Why not accept that there may be more to explore? Matrix is the Wachowskis' baby, and Lana seems to believe that yes, there is more to the story.
From there, you don't have to complain - or whine or whatever you want to call your comments - about it
Wait, why do I need to accept it? Whether they want to make another sequel is irrelevant to whether I accept it or not.
My opinion has no bearing on what they choose to create. Be it far from me from obstructing others from creating what they desire.
I neither complain nor whined, so that was uncalled for. I was responding to someone else and you desire to interject and I happily engaged with you lol
Well maybe you should watch them again because while the end of Matrix 3 is not a cliffhanger, it's also not a conclusion. The newly created Matrix is a decoy that only serves to channel those rejecting the reality of The Matrix.
Humanity is not free = fight is not over = more stories to tell.
I'd certainly consider that a conclusion yes. Simply because it's not a desirable outcome doesn't negate it as a conclusion to a story that was told.
That conclusion was no kind of ending at all - not for the Matrix as a whole. I remember walking out thinking that they'd spent three entire movies getting to a denouement that changed virtually nothing. Now, I know that may have been the point they were trying to make (the one being a cyclical entity and all) but you'd think they could come up with something more satisfying and final. They copped out. No two ways about it.
That's a subjective claim though. My point is that it had a conclusion. I appreciate finality in a story, and I'm not referring to the Matrix universe as a whole.
I love the Animatrix, which served to explore plenty of ideas outside the story being told in the films.
I can understand where you're coming from, but personally, I don't like the idea of sequels serving as "do-overs."
