No, Rya ga Gotoku 3. There's a lot of good LE PS3s out there but in terms of the best, it's no contest!
I know a lot of people disagree, but fats looked great as they were, better than the Slim ever did.
Another model? Eh, now I don't know whether to get a PS3 now or wait.
Another model? Eh, now I don't know whether to get a PS3 now or wait.
Wait for the inevitable clearance sales on the current slim and buy then.
If the new box looks like this (bad IMO) and doesn't add signficant functional benefits, that's what I'll be doing.
When are they going to officially announce this? Is there gaming event coming up soon? I can only think of TGS off the top of my head.
Says who? Because they obviously don't know anything about semiconductor manufacturing.The super slim is supposed to be using 22nm CPU process & 28nm CPU process.
Thats pretty fucked up and shameless as all hell.The Register took MYE's mockup pics as fact, even worse, they credited Instagram!
PS3 always looked ugly imo, I don't know why people liked the fat design, the slim looks alright but this gen has been pretty boring in terms of console designs. Wii is the best one if only because of how small and elegant it looked (but all the jumbled wired sensor bullshit ruined that).
Fat design had that stupid curve (who likes curved objects for no reason? Flat is always better). The Spiderman font is terrible, it's difficult to use the USB slots because they're under a ridge thing so you have to lift the console up or look under it or feel the slot with your fingers, there isn't any symmetric quality to it the way there is with almost every other console. It's just a cumbersome stupid looking design.
Really, I'm sure it's a common opinion. I agree that they're hard to use due to their location as well.That's the only time I've ever heard that the USB slots are hard to use.
That's the only time I've ever heard that the USB slots are hard to use.
The one thing I did not understand with the PS3 is why they did not allow for custom covers. The fat PS3 had a nicely and easily removable top cover. They should have made it easier to interchange and sold game themed ones or at least allow third party ones.
It seems like 179,229,269 are the magic numbers
It seems like 179,229,269 are the magic numbers
PS3 slim uses 45nm CPU process & 40nm CPU process. The super slim is supposed to be using 22nm CPU process & 28nm CPU process. So the super slim will be more efficient and emit less heat than the current slim models.
I believe that in the long run super slim will prove to be more reliable than the slim.
It seems like 179,229,269 are the magic numbers
In what currency...It seems like 179,229,269 are the magic numbers
It looks good when vertical, and it looks expensive. While I think ps2slim was fine looking, the top loading drive screamed cheap, and I far prefer the iconoclastic, and now timeless look of OG PS2 (vertical, no stand).Why do people think the OG ps3 looks good? It's horribly shaped and large. The front profile is gag-inducingly ugly. PSOne and ps2slim are the only attractive sony consoles.
It seems like 179,229,269 are the magic numbers
Man it took me forever to associate that with price.
Interesting huh.
Really nice pricepoints if true. Sony should bundle All-Stars and LBPK into the 179 systems.
In what currency...
Also those are "awful" in terms of psychological pricing.
Sauce?
Sauce?
The Register took MYE's mockup pics as fact, even worse, they credited Instagram!
Another model? Eh, now I don't know whether to get a PS3 now or wait.
Elaborating on above, assuming veracity to the claim... $230 is too close to $250 for consumers to really give a crap and while $270 is a nice drop for the "high end" 500GB model (vs the $350 320GB).
So the question is will a $70 "price drop" with the HDD-less $180 16GB model drive significant sales over the current $160GB $250 model?
Elaborating on above, assuming veracity to the claim... $230 is too close to $250 for consumers to really give a crap and while $270 is a nice drop for the "high end" 500GB model (vs the $350 320GB).
So the question is will a $70 "price drop" with the HDD-less $180 16GB model drive significant sales over the current $160GB $250 model?
.......Magic numbers for what? im confusedSauce?
.......Magic numbers for what? im confused
EDIT: quoted wrong person oops but this is pertaining to elios' post
No doubt. Going below 199 will give them quite a boost.
The key point is opening to a new market, all those casuals users who don't care about a big hard drive to keep huge collections on it, they just want to able to play a few key games every year at the cheapest price possible. There are people who buy these consoles just to play COD and FIFA every year...just to get straight to the point.
In this sense it's a direct competitor to the Xbox360 4GB, something which Sony has lacked so far.
The models equipped with a hard drive get a capacity upgrade, a new smaller and power efficient form factor and a small price drop (20-30$, the 320GB model costs 299$ unbundled) while the new cheap model will drives most of the sales growth to a new audience, seems a pretty good and sound strategy to me.
It seems like 179,229,269 are the magic numbers
Huh ? What is that magic number: 179,229,269 ?
^_^
Prices.