In this case my goal would not to be to convince you, but to make an example of people like you with mediocre rebuttals so that people with critical thinking skills can really get to the bottom of what's going on. So I guess thanks for the contribution?
That’s good because you’re not convincing. You’re tired argument is the epitome of mediocre, it’s could almost be copy and paste. No ban or control will stop someone intent on doing harm, with firearms or something else. The Oklahoma City bombing is proof of that. Right to bear arms is one of the keystone items in the constitution. You really think a firearm ban or stricter checks would have stopped the New Zealand guy?