/nvidia_surprise_with_9800_gtx_graphics_card/index.html
The 9800 GTX is now directly priced against the HD4850, fun times ahead![]()
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/...hd_4850_rv770/20/#abschnitt_performanceratingCheeto said:Ahh shit...do i get a 4850 or a 9800GTX? Decisions!!
well its 0 availability that took awhilebrain_stew said:Any GAFers after a 4850 for $190, go, go go:
http://fxvideocards.com/Sapphire-HD-Radeon-4850-p-16386.html
They seem pretty highly regarded on xtreme systems so it seems a safe bet.
Yes.WHOAguitarninja said:Is a 450 watt PSU enough for a 4850?
The 9800GTX is faster for the settings I use.irfan said:http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/...hd_4850_rv770/20/#abschnitt_performancerating
Pretty clear, 4850 is 71% faster than the 9800GTX under the highest of the settings. Nvidia cannot overcome that gap with overclocking, drivers .. just magic!:lol
irfan said:
Cheeto said:The 9800GTX is faster for the settings I use.
WHOAguitarninja said:Is a 450 watt PSU enough for a 4850?
Yeah I think I'll go with the 4850, but none of the manufacturers offer the awesome programs like EVGA does. Any chance that EVGA will offer ATi cards, or are they an NVidia exclusive partner?Outdoor Miner said:That'll change once a few driver revisions have hit for the 4850.
@ 16x12 8xAA/16xAF it nearly doubles the performance of a 9800GTX. That tells you clearly one is better for future-proofing.
It is, but look at 3870 outscoring the 8800 Ultra, yet there is big performance difference. I doubt how much of it will translate into gaming performance.camineet said:Geometry Shader performance in GTX280 is a major improvement over G80/G92.
Bare with me, I'm doing my best to get you guys a full review and not some half-baked quickie stuff. BTW forget all the numbers you have seen leaked, the new driver issued yesterday shows the real performance of this product.
Check in regular as again, I hope to be able to finish and publish this review today, if not tomorrow.