Of course small teams can create AAA games, but I guess it would take an entire generation. It's just too much work without enough human resources.
If specs don't matter why does anyone even bother upgrading to new consoles or buy mid gen refreshes? Just stick to current gen or a base console.
Most people don't right away. They wait until they feel upgrading will be "worth it", and usually as third parties start to cease cross-gen support. The enthusiasts are who goes first.
When people says that PS4 success was due the better specs I roll my eyes
That too.When people says that PS4 success was due the better specs I roll my eyes
The issue with specs was that PS4 was stronger and $100 cheaper... if XB1 was cheaper nobody may talk about the specs.
Another key factor were games... Sony come from a PS3 that delivered high praises AAA games while MS stopped to support 360 in 2012.
The mindshare about PS having the best game were already made up.
Coincidente or not PS4 ends like PS5 with fully support in high budget games that will push the move to PS5.
So the situation of PS5 is pretty comfortable right now with most the gamers moving from PS4 to PS5 due MS again lacking support in games.
Games wins generations.
Capped frequency.Really? Most Sony fans don't care if SeX is more powerful?
And why is that?
Because if you time warped to 2013 when system specs were hacked/leaked showing PS4 more powerful, which lead to 1080p games vs Xbox One 720p - 1080p games, it sure seemed like the average PS4 gamer cared a lot.
As for PS5's tf max, nobody even knows how much PS5 can sustain 10.3tf under tough conditions. And nobody even knows how long the gpu's 223 ghz can sustain that. Cerny answered with a vague "most of time" answer.
Even on Sony's own blog site, it says "up to" for both cpu and gpu. And if either of these are not maxed out, it's not going to be 10.3tf.
Unveiling New Details of PlayStation 5: Hardware Technical Specs [UPDATED]
Watch live for a deep dive into PS5's system architecture and how it will shape the future of games.blog.us.playstation.com
CPU: Variable frequency, up to 3.5 GHz
GPU: Variable frequency, up to 2.23 GHz (10.3 TFLOPS)
Well I believe if PS3 was launched in 2005 even at $500-600 that migration from PS2 to 360 could not happen in the scale it happened.
that will change this generation or the next. AI will take a big part in this. We already see AI helping with character animations. Creation of assets will benefit from AI too. What was done by 500 people could be done by 50 in the future.
Maybe. There were tons of rumours floating around at the time.
Just like Sony announced this. Yo-yo-ing cpu/gpu "up to" speeds. Something people are trying to get concrete info about, which is why sites are confused.
Unveiling New Details of PlayStation 5: Hardware Technical Specs [UPDATED]
Watch live for a deep dive into PS5's system architecture and how it will shape the future of games.
CPU: Variable frequency, up to 3.5 GHz
GPU: Variable frequency, up to 2.23 GHz (10.3 TFLOPS)
Wow you declare fan from a billionaire company not some IPs, artists or programers a company .... wtf is wrong and not
Sorry, but I didn't understand your point. You're talking about effort to create assets and animations during development, how is that related to storage space management?
Hey! You’re that guy who tried to pass off “insider” info. I remember you!
Not a rumor. A FACT. MS themselves mentioned the 24 hour authentication period at reveal ("who wants to live there", "get a 360", etc.).
Sure it was debunked. Any DRM stuff was communicated as cancelled during the summer of 2013. Xbox One launched in November.
It's a term coined by some fanboys in disdain of first party PS exclusives. An amusing strawman about lack of gameplay that they will hypocritically forget about when MS first party studios inevitably start emulating their style, gameplay and feel. In a way, they already started adopting the narrative style more, judging by Gears 5.
Canceled (it existed and was removed) or debunked (it never existed). Choose one.
www.pushsquare.com
Maybe. There were tons of rumours floating around at the time.
Just like Sony announced this. Yo-yo-ing cpu/gpu "up to" speeds. Something people are trying to get concrete info about, which is why sites are confused.
Unveiling New Details of PlayStation 5: Hardware Technical Specs [UPDATED]
Watch live for a deep dive into PS5's system architecture and how it will shape the future of games.
CPU: Variable frequency, up to 3.5 GHz
GPU: Variable frequency, up to 2.23 GHz (10.3 TFLOPS)
I have never seen so many people defend a company's stance to not disclose the full faqs since the DRM fiasco of 2013. Sony needs to be 100% transparent about this with charts of the numbers they can be held to including a list of loads that cause issues like avx256. You can't only post good numbers and sweep not so good ones under the rug that is shitty and needs to be called out like many of us did Microsoft in 2013.
Bruh, imagine defending Don Mattrick and his insane decisions and passing it off as "rumours" in 2020, lmao.
They're transparent.
Sure they can have it maxed out if they limit high power cpu work loads like avx256. That is all they told us about it. Is there GPU work loads that cause issues? Are there other problematic CPU workloads. If a game makes heavy use of the problem work loads how low can the clocks go. There is so many questions unanswered intentionally by Sony right now. Just marketing speak mostly, a couple ect nothing concrete. You can choose to keep your head in the sand and defend the right to hide the bad. I will call out both companies for that behavior.
That is not debunked but reversed lol
The base clock is 2230Mhz.
That is not true at all from the man as I said work loads can cause issues. He says it in marking speak to avoid hard numbers. Black and white no ifs ands or buts.
That is not true at all from the man as I said work loads can cause issues. He says it in marking speak to avoid hard numbers. Black and white no ifs ands or buts.
"Mark Cerny freely admits that CPU and GPU won't always be running at 3.5GHz and 2.23GHz respectively.
When that worst case game arrives, it will run at a lower clock speed. But not too much lower, to reduce power by 10 per cent it only takes a couple of percent reduction in frequency, so I'd expect any downclocking to be pretty minor," he explains
Hmmm... sounds an awful lot like Smart Delivery
.
That is not true at all from the man as I said work loads can cause issues. He says it in marking speak to avoid hard numbers. Black and white no ifs ands or buts.
"Mark Cerny freely admits that CPU and GPU won't always be running at 3.5GHz and 2.23GHz respectively.
When that worst case game arrives, it will run at a lower clock speed. But not too much lower, to reduce power by 10 per cent it only takes a couple of percent reduction in frequency, so I'd expect any downclocking to be pretty minor," he explains
That is not true at all from the man as I said work loads can cause issues. He says it in marking speak to avoid hard numbers. Black and white no ifs ands or buts.
"Mark Cerny freely admits that CPU and GPU won't always be running at 3.5GHz and 2.23GHz respectively.
When that worst case game arrives, it will run at a lower clock speed. But not too much lower, to reduce power by 10 per cent it only takes a couple of percent reduction in frequency, so I'd expect any downclocking to be pretty minor," he explains
There's no official word on this yet. I have been holding on to P.T. and would highly appreciate transfer of PS4 data to PS5 locally either by ethernet cable or usb storge.
Oh? I was under the impression you can freely re-download anything taken down by the PS Store.
sorry
